Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Agreed Sophiechristophy - the only thing it is doing for a short while is extending his wake up time from 5am to 6.30 or 7am. Frankly, right now, that's a Godsend as the 5ams were starting to wear me down. He's had pear, apple and tomorrow he'll be having some of the butternut squash that's just finished roasting in the oven. Thanks for everyone's information - as a Formula novice, it's been good to see two opinions.

Saila I think you are totally worrying About the wrong thIng


Not using hot water as suggested because you think the danger if destroying protein is greater than from formula contamination, despite all the evidence, is rather bizarre to me! Still, good luck to you


I do suggest peoPle check it out properly though, before deciding not to fill the recommendatiOn

Fuschia - I think we have our wires crossed here. The most important thing is that ppl use water that has been boiled. to sterilise the water.


The point I don't bother with is adding the powder at 70 degrees (half an hour after it has boiled) to remove the rare bacteria that is found in the powder.


I just boil to sterilse the water (only for small babies, not toddlers) and then use cooled boiled water for the feed. That way you don't grow up a load of new bacteria by leaving warm milk around and it doesn't take 40 mins to make a feed.


Adding boilding water to milk powder is defo a no no. which is why the advice, instructions on the back of every can, say to wait for th boiing water to cool before adding.


Why would they say wait otherwise?


Why on earth would I worry about a bacteria that has never caused an infection in this country?

so that's less than 1/60million chance... i more likely going to win the lottery 4x over... not just a small risk but a ridiculously small risk

Not sure I'm worrying about the wrong thing here...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But they were going to cut down a tree that had no notice on it ? Either way thank goodness people intervened. My total lack of confidence in Southwark tree dept is justified it would seem… 
    • Hopefully the confusion won’t lead to injury. 
    • To clarify a few points- I didn't just happen to be passing, I saw the workmen setting up equipment worryingly close to the tree from my front window, so put my shoes on and headed over there as quickly as possible just in case. Unfortunately they had already lopped a few branches off in the two minutes it took me to get there. Although I didn't