Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes it is free. A public consultation that will include the part of Melbourne Grove between Grove Vale and East Dulwich Grove will take place late Autumn about whether residents want Controlled Parking.


A parking stress survey has taken place and I'm trying to obtain the results.

It seems like we have this sort of consultation every year and every year the residents say no. This leads me to conclude that it is the council that desperately want controlled parking....why, I wonder?


A major source of parking congestion round Melbourne way is the car wash at the end of Chesterfield, where parking attendants seem to turn a blind eye to the cars backed up waiting to get washed, parked on yellow lines and clogging the street.


A further source of parking congestion is the builders vans and skips, courtesy of myriad loft conversions in the area. Sort these issues and parking would improve immeasurably.


I mean the above only partly tongue in cheek.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

>

> A further source of parking congestion is the

> builders vans and skips, courtesy of myriad loft

> conversions in the area. Sort these issues and

> parking would improve immeasurably.

>

> I mean the above only partly tongue in cheek.



Argh the skips drive me insane, we have 3 down our (short) road currently, none of them with covers on so the rubbish gets blown all across the street. lovely!

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes it is free. A public consultation that will

> include the part of Melbourne Grove between Grove

> Vale and East Dulwich Grove will take place late

> Autumn about whether residents want Controlled

> Parking.

>

> A parking stress survey has taken place and I'm

> trying to obtain the results.


Hi James, any chance that we might be able to get the public consultation to include discussions about parking on East Dulwich Grove? Parking for residents is a nightmare along here due to people using it for the hospital...


Thanks

Hi first mate,

What an appalling memory you have. The council last formally consulted about this some time before 2006.

Last year many residents raised this on the doorstep so local Councillors ran a questionaire about this and small majority from meory wanted controlled parking.


Really don't see the car wash at the Lordship Lane end of Chesterfield causing Parkin stress on Melbourne Grove?

The parking stress survey that was gently undertaken will make it clear if commuter parking is the issue or not.

James,


You may have a point about my memory, however, it does not take a genius to work out that those residents and others unable to park in Chesterfield because parking is already gobbled up by the numerous car wash clients and abundant skips and builders vehicles, will go to the next street- Melbourne Grove.

We used to live on the corner of Ashbourne Grove and Melbourne Grove - unfortunately I have to say car parking was a bit of a nightmare. Obviously at weekends lots of shoppers park along Ashbourne Grove but we tended to find that weekdays were worse with commuters parking for the station. It wasn't helped by more and more people turning their front gardens into driveways along Ashbourne Grove so spaces along the road became quite limited (not that I blamed them). I regularly had to park a long way down Melbourne Grove which was a pain with a bootful of Sainsbury's shopping!


But we found the advantages of being so near the station as well as the main drag of LL far outweighed the annoying parking so don't let it put you off too much! Good luck with your move!

I'd agree the problem is mainly commuters (so incredibly annoying!) and people parking for the hospital - it's not really the LL shops as wekend parking is never, ever a problem.


But it is a real problem in the week. I've regularly had to park over 10 minutes' walk from my house, and with shopping that really is a pain.

Perhaps commuters are a problem but I would plead with you not to go the way of controlled parking. We've always managed without it, and once tied up into paying those fees there is no way back. Aside from the car wash and builder vehicles another bugbear of mine is two car families.

Agreed with first mate re. parking. I live exactly where Poppy used to live, i.e. corner of Ashbourne and Melbourne, and have really not had a parking problem in 7 years. Yes, like Poppy, I sometimes have to park a bit further up the road (occasionally with shopping!), but personally I don't see that as an issue. Living close to the station has other benefits, and frankly one would expect some extra cars by virtue of doing so - like much in life, it's a trade-off.


But controlled parking zones are a nightmare! Avoid at all costs. Free parking is one of Dulwich's many attractions as a "liveable" area, making it an oasis of civilisation in the over-regulated, bureaucratic, stressful quagmire a lot of London's streets have become. Basically, yay for ED!

