Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would, genuinely, like to know whether the relatively flat north of the borough has been gritted, leaving the hilly south to suffer. Or whether there is equal (well, hill effects apart) pain for all Southwark's residents (and electors). If anyone has penetrated past the DKH road blocks into upper Southwark, how are things faring there?

Chadwick Road on the Camberwell Grove bridge closure diversion, long hill with iced over railway bridge at the top, appears to be un-gritted although should be on Southwark's gritting list.


If you have to stop anywhere on road due to cars passing, difficult to restart, coming down icy as hell.


Southwark have said they have gritted not seen a thing every since snow started.


Hope this helps

37 into Brixton this morning was fine - bit slow, but journey took no longer than usual.



It seems that Southwark have money in specific pots - eg money for lampposts; no money for grit - and don't seem able to understand that one is actually important and wanted.


Of course, there are so many other things......

They were gritting last night. I crossed paths with one outside JAGS on East Dulwich Grove at around 8pm. Dicey drive down Champion hill this morning. A car had slid into the central bollard at the bottom which caused a bit of chaos. Dog Kennel hill was backed up all the way to the top though.
Can it just be noted that snow like this - which will probably be gone by the weekend - occurs about once every five years or so these days? If Southwark kept fleets of gritters and staff to man them on standby throughout the winter, ready for a once-in-a-lustrum weather event, how would that sit with the "Southwark waste so much of our money" brigade?

It is reasonable to expect that certain roads are gritted - especially with the advance warning that we have had.


Southern - for instance - have been running empty trains all night so the tracks are fine this morning.


It's reasonable to expect the borough to get it's arse.in.gear, so to speak.


DKH this morning was dangerous - and it not a surprise that it would be heavily used.

It should be the case they can fetch vehicles in ahead of such a weather event, if you want to use that rather "in" phrase. Grit/salt boxes are there, all they need is a couple of workers to distribute it onto pavements. Keeping all roads clear is unrealistic but the main roads really ought to be kept clear. We don't need to keep them on standby throughout the year, just hire them in when necessary or tender the work out to specialists who have been primed to be ready with in X hours' notice.

Perhaps I should be a council officer and earn my bonus, or - better still - a consultant to earn the big bucks for my radical plan!

Of course it would be possible - anything's possible - to have enough resources to hand to deal with unusual weather; are we prepared to pay the extra council tax for that? Or should we just accept that very, very occasionally the weather will get the better of us and leave the cars (and bikes) at home?

We live in a northern hemisphere country, the south east of the country is next to a giant land mass which can get very cold during winter. It?s february. None of this is rocket science, snow happens in winter. The people of the north get more snow than we get, have less resources than we have, and a wider area to cover at regional level. They still manage to grit roads and people still manage to make it to work on time despite the weather. They don?t need chains on their tyres either! It?s just bizarre how London struggles with anything. It?s too hot, there are too many leaves, it?s snwoig, it?s too windy. Get a grip.


Louisa.

Cycling down Forest Hill Road through Peckham down to Peckham Library was treacherous this morning. Compacted snow and ice. Worst I've experienced for a decade in London. No sign of gritting. And then the roads north of the library to OKR and through to Blackfriars were alright. Probably down to intensity of use by buses and other vehicles than any gritting. Cycle lanes up Blackfriars Road over the bridge and up Farringdon were full of snow and ice.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They have grit they buy it in every winter- and

> there is a dept of transport emergency stock so

> there is NO excuse. Well... except for trotting

> out the lies about 'tory cuts' yet again


Are you claiming that it's a lie that the budget has been cut since 2010 by successive Tory governments? Because if so that's even worse rubbish than usual, in 2015 London councils as a whole received ?9.9bn in revenue resource grants, in 2019 that will have dropped to ?2.2bn.


Southwark may have adequate salt supplies (not grit, technically) but they only have three salting lorries. You want more, we, as taxpayers, will have to pay for more (they're about ?100,000 a pop) - oh no it's that horrid Labour council deliberately not buying any when they could but they want to make the government look bad. According to you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...