Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair, it's difficult to tell how pernickity

> they were if they were killed in the

> disarrangement of a plane crash, unless they

> managed to tidy their immediate environs in the

> aftermath of the disruption before succumbing to

> an irritably disordered end.



Yes but if you sniff them and there's an overwhelming whiff of Vecon you're on the right lines. Hold one up to the light and if there's a translucent element to them they are vegan and safe to eat.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you on acid Medic?


Haven't had that since I was about 14. What makes you ask? The licking or guzzling water test I presume.Never fails to work. Humans don't like it though as it highlights yet another unnatural thing they do which they shouldn't.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To know who is meant to eat meat there is a little

> test. Those who take water by licking it, eat

> meat. Apart from humans, who shouldn't be eating

> it anyway................


Vampire bats feed on blood by lapping at it - should they be told they are really veggies?


Also as mankind is a product of evolution can ANYTHING we do be said to be unnatural?


Finally - I had a cat that licked its own arse - even if I could do that I think I would still use a different method - but we both tried to keep it clean. Unnatural? When was the last time you saw a cow with a clean arse?

What's natural for a cow isn't necessarily natural for a cat or a human. When was the last time you dined on fresh grass or raw whole grain? Or your own half-digested regurgitated food? I like this thread; it's always fun to see how far the stirring of controversy will go and how many detours it will take. Regarding the original topic, I must agree with the person who said that the meat industry as currently practiced is so inhumane that the specific treatment of geese in this case does not stand out.
o0h by the way tomas mikleritw how are your lactose intorant pro vegan propganda dicussion groops going are yuo geting many peple coming along and dont yuo tink its a litler bit dish0nset to market yuor views by xploiting peples fears for the helth of thier kids and fmily i should call southwark tarding standrds as its vergin on teh disonest lol

richardbach Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> o0h by the way tomas mikleritw how are your lactose intorant pro vegan propganda dicussion

> groops going are yuo geting many peple coming along and dont yuo tink its a litler bit dish0nset

> to market yuor views by xploiting peples fears for the helth of thier kids and fmily i should call

> southwark tarding standrds as its vergin on teh disonest lol


Do you own an anti-spellchecker by any chance?

I gave it at least 1 day post-riots before engaging again!


Ha RichardB your are a lazy typer, go ahead and call trading standards, I dont trade anything! (except thoughts I suppose)


Is it dishonest to say cows milk is bad for human consumption?

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The published planning application proposal summary runs: "25/AP/1010  Installation of air source heat pumps; acoustic screening; pipework and trunking; replacement of radiators with air conditioning units; secondary glazing; replacement of non-original lantern roof; internal refurbishment including decoration, new fittings, toilets, kitchenettes, and remedial works to building fabric." https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=SU76HIKBJGS00 The officer's assessment includes mention of an external buggy store, which sounds a good idea if it's for use by visiting tots.  I remember one morning when I found the ground floor part-occupied by buggies, even in a few book bays.  🙂
    • Its good to hear concern for this amazing resource. If you ever visit you will find it full of Dulwich teenagers upstairs studying for exams, community is so vital for that generation. I am sure we dont want that to evaporate entirely. There is not much left. With all knowledge of the huge wealth that exists in the area, it would be so warm and rewarding for some of that to be passed to Dulwich library. The ground floor loos were returning to a state of nature itself. Moss was starting to grow.   X
    • The planned closure of Dulwich Library for over 6 months to refurb and change the heating seems odd. The description of works does not seems to align with the expected length of closure.  Some library authorities use shop fitters over December/January when they have no other work to undertake such library refurbs. The costs are especially keen as a result. And shop fitters are used to compressed time works. Win win.  I would hope the works involve using the vacant unused second floor. Perhaps relocating the first floor librarian back offices there to make a bigger user space on the first floor.
    • The consultation advertised as being last night Tuesday 18th, and to which our Councillor Renata Hamvas told me she was unable to attend, never happened because Events Team and Gala never showed up at Pod 1 Peckham Library. Cllr Hamvas is not supporting the 2nd weekend.  I then noticed in Southwark News the meeting is scheduled for tonight Wednesday 19th Nov 2025.  I can't attend. CllrVictoria Mills doesn't reply to my emails. Anyone able to go? I am unable to leave the house at this time. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...