Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If that many birds are killed then it is because they were the weakest in their group and - like the wildebeest brought down by the lion - their loss strengthens the gene pool.


We all adore a chirpy tit

Long tailed blue or great;

But surely any stupid tit

Should be consigned to fate.


[Expurgated chapter from: Birds of Britain, J.L. Bonhote, 1907.]

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If that many birds are killed then it is because

> they were the weakest in their group and - like

> the wildebeest brought down by the lion - their

> loss strengthens the gene pool.

>

Wildebeest and crocodile are indigenous to where they prey or are preyed upon, and both have adopted different survival strategies over along period of time (the strategy of wildebeest being security and survival through sheer numbers).

the problem with cats is that their numbers have increased dramatically because people have acquired them in large quantities and let them roam and destroy a varied habitat.


As for mice and rats other pest control measures exist.

"the problem with cats is that their numbers have increased dramatically because people have acquired them in large quantities and let them roam and destroy a varied habitat."


What habitat is that exactly? The man-made habitat of suburbia? If you look at the decline in UK birds numbers it is mainly down to changes in farming practices, loss of suitable nesting sites and climate - and that most of the birds affected are from rural and woodland areas. Cats do not enter the picture in any significant way at all and the point I was making was a general one about predator and prey. The RSPB puts it better:


"Despite the large numbers of birds killed, there is no scientific evidence that predation by cats in gardens is having any impact on bird populations UK-wide. This may be surprising, but many millions of birds die naturally every year, mainly through starvation, disease, or other forms of predation. There is evidence that cats tend to take weak or sickly birds."

200,000 birds a day killed by cats in UK.

1,400,000 birds a week.

42 million birds a month.

504 million (half a billion) birds a year.


Strange, I live in a neighbourhood frequented by cats and don't see even a tiny portion of the dead-bird mountain that's allegedly being created by cats.


Rubbish original statistic IMO. No empirical evidence, just a figure conjured up in the research labs of Analville, TN.

Anyway, think of the relief the worms are getting with 200,000 dead birds a day in UK. No-one thinks of the worms do they, just because they're not feathered and can't sing sweet songs. Biased OP, it's anti-cats, ignores plight of worms.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 200,000 birds a day killed by cats in UK.

> 1,400,000 birds a week.

> 42 million birds a month.

> 504 million (half a billion) birds a year.

>

200 000 x 365 = 73 000 000 good with words, not so with figures.

get back to your bank

Well, let's have a think.


Our cat does half a dozen birds or so a year.. (that we know of, though she's usually most keen to share)


Assuming 7 million cats in the uk, assuming some will be stone killers and some namby-pamby wuss-cats; assuming they hit their bird-killing, beak-twisting stride when they're still youngish and then lose their touch..


I'm gonna have a stab and say more like 50,000 birds. 50k Dead birds.

I've lived with cats for every day of my many years on this planet....not one has ever brought home a bird....lot's of mice and rats yes...but never a bird. And KK is right to ask how was this figure of 200,000 was arrived at.


Sounds like you have a 'real' moggie there *bob* :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...