Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There goes quids, comparing Mickelwright with Wilberforce. Not only is it inappropriate, it's megalomania.


Wilberforce was a rationalist, an MP and a parliamentary campaigner. He did not engage in unilateral guerilla targeting of those involved in the slave trade.


The other problem is that quids uses the views on this to 'prove' that ED's Guardian reading bourgeoisie is hypocritical.


Surely the more rational explanation is that actually the Guardian reading bourgeoisie he stereotypes simply doesn't exist?


It wasn't me who brought up 'moral justice', it was the campaigners (and repeated by you quids in your Wilberforce comment). I'm merely pointing out that their claim to moral righteousness is unfounded and simply incorrect. They are anything but moral. They're a minority special interest group engaged in totalitarian posturing.

????s, with your constant loathing of and moaning about ED's Guardian-reading middle class, you're in danger of becoming a one trick pony.


Perhaps a '????'s law' is needed; like Godwin's but for someone who brings up the lazy stereotype above in a thread.


Also, Foie Gras is most definitely NOT revolting. It's rich, flavoursome and something to be savoured, in its entire form or as a delicious pate, but never ever revolting.


I quite fancy some Pate de Fois Gras to go with my Picpoul de Penet this evening.


Is there anywhere left locally where one can purchase some?

As always Huge you're missing my point, probably deliberately and tieing it up with M's lone crusade, for which I care nothing about. I'm just laughing (andi t is only laughing) at the self-justification of eating a product that's so obviuolsy non-pc and actually revolting manufactured (the prcatice not the actual FG)


I love you all but you but the collective htypocracy by those that wear their 'progressive' politics as a badge of honour makes me chuckle a lot and is an easy and worthwhile target. It's a lovely example of liberal hypocarcy - shit taking a princilpled stand on this means I actually have to make a sacfifice to my priveliged lifestyle...oh, in that case I don't think I'll bother.



Riles people too, doesn't it. To have the shallowness of their principles so clearly exposed.

I just don't think the people you refer to exist?


You've identified "the collective hypocrisy by those that wear their 'progressive' politics as a badge of honour" and you're annoyed by it.


The challenge is that I can see anyone who wears "their 'progressive' politics as a badge of honour".


I don't think those people are here on the forum, or reading the guardian. I think you've invented it as a hate figure.


And if these people don't exist, then by definition there is no hypocrisy.


So it means that you get riled up by a figment of your imagination?


The easiest way to stop being riled up by it is to accept that they don't exist.

Quids, well yes. Except I wear my hypocrisy as a badge of honour - I think it's called the human condition.


As has been discussed elsewhere, we're all hypocrites to one degree or another, not just the Guardianistas, it's simply a matter of where we choose to draw the line.


I won't shop at Primark, largely because I don't hold with throwaway fashion and because their manufacturing practices have been shown time and time again to be unethical. But deep down, I suspect I wouldn't shop there anyway, because, well, I don't really like their clothes and I'm a bit of a fashion snob. I only buy organic or free range meat, but when drunk I've been known to devour a KFC and occasionally un Macdo, and I have no freaking clue what kind of lives the cows who make my many many pairs of shoes have lived.


I still read the Guardian with my head held high. And as for foie gras, I usually don't, but then, if I've had a couple of aperitifs and am feeling disinhibited, sometimes, occasionally, what the heck. Hell, I'd happily eat you if I thought you'd taste good enough with a chateau d'yquem.

It's the EDF Challenge Cup


"And they're off...


It's number 5 "Fois Gras" being chased here by "Finger Likkin Good" followed closely by "Who cares" & "I've go a Tenner on that one"...


They're all there still & coming up to the Final Furlong..


"High & Mighty" is moving up fast followed by "I'm on the fence here" though "Bollix" has pulled out closely followed by "Fairtrade" & " The Guardian " ....is still out there on the left



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/Deauville-Clairefontaine_obstacle_2.jpg/800px-Deauville-Clairefontaine_obstacle_2.jpg


It's anyones race ....."

Riled? Where's the riled bit Hugenot? I said it riles other people to have it pointed out...it makes me chuckle - serioulsy I'm not the first one to say do you actually read what people write on here? Or does youer keeness to argue (which I share) mean that you just scan read it and 'think' you know what posters have posted?


So all is rosy in Rosies' garden then....mmmm....would you happily stretch that Human Condition argument into more obviously contraversial SE22 issues, let's say Racism?

I don't eat foie gras myself, but do eat some nice rare pates. I tend to agree with Piersy that most people who are eating 'foie gras' are eating it only in the broadest sense.


It doesn't have to be force fed to be fattened liver. 'Gavage' or force-feeding is a particularly French habit, so odds are if that if it's not the product of France it's not force fed.


However, I've eaten horse, cat, dog, hamster and so on. I don't see any point in differentiating them.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rosie the line you talk about on principles is

> maybe too often is "when it affects my lifestyle'



Maybe it is "too often" but I for one would rather do something than nothing. I accept that I cannot know the source of the leather that makes a jacket or handbag - does that mean I should therefore say fuck it, I'm a hypocrite if I buy free range meat, so I'll stick to the factory farmed crap?


I have chosen lower returns from ethical investments, which I would argue considerably affects my lifestyle. I have chosen not to work for unethical people who would pay me a shit load more than I'm earning now, which quite definitely affects my lifestyle. My first concern will always be people over animals, which is why the pony sanctuary that recently DM-ed me wasted their cash. People I won't compromise on, animals I occasionally do. I'm happy with that, it fits my principles.


I'm sure other people have worked out their own. And I'm sure there are others who don't really give it that much thought. But I'm kind of with Jesus on his he who is without sin in the greenhouse bit.

I agree with quids to the extent that I was surprised that some of the people who I thought had pretty robust principles, are not concerned by the way FG is produced.


No-one is perfect and everyone has different levels of what they think is wrong, but I didn't expect myself to have higher principles on this than other people I consider generally far more aware and principled than me.


I find it difficult to understand why anyone who cares about other injustices etc would be happy to eat something that was produced as a result of prolonged torture to an animal.

Oh, I don't know - most people wouldn't eat chicken if they had to wring its neck and pluck it - doesn't really tell us anything.


Reminds me of a chum who was devastated in China to see cats in chicken cages being sold at a market for food. They were all packed in and miaouing.


So she rifled her purse, negotiated a price and bought eight to set free. Tragically it all happened so quickly that it took four before she realised that the vendor was snapping the neck of each one as she pulled them out...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...