Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If that many birds are killed then it is because they were the weakest in their group and - like the wildebeest brought down by the lion - their loss strengthens the gene pool.


We all adore a chirpy tit

Long tailed blue or great;

But surely any stupid tit

Should be consigned to fate.


[Expurgated chapter from: Birds of Britain, J.L. Bonhote, 1907.]

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If that many birds are killed then it is because

> they were the weakest in their group and - like

> the wildebeest brought down by the lion - their

> loss strengthens the gene pool.

>

Wildebeest and crocodile are indigenous to where they prey or are preyed upon, and both have adopted different survival strategies over along period of time (the strategy of wildebeest being security and survival through sheer numbers).

the problem with cats is that their numbers have increased dramatically because people have acquired them in large quantities and let them roam and destroy a varied habitat.


As for mice and rats other pest control measures exist.

"the problem with cats is that their numbers have increased dramatically because people have acquired them in large quantities and let them roam and destroy a varied habitat."


What habitat is that exactly? The man-made habitat of suburbia? If you look at the decline in UK birds numbers it is mainly down to changes in farming practices, loss of suitable nesting sites and climate - and that most of the birds affected are from rural and woodland areas. Cats do not enter the picture in any significant way at all and the point I was making was a general one about predator and prey. The RSPB puts it better:


"Despite the large numbers of birds killed, there is no scientific evidence that predation by cats in gardens is having any impact on bird populations UK-wide. This may be surprising, but many millions of birds die naturally every year, mainly through starvation, disease, or other forms of predation. There is evidence that cats tend to take weak or sickly birds."

200,000 birds a day killed by cats in UK.

1,400,000 birds a week.

42 million birds a month.

504 million (half a billion) birds a year.


Strange, I live in a neighbourhood frequented by cats and don't see even a tiny portion of the dead-bird mountain that's allegedly being created by cats.


Rubbish original statistic IMO. No empirical evidence, just a figure conjured up in the research labs of Analville, TN.

Anyway, think of the relief the worms are getting with 200,000 dead birds a day in UK. No-one thinks of the worms do they, just because they're not feathered and can't sing sweet songs. Biased OP, it's anti-cats, ignores plight of worms.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 200,000 birds a day killed by cats in UK.

> 1,400,000 birds a week.

> 42 million birds a month.

> 504 million (half a billion) birds a year.

>

200 000 x 365 = 73 000 000 good with words, not so with figures.

get back to your bank

Well, let's have a think.


Our cat does half a dozen birds or so a year.. (that we know of, though she's usually most keen to share)


Assuming 7 million cats in the uk, assuming some will be stone killers and some namby-pamby wuss-cats; assuming they hit their bird-killing, beak-twisting stride when they're still youngish and then lose their touch..


I'm gonna have a stab and say more like 50,000 birds. 50k Dead birds.

I've lived with cats for every day of my many years on this planet....not one has ever brought home a bird....lot's of mice and rats yes...but never a bird. And KK is right to ask how was this figure of 200,000 was arrived at.


Sounds like you have a 'real' moggie there *bob* :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What happened to Clapham? You are going to get subsidence in most places.. if you have the money and thinking about resale or letting plus schools, amenities then certain parts of Herne Hill would be fine.. Plenty of people on forum would love to have clearly the budget you have to buy a property.. Your problem is, tbh.. you want a bargain and that is not going to happen in the areas you are looking in.. Most properties, with respect are sold before coming on the market or via word of mouth.. My advice, work with an agent not several as they compare notes, accept the fact that if you go via an agent, owner will be paying a fee to the agent.. Guess you are what is called “time waster”…     Actually, why don’t you buy in the country.. 
    • @Sephiroth I agree and since most affordable courier companies now expect you to stay in for at least half a day for a delivery and even then have weasel-worded T&Cs that outline that half day 'window' as an aim not a guarantee, making it is moveable delivery 'feast', it is no wonder parcels go missing. 
    • People don’t go out of their way to leave  their valuables out on the porch  they are most likely at work when a delivery company decides on their behalf to just leave it on the doorstep.  They are the problem not “people being surprised when their items disappear” 
    • Yes, Direct Line automatically rejected it when I tried to get a quote. Insurers really are a nightmare, and they have a huge psychological impact on buyers. When you’re about to put £1m into a pile of bricks, and the insurance companies either refuse to insure it or quote an outrageous premium, of course it’s going to scare anyone. I’m not actually worried about subsidence in this house main building , but the bay window has definitely been affected by that tree, and the council won’t remove it. When the movement continues, rebuilding the bay window would cost at least £40k. The seller will never admit this, but there are already houses on that street where the bay windows have had to be rebuilt. If not East Dulwich, I’m now looking towards the west. There are a lot of subsidence issues with properties in Forest Hill, and Bromley and West Wickham aren’t really for me. I’m not interested in any part of Dulwich except ED, ND and Dulwich Village — and obviously ED offers the best value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...