Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Either we will, as customers, support this, or we won't. LL is still an area which is mainly supported by relatively close residents - it doesn't have a large commuting population - and it isn't, yet, a destination venue. So, if we, who live here, want a Costa we will patronise it. If we don't, we won't and it will lose money. We already have a close Starbucks, in Dog Kennel Hill, and a Caf? Nero - as well as numerous non-chain caf? venues. If there is a market for yet another coffee shop, then fine. I doubt whether what (another) formula chain has to offer will provide sufficient differentiation, on price, quality or 'innovation' (product range) grounds to be compelling, but if it does, well the market will have spoken.

Again, an important point about big chains is that they will support loss-making sites on an individual basis in order to have a presence in an area, sometimes purely to deny the site to a competitor.


Their financial calculations move to a very different beat than those of independents and even small chains, so while we might (quite reasonably) question whether an area can support it, the company concerned may have a very different definition of success.

Caf? Nero Coffee is Caf? Nero Coffee.


Costa Coffee is Costa Coffee.


Starbucks Coffee is Starbucks Coffee.


They are what they are.


If you want something 'Different' you have to go elsewhere.


Only the independent cafes can offer something 'Different' You decide which is the best.


DulwichFox

In defense of Costa, they are the only coffee chain I?d step foot in. Cafe Nero and Starbucks make atrocious coffee, at least Costa train their staff and can be relied upon to make consistently better coffee than most independent shops. That being said their food is very sub par.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Either we will, as customers, support this, or we

> won't. LL is still an area which is mainly

> supported by relatively close residents - it

> doesn't have a large commuting population - and it

> isn't, yet, a destination venue. So, if we, who

> live here, want a Costa we will patronise it. If

> we don't, we won't and it will lose money. We

> already have a close Starbucks, in Dog Kennel

> Hill, and a Caf? Nero - as well as numerous

> non-chain caf? venues. If there is a market for

> yet another coffee shop, then fine. I doubt

> whether what (another) formula chain has to offer

> will provide sufficient differentiation, on price,

> quality or 'innovation' (product range) grounds to

> be compelling, but if it does, well the market

> will have spoken.


All coffee places are full in my expeience - but whether that translates to profit I don't know.


I actually like Nero's atrocious coffee - but maybe I should ask for an extra shot in Costa and Starbucks.

It is true Costa are the best of a bad bunch when it comes to chain coffee. But their offering is so inferior to the many brilliant coffee shops in East Dulwich. The Brick House, Kanella and Tart to name but 3 do really, really great coffee.


But if Nero's is anything to go by, people prefer familiarity to quality. It's always busy, despite serving the least inspiring, most insipid coffee in the whole of LL. So as much as i won't set foot in the new Costa, if they do open in the londis site, i suspect they will do well.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Costa started in Lambeth too. So a South

> London success story. That said, I still don't

> think we need them on Lordship Lane. Would be good

> to have a clothes shop.



Well said. There are plenty of coffee places but nowhere to do any clothes shopping.......

Annie5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think Costa started in Lambeth too. So a

> South

> > London success story. That said, I still don't

> > think we need them on Lordship Lane. Would be

> good

> > to have a clothes shop.

>

>

> Well said. There are plenty of coffee places but

> nowhere to do any clothes shopping.......


What about fashion conscious in Grove Vale or Sugar on the roundabout, White stuff, Iris, Ed in North Cross Road... and more. Plus charity shops of course.

Yeah we already have a handful of clothes shops. Not sure there's a market for any more. Especially with the size of the shops in ED, and the expensive rents.. it's only really going to be boutique-type places, and those sort of shops seem to have struggled (Question-air, Mrs Robinson, etc)


Most normal people buy clothes at affordable high street chain type places, and none of those are EVER going to come to ED.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Most normal people buy clothes at affordable high

> street chain type places, and none of those are

> EVER going to come to ED.



Well, let's hope.


