Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We should be eating horses then, you know the wasted ones from the racing industry that get shot regularly by the track side (with a little curtain around them)


I?m sure people would like that, I mean imagine the size of the liver alone.


Bet Fred could bring out a range and sell it in their bookies shop in a chiller cabinet.

Fred?s Fast Food, fast being the nature of the beast you?re eating.


It?ll catch on I?m sure of it.


However, ethical Food Gras is possible, but not sure that?s on the menu in this discussion.

It always makes me laugh how people get up in arms over foie gras, but will happily eat a chicken or pork product (not just raw meat but ready-cooked stuff, salami, sausages, sandwich fillers and so, so much more) without asking where it came from.


Spoiler alert - the conditions those animals are raised in are no better than the unethical foie producers. There IS ethical foie out there, it just costs an eye-watering sum of money. But that's true of all meat - the morally acceptable stuff is a lot more than the factory-farmed crap. The other problem with foie is it's astonishingly unhealthy. In a nation that's 80% overweight we probably shouldn't be eating something that's literally 90% fat.


If you've ever eaten at Morley's or any other standard high st chicken shop, if you like pepperoni on a pizza - even one of those nice-looking artisan ones on Lordship Lane, if you like greasy spoon cafe full English breakfasts, Yilmaz kebabs or a chicken curry ready meal...you are morally eating on the same level as someone chowing down on a foie gras terrine.


This is why plant=based food is increasingly popular and, frankly, good quality (check out Moving Mountains for example), and that's probably a good thing. Personally I love meat, but I've become really picky about what I eat and give to my family. WG Bunting (also known as Muscat) at the top of Peckham Park Road, in case you're wondering. Superb butchers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...