Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know that you are able to defer a school place until the term after the child is 5, but does anyone know if you can put them back a year from the beginning, so they start a whole year later? I am assuming not. Also would be interested to hear if anyone has deferred a place and how it worked out.

You can defer for a full year but then the child would go straight into year 1 and you would have to take your chance on getting a place.


I think in practice deferring a term is about as much as would be sensible, and you would need to weigh up the pros and cons

So they would go back into their year to fit their age group? Can they go into the year below and you re-apply for a school place? I am guessing they would consider this to be sort of an unfair advantage? But presumably if you can defer until the term after your child's 5th birthday, then those born in August would start the following September? Am I making any sense at all?!!

You're right ct


A child who is 4 next month can start school in sept 2011 ... Or defer any time until the beginning of the term after they're 5 ... So sept 2012


But they would go straight into year 1 if they did that, and the place wouldn't be kept open that long

My son will start reception in september too. A large aspect of the first few months in my mind is the social relationships that develop. I believe schools are very reluctant to allow children to be away during these months because they end up missing out on these developments. Establishing good friendships could totally shape the attitude of the child towards school.


The reason I say this, is when my son was younger I had terrible difficulty settling him in 2 days at nursery. When he went to the school nursery I was really dreading it, but actually the daily continuity really helped and to my surprise he loved going to school. Of course every child is different and you have to always take that into account. Perhaps a good chat with the teachers (do they do home visits?) to figure out whats best for your daughter and keep an open mind either way.


Can't help agreeing that however wonderful and stimulating the home environment can be, it will never quite offer the same as a classroom. It is all part of the process of growing up and gaining independance, otherwise I almost feel you're holding them back.

ladywotlunches, I am in the same boat as you - DD2 is an early Oct baby & would have started nursery this coming January 2012 but now under the single intake she has to wait until September 2012 when she will be weeks off turning 4.


Doing the school run with her sister every day she is desperate to start already poor girl & many of her playmates who are just weeks older than her are starting this Sept.


I know there has to be a cut off somewhere but I wish there was a better way.

NL, she is entitled to her free 15h from Jan 2012 still.. so if a place comes up in the school nursery she could be admitted (schools tend to go by birthdate)


The knock on effect for school nurseries of the single point of entry to reception, is a problem for both parents of autumn born children, and for schools in some areas, who predict nursry vacancies

There can be a lot of advantages to deferring a school place. The adult-child ratio in preschools and nurseries are much better and so a child can receive much more attention than in a Reception class. The resources and activities provided tend also be more varied and less formal, the day can be much more interesting for the children and there tends to be more freedom. Of course, that does depend on what nursery and also what Reception class but I've spent a lot of time in many different Reception and nursery classes and the children always seem much happier in nursery than in Reception.

BB100 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There can be a lot of advantages to deferring a

> school place. The adult-child ratio in preschools

> and nurseries are much better and so a child can

> receive much more attention than in a Reception

> class. The resources and activities provided tend

> also be more varied and less formal, the day can

> be much more interesting for the children and

> there tends to be more freedom. Of course, that

> does depend on what nursery and also what

> Reception class but I've spent a lot of time in

> many different Reception and nursery classes and

> the children always seem much happier in nursery

> than in Reception.


Thanks for this. My gut instinct is to postpone school as long as possible. It's the freedom aspect that I am most concerned about really. To lose all that freedom at 4 is just too soon. The 'play' that they do in reception doesn't seem to be free play to me...it's pretty contrived.

katgod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

To be honest I

> am/was a sceptic about learning through play, but

> it works, they learn by osmosis somehow.


There is an enormous amount of research on learning through play, which I won't bore you with, but the theory is that children learn and operate at their highest level during play because it makes sense, is more interesting and the experences are richer and more complex.


The most enriching type of learning through play is with adult support and extension rather than just letting children play freely. This is what Reception is meant be, but there are very few teachers that actually understand early years.

Just to clarify on the rules on this, if your child is 4 before the 1st September, ie due to start school this September, their entry can be deferred to the term after their 5th birthday. You can't, however, defer to September 2012 if you child has a summer birthday as this means they lose their allocated place at primary and are starting with a different school year (You would have to reapply for primary schools). Probably the latest reasonable time to start would be the start of Easter term for spring-summer birthday children. You need to inform the school that your child will have a deferred entry so that their place is held. Remember also, if you defer, as well as missing learning to read/write with the rest of their class, they will be missing out on the early social interaction with the peers they will be spending their primary years with.

Renata

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to clarify on the rules on this, if your

> child is 4 before the 1st September, ie due to

> start school this September, their entry can be

> deferred to the term after their 5th birthday. You

> can't, however, defer to September 2012 if you

> child has a summer birthday as this means they

> lose their allocated place at primary and are

> starting with a different school year (You would

> have to reapply for primary schools). Probably the

> latest reasonable time to start would be the start

> of Easter term for spring-summer birthday

> children. You need to inform the school that your

> child will have a deferred entry so that their

> place is held. Remember also, if you defer, as

> well as missing learning to read/write with the

> rest of their class, they will be missing out on

> the early social interaction with the peers they

> will be spending their primary years with.

> Renata



Yes I understand this. What I did want to know was if I don't put my 4 year old in school this September and re-apply for a school place...which year will they put him in? Will he go into reception? Or will he go into the year that matches his age?

cuppa tea Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------




>

>

> Yes I know all this. What I did want to know was

> if I don't put my 4 year old in school this

> September and re-apply for a school place...which

> year will they put him in? Will he go into

> reception? Or will he go into the year that

> matches his age?


The latter

Cuppa Tea,

your son would go into year 1, ie would miss reception. Also be aware that primaries in this area tend to be full, so you would be relying on a child leaving after reception for your child to get a place (with a deferred entry, the place at your allocate primary wouldn't be kept open a full school year, so your child would lose their place).

Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...