Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting. I don't know anyone who does it and

> isn't a bit of a @#$%&.


You can substitute 'turns down a line' for 'does cocaine' if you must insist on being knuckleheadedly incapable of distinguishing between different sorts and levels of use.

Fuck pat?, there definitely seems to be a market for an ethically sourced, nasally administered, stimulant.


I?d buy it. If I had the time and energy to indulge in such things. Which I don?t.


I barely have time to have an espresso and act mildly superior towards a grubby teddy bear that sings Oh Susannah if you squeeze its belly.

Surely the point about foie gras is that there is no humane way to produce it. That's why it's production is banned here and elsewhere. So I think there is merit it arguing that it's consumption be banned too (because that is the mark of a civilised society). No person in their right mind would force feed a child in that way for the same outcome...so I really can not understand why anyone would condone the treatment of an animal in that way either.


Chicken, beef, eggs etc can be produced from animals reared in a humane way, and there is constant pressure to improve practises in those areas.


The other factor in all this of course is the price of food. The continued pressure to keep costs down is after all what really drives the poor farming of most animals - but not in the case of foie gras which fetches a premium price.


In America we are seeing the first 'super' industrialised dairy farms...where cows (never seeing a field) are kept on a conveyer belt form shed to milking. The mind boggles.

Force feeding a goose every day till it's liver practically bursts, is not excessively cruel? (or have I misunderstood?)


There's a big difference between an animal being driven to an abbatoir (a one off event) and an animal being cruelly treated every day of it's miserable life and for what? It's not like the world needs foie gras.


Just to say btw that I'm not belittling the experience of an animal en route to slaughter, or arguing it is as humane as it could be. Just that it's not comparable as justification for the production of foie gras.

Mick Mac made that point about the differences quite succinctly a few pages ago.


Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz. There is a big difference between how an

> animal is killed, which is necessary for food

> production, and an animal made to suffer every day

> in pursuit of a better taste.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac made that point about the differences

> quite succinctly a few pages ago.

>

....and yet people are still making the comparison between an animal suffering through slaughter vs. suffering it's entire life.


The death of an animal is never going to be pleasant and as a meat eater you have to accept that even if you can't justify it. Condemning an animal to a life of the brutality and suffering required for foie gras production isn't on IMO. OVER feeding is one thing, but FORCE feeding...don't think that can be carried out humanely.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whatever it does to a goose it can't be as

> painfull as trawling through 5 pages of this guff

> would have been.


Oh piffle Brendan. On 'serious' threads, the guff usually begins about 5 pages in whereas on 'silly' threads its often the opposite.


And binarystar, I couldn't agree more iwith what you've just said.

Hey Guys (or would you prefer: Hello, Hallo, Halo, Kalispera, Bonjour, Guten Tag, Heya, Whats up? Dear All)


South London Press will be kindly running this Foie Gras story tomorrow - be sure to buy a copy, it'll come with a wonderful picture of me outside Blue Brick Cafe.


I do have the support of over 120 people on my Dulwich Vegan and Veggie mailing list, although thats not the point, its within my right to call a manager of restaurants and chat to them about their stock. They decide their stock lists.


However, as Davids notes - most pro-meat / foie gras people won't go to the trouble of organising a local group, meetings, website, facebook, twitter, contact local paper and fellow organisations to campaign for foie gras or other meat products.


Im not against local businesses, Im against animal abuse where ever it crops up. (plant pun unintended!)


Thanks


Thomas

There's a big difference between an animal being driven to an abbatoir (a one off event) and an animal being cruelly treated every day of it's miserable life and for what? It's not like the world needs foie gras.


Agreed.


At the end of the day, if you want to eat meat, you have to accept that a nasty deed is required, be it a bullet to the head, a stun gun, a slit throat,a piano from the 5th story. The animal has to die.


It's the torturesque aspect of FG production which sets it aside IMO.

@TM "Im not against local businesses, Im against animal abuse where ever it crops up. (plant pun unintended!)"


Actually Thomas that's more of a pun than you seem to have realised. A goose's crop is part of its digestive system adjacent to the very gullet down which feed is forced in the process of producing foie gras.


Thanks for starting this thread.


Alec

Thomas Micklewright Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> South London Press will be kindly running this

> Foie Gras story tomorrow - be sure to buy a copy,

> it'll come with a wonderful picture of me outside

> Blue Brick Cafe.


I believe SLP have been known to frequent the EDF - hopefully they will depict both sides of the story.


Did the Blue Brick cafe ever serve fois gras? Next you'll be telling us you've convinced Dulwich Hardware and the local hairdressers to stop serving it.


> I do have the support of over 120 people on my Dulwich Vegan and Veggie mailing list, although

> thats not the point, its within my right to call a manager of restaurants and chat to them about

> their stock. They decide their stock lists.


You didn't answer my question, Thomas. Do you threaten to step up protest if a manager does not accede to your demands (well, at least in the places that really, actually serve it)? Maybe the SLP will investigate your methods and not just do a puff piece.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
    • Weve used EE for the past 6 years. We're next to Peckham Rye. It's consistent and we've never had any outages or technical issues. We watch live streams for football and suffer no lags or buffering.   All the best.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...