Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well expect to be named in the paper as being successfully 'converted' by the veggies then, Brendan.


So, for the South London press, Tom's list of successful PEOPLE AND BUSINESSES WHO AGREE TO STOP SELLING FOIS GRAS


- EDT (It'll just be chips, gravy and peas now, though occasionally baby panda when in season)

- Blue Brick Cafe (that they convinced a veggie cafe to stop selling fois gras is just amazing.)

- 120 Veggies and Vegans (who have all replaced it with forced rhubarb)

- Dulwich Hardware

- A Hairdresser

- Brendan

The Prince Albert has agreed not to serve Foie Gras. I will be in the Telegraph next week congratulating them.


The Guardian Food Monthly is coming to do a double feature on the Drovers and the Pulse cafe - neither of which is serving Foie Gras. Then we are all going for a slap-up feed at Starburger.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Read the OP again Loz. Who said anything about a

> protest or demands? Thomas has every right to

> encourage people if he so chooses. Where has he

> issued a threat? You would think HE had done

> something wrong given the tone of your post.


I asked a question, Alan, as I am allowed to do if I so choose. Thomas has so far chosen not to answer, which is also his right. People can make of that what they will, which is, of course, their right.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz...I think the argument for the banning of the

> gras has been well made and without it being a

> vegeterian crusade. Give Thomas a break.


But it is a vegetarian crusade. As I said, there is a difference between convincing individual people not to eat fois gras versus running around leaning on people not to sell an entirely legal product.

But just to give it a go


Sometimes your humorlessness knows no bounds. Like a VIZ stereotype


Most people I know use ponce as defined by Urban Dictionary - ie



"An individual who attempts to fake having intelligence, class, or culture."


But forget that - someone who uses the language as precisely as TedMax, and you want to call him out on offensiveness?


I genuinely give up

Ted might apologise, but if you dare correlate the centuries old oppression of an entire race by a long standing word, with the very occasional use of the word "ponce" to describe gay people, you and I are having a proper falling out


Nigger is unambiguous. Ponce has many meanings and uses. And you should trust people a bit more and wag your finger a bit less. And that's coming from ME fer cryin out loud!

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But just to give it a go

>

> Sometimes your humorlessness knows no bounds. Like

> a VIZ stereotype

>

> Most people I know use ponce as defined by Urban

> Dictionary - ie

>

>

> "An individual who attempts to fake having

> intelligence, class, or culture."

>

> But forget that - someone who uses the language as

> precisely as TedMax, and you want to call him out

> on offensiveness?

>

> I genuinely give up


Anyone who is on this forum often enough can surely see what was meant? The trouble with people who are quick to take offence all the time means that when it is possibly justified, no-one can be bothered to listen anymore.


That thread where the lyrics to a Pogues song were complained about spring to mind.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone who is on this forum often enough can

> surely see what was meant? The trouble with

> people who are quick to take offence all the time

> means that when it is possibly justified, no-one

> can be bothered to listen anymore.

>



Never a truer word spoken.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
    • The situation outside Oru is far worse with their large tables immediately adjacent to badly parked bikes using the bike racks there. And the lamppost also blocking the pavement.
    • Urgently looking for a garage in SE London - Brockley, Crofton Park, Catford, Lewisham, Honor Oak, Dulwich, Forest Hill, Sydenham, Deptford, New Cross, Hither Green or Lee would all work. Willing to pay market rent. Must be available long term. Please call Andrew on 07740 339669 if you have one available.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...