Jump to content

Recommended Posts

puzzled Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> of course, when your party was in control the sun

> shone every day and peckham rye became the elysian

> fields. funny how your brilliance resulted in a

> swing to labour that bucked the national trend big

> time and swept you from and your tory mates from

> power..... and returned tessa and hattie with big

> majorities too.


I know James can get a little party political at times, but in general he is a very big force for good around here.


That sort of tiresome political posturing, however, is just a cheap shot and not much use to anyone. And, AFAIK, you don't have the mitigation of actually being useful to the general community, puzzled.

James - funny how you like to give it, but change subject and clearly can't take it.


As a Southwark Cllr I cannot see how you can blame the other administration. On things such as this which are NOT political you should all be pulling together working for the good of the community, as it is us who suffer.

Speaking as a Labour supporter generally I have to agree with Loz here... James always seems like he has a genuine desire to help people and his availability here is really refreshing. I don't get to spend a lot of time on the forum so I probably haven't seen a lot of James's posts but I don't get the impression that he comes here to push his political agenda especially.

Quite rightly if I go of the thread topic or am overtly political the administrator reprimands me.

If you ever feel I have done this please do report me.


If the administration does something wrong I will say so. Equally when they do something right such as the food waste pilot I say so.


When the lib deems led Southwark council I said sorry several times when things went wrong. Equally I was proud when things went well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm confused. If there are no lifts, does that mean people who are in wheelchairs or who otherwise can't easily  walk, or who have heavy wheeled cases which they can't lift up and down stairs,  can't use Peckham Rye station? I'd have thought that was against some or other disability legislation?
    • Whose priorities? Peckham Rye station is operated by Southern Railway. Southwark Council doesn’t own or operate the station, and it can't force Southern or anyone else to install lifts at the station. I'd love there to be lifts at Peckham Rye. It would be very expensive.
    • Anything that improves the front of the station has to be a good thing. Opening up the square in front is a superb idea, it will show the beauty of the architecture of the station, just as they did at Kings Cross when they ripped out the monstrosity of the 1960's frontage and now the station gleams. People probably go there to see the beauty of it. Now wouldn't it be good if once opened up and cleaned up, people visited to see how wonderful it then looks. I guess there is a generally lack of trust that the station square will open by the end of next year, HOWEVER, when the current frontage is removed and the square is opened up as it originally was it will look grand.  
    • i) You must think Liebour can do no wrong, can lie through their teeth and yet you appear to believe every word Starmer and his stooges utter. ii) More assumptions made by you, well guess what you're utterly W R O N G, seems like that's your first trip, just as I predicted.  iii) and you won't be blaming me old man. Shockingly, I actually have to agree with some of the points you've raised.  Reform are the relics of BNP and UKIP, both detestable so add them together and you get an even worse result which is Reform that the UK can do without. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...