People used to say the same about high street coffee shop type places - like Cafe Nero :(

East Dulwich will never attract large chain shops, simple as that. Also, I see no evidence of Costa trying to relocate to the Londis site, and I monitor the planning portal daily.


Any attempt to remove Londis will be met with strong opposition. Lots of elderly people rely on this shop.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> East Dulwich will never attract large chain shops,

> simple as that. Also, I see no evidence of Costa

> trying to relocate to the Londis site, and I

> monitor the planning portal daily.


Daily? Seriously? I genuinely wish I had that kind of spare time...


>

> Any attempt to remove Londis will be met with

> strong opposition. Lots of elderly people rely on

> this shop.

>

> Louisa.


As I understand it (and of course I could be wrong), it's Londis that are thinking of vacating because the site is no longer profitable enough for them? The opening of M+S has had an effect on their business, and though many people do use it, the overheads of running a 24 hour store must be considerable.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > East Dulwich will never attract large chain

> shops,

> > simple as that. Also, I see no evidence of

> Costa

> > trying to relocate to the Londis site, and I

> > monitor the planning portal daily.

>

> Daily? Seriously? I genuinely wish I had that kind

> of spare time...

>

> >

> > Any attempt to remove Londis will be met with

> > strong opposition. Lots of elderly people rely

> on

> > this shop.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> As I understand it (and of course I could be

> wrong), it's Londis that are thinking of vacating

> because the site is no longer profitable enough

> for them? The opening of M+S has had an effect on

> their business, and though many people do use it,

> the overheads of running a 24 hour store must be

> considerable.


From what I understand JoeLeg, the Londis store has not been profitable for some years, long before M&S arrived. Bare in mind the Iceland store had similar opening hours to M&S.


If Londis no longer wish to remain at this location, a viable alternative which keeps alive the useable community aspect must be found. Yet another restaurant is just not acceptable, nor is a coffee shop.


This site is handy for people who use gas and electric keys, and also I know a lot of elderly people who come here to buy lottery tickets and newspapers. I expect local councillors to fight tooth and nail to keep Londis or something similar at this site.


Louisa.

> From what I understand JoeLeg, the Londis store

> has not been profitable for some years, long

> before M&S arrived. Bare in mind the Iceland store

> had similar opening hours to M&S.


Yes, but M+S is pulling in more people than Iceland was, and I suspect they are picking up stuff while they are there that they might have used Londis for previously.



>

> If Londis no longer wish to remain at this

> location, a viable alternative which keeps alive

> the useable community aspect must be found. Yet

> another restaurant is just not acceptable, nor is

> a coffee shop.


While I heartily agree with you, I fear that the council will be unlikely to take that into consideration unless some kind of fervent representations are made. And remember this is Southwark we?re talking about...



>

> This site is handy for people who use gas and

> electric keys, and also I know a lot of elderly

> people who come here to buy lottery tickets and

> newspapers. I expect local councillors to fight

> tooth and nail to keep Londis or something similar

> at this site.


But if the site has dropped further into the red, what can local politicians do? The owners will eventually decide on its future, and unless a decrease in rent can somehow be agreed I don?t see what can be done, unfortunately.

  • 3 weeks later...

For transparency we have a local planning rule about 50% of the Lordship Lane shops units remaining as shop units. Londis is a shop unit. A coffee shop would not be a shop unit. On this basis a change of use should not receive planning permission.


The recent planning application for said change f use Cllr Rosie Shimell and I have requested a councillor call-in if officers are minded to grant planning permission. This means even if officers buckle and contravene our own planning rules it would be decided by a committee fo councillors - doesnt guarantee anything but it is the best protection of Rosie and I trying to protect our shopping high street.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would disagree that the tables outside the Blue Brick bothered nobody. They were not within the cafe's curtilage (one table was even placed on the other side of the road!) but on a narrow public footpath where pedestrians have a "public right of way". Added to that, some customers rearranged the tables so the footpath was blocked completely. 
    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...