Bels123 has got it spot on. I live on Derwent Grove and all our neighbours want controlled parking. With so many houses being converted in flats the number of cars just keeps rising. You are more likely to find a unicorn walking down LL than a parking space during the day.


It would also be better for the shops on Grove Vale - with customers actually being able to park somewhere. I don't see a downside (except for a few commuters)

There is no controlled parking zone on Melbourne Grove (thank goodness) but parking there is not entirely without cost as I discovered last week when I got home and saw someone had scraped along the side of my car and dented the wheel arch.


Fairly predictable I suppose given that the last bit of Melbourne Grove corner with East Dulwich Grove (used as a cut through to Grove Vale) is incredibly congested almost all of the time.


If only the Council had implemented a one way scheme rather than mucking about with random pavement widening on Grove Vale...

Agreed, jimmyjay. A 1 hour restriction soon also causes endless hassles to casual visitors (aged parents etc.) as well as the usual "has the bay been suspended while I'm away / have I gone out to check that I haven't been clamped/towed even though I'm a resident" problems. Wrong ticketing/car removal happened endlessly where I last lived under a parking zone, even if on appeal they had to refund (after months of argument). Anyone who seriously wants one of these clearly hasn't lived under one before. It doesn't help with parking spaces for residents either, as they always restrict (by bay markings) the actual amount of road available to park on when they bring one in.

JimmyJay,


I agree too. That is why the council keep pushing for it- it's a lovely revenue source and who knows how far they'll hike the prices once they get the controlled parking in. I would fight this every inch of the way and, interestingly, I know of no resident that supports it.

Councils do not introduce controlled parking to benefit residents, in the main, but as a valuable revenue source (fees and fines). Curb space is an asset they can sell/ rent. As soon as controlled parking is introduced into a neighbourhood, even if initially in a limited fashion, it races out, as visiting cars are pushed further and further away from the initial site of controlled parking, therebye creating a further argument for its extension. Introduce it now on Melbourne Grove and all the roads leading off Lordship Lane - probably through to the police station, will be controlled parking within 5 years.


Even where, initially, resident parking is 'free' it is often rationed and soon is charged for - 'just an administrative cost you understand' .... And visitor parking permits will certainly come at a cost. Cars will be fined for overlapping bays or encroaching white lines - it will be a parking control company bonanza as wardens are targeted on revenue generation.


Within a lustrum the quality of life across ED will be diminished as car owning residents find themselves in a constant car war of attrition with 'the management'. And the value of my house will soar as I have off street parking for several cars!

bels123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a Melbourne Grove resident I find it hard to

> understand why people are so against controlled

> parking.

> I'm not an expert on controlled parking, but I

> don't see why true residents should have to pay

> for, surely the enthusiastic parking wardens would

> generate enough income to cover administration

> costs?


I'll eat my hat (and any other accessories you care to suggest) if Southwark introduced controlled parking without a charge to the residents.

As a resident of Melbourne Grove i'd warn anyone thinking of moving to the street that parking is a total and utter nightmare. Don't buy a house unless you are willing to spend 20 minutes everyday driving round to try and find a space... oh and be happy that your car wing mirrors will be smashed off by drivers trying to squeese their way up the road.

Bring on the controlled parking and i for one will have no issue in paying for a permit if it results in me being able to park within eye sight of my own house.

No to permits! It will spread and I have lived in a permitted area before and visitor permits were a nightmare. I don't understand people saying they sometimes have to walk for 10 mins there's always a space on blackwater street which is definitely less than 10 mins and I'm sure other roads have space too. Why do you need to be in sight of your car?
Oh come on, garnwba, that's just nonsense. Even at its worst (and I don't much care for it at its worst), I've NEVER had to look for 20 minutes to find a space. Nor had to park more than about 200 yards away. Even during the day, on a weekday, which is the busiest time. And usually we can get to within a few cars of home. It's not great, and can be frustrating, but it's really not as bad as all that. But I'd be happy with residents' parking. Keep the vehicle dumpers away, and the occasional people who park for two weeks while they go on holiday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...