Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, we're looking to buy a second hand estate car having ruled out 4x4's and mpv's (for boot space and cost reasons)


Does anyone have any recommendations (we'll have 2 car seats in at all times), and cars to avoid.


Price range for a 3 or 4 year old car is about 8k. Looking for reliability so maybe the Passat estate (anyone had experience of the auto handbrake), or a Honda Accord / Toyota Avensis estate.


Any tips welcome. thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18330-estate-cars-advice/
Share on other sites

Tommy we have an old Volvo & it has been fantastic.


2 car seats in the back at all times & a very handy extra is that the arm rest folds down, then has a bit that flips up to turn it into a booster seat in the middle of the back seat (with 3 point harness as standard). This is a godsend when we have friends to play. Don't know if it's standard in the newer volvos but look out for it.


Car giant seem good for second hand estates from all I've heard - no personal experience.

Tommy,


we have had the Passat Estate for 4 years now and are delighted. It is very reliable, lovely and easy to drive. We had the Volvo V70 before and again, fab car. Slightly bigger and we felt we were (kind of) able to downsize a bit. It had seats in the back which was useful but our children are too big to make use of those now (9 and 13). Also, we had serious issues with Volvo and would not buy another car from them.

We've just sold our Jaguar X type estate, which was fab. Loads of space, extremely reliable. Ours was a 2006 model, we traded it so price we got isn't much help, but I think you'd pick up one just a little bit older for around ?8k.


We decided we no longer needed an estate car, and have traded for a large saloon which, if anything, gives us more room than we had before!

we have had 2 mercededes estates with extra seats in the boots. they have both been really good E300 D. They are quite old but have been safe family cars and had each for a least 10 years. I know the newer mercedes models have not reviewed so well but the older ones are really good ove 200,000 miles on the clock on the last one, 165,000 the current one.
love our passat estate, loads of room, 3 seat belts in the back for car seats and heaps of space for camping trips etc., we have got a diesel and it's pretty economical to drive, very reliable too - no probs in the last 3 years we've had it...(she says touching wood)
We've got an ooooollllld Audi a4 estate (Audi a4 1.9 tdi) and it's brilliant. You could get a lot for your 8k if you got a second hand one. Excellent fuel economy, managed to get 60mpg on motorways. We have our 18mo olds seat in the back as well as a newborn seat (still waiting for newborn though). Maclaren and Phil and teds in the boot- so v spacious. Couldn't recommend enough!!!
We have just ventured into the world of estate cars - our brief - maximum space and power for minimum cost. We ended up with a skoda(!) octavia vrs. I love it - so much easier to drive than our megane, and parking sensors mean I can reverse park - hurrah! It has a huge boot, but despite that my husband still went out and bought a roof box for a recent trip away - 2 car seats, 2 travel cots, high chair, bike, scooter, double buggy, luggage and food for a week...phew...

Thank you for all the recommendations. We went to Car Giant first thing on Saturday, it was a good experience all round.


Just comparing boot sizes and car dimensions on the auto express website to narrow it down.


One more question - are parking sensors really useful or just a gimmick ?


Cheers


T

Mellors Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely the "London Kiss" is what most people use

> for a parking sensor?


:), indeed I have parking sensors for the first time on my car now and although I do find them handy, for very tight spaces they are quite a pain, as even when its giving me the full on beeeeeeeeeepp to say stop NOW, theres a good few inches, or even more, to spare. But perhaps thats just Volvo being overly cautious, as ever!

Yep- we worked it out, as we don't have a trip computer, but my husband is a bit obsessive about working things out like that, even has a spreadsheet (lord help me...). We've done over 16,000 miles in the two years we've had it (lots of long trips, the one in question was from SE5 to Edinburgh and back) and it's consistently been great. However, husband is a bit of a tyrant when it comes to fuel economy- no AC on or windows open. Scrooge.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...