Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think we can be quite clear what 'ponces at the Victoria' meant...


It was meant as a dig at the owners of the Victoria, and


It was intended to insult/ slur and if you can't see that then you need your head testing


Sorry, no. I can't have that. I appreciate you feel under attack but I don't think that's fair.


I don't know anything about the people at the vic _ I've had one glass of coke in there since it opened. I wasn't taking notes about peoples sexuality as I did so.


The word was meant to mean "over-fancy" as i stated, and also not serious in any case. You alerted me to a derogatory meaning of the world so I withdrew it. I have not apologised for a slur, insult or similar because it was not one.

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------


> Actually, I often ask for less alcohol and more

> cherries.



Yeah, yeah.....


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/ba/Pinocchio-1940-poster.jpg

Way...


Got on at Shoreditch & got-off-at Wapping.


BUT then, I also saw a man climbing a ladder and sticking a "golden mushroom" a top a building by Hoxton Sq.


http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/9316/photo19hy.jpg


And...


http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/2730/photo18p.jpg One of The Chapman brothers ( yawn ) outside White Cube



It was a weirdly busy day


NETTE:-S

Frankito Wrote:

------------------------------------

> Anyone for foie gras and bubbles?


I'll pass thank you. Far too poncey for me. But I could murder a tub of glace cherries (and possibly some treacle).



(I have a sweet tooth)


Just to be clear, the use of "murder" here is not to be construed as in "killing with malice aforethought".


I bid you "Good Evening".

No. You MP, Sean and your little gang of mates prefer to back each other up rather than see what the intention of the word really was, because with you guys, it's not about an objective and fair appraisal but ganging up when the fancy takes you on whoever the next shooting target is. A right little clique of bullies amongst several on this forum.


If this is what anyone thinks, I lose all respect for them.


You! You dare speak to me about homophobia when I have spent weeks in a row, on this forum , defending almost alone with people like James, as people defend homophobia. ("oh but I wasn'nt a member then! who is James???" Exactly...tread more carefully)


When I have been physically attacked for being "gay"?? And you accuse me of being a defender of homophobia?



clique my arse.


self-elected, self important, jumped up would-be ombudsman, you are. Didn't you promise to f*** off weeks ago?


This claiming of clique is the easiest, pissiest, laziest tactic. I've never met half the people you speak of. But I have met you. You seemed all right. But in the last year you are like some rotweiller of language and semantics.


You dare speak of how people use "ponce"? And you compare it to "nigger"??


You should be ashamed of yourself.

My My


all this fuss over something that you can simply avoid, it's a bit like television, if you don't like the program turn over, in the case of FG if you don't like it or the methods used to farm it then eat somewhere else, don't stop people who do like it from enjoying it, my my the forum is becoming more and more of a nanny state every week.


Personally I like it, but I am not about to force my likes down the throats of those who don't B)

So the EDF is back.


It's been a slow week in the office and every time I turn to EDF for my reliable dose of light relief (once I've seen the latest daily mash instalment) all I have found is some fecking carry on about bollards.


I turn away for a day and come home to find an 8 page classic which whilst focussed on Foie Gras (of all things) acted as a medium for all the usual posturing.


TM you have truly captured the hearts and minds of East Dulwich and provided a wonderful distraction from the Hackgate tedium. I salute you even if I would prefer it that you leave the Prince Regent alone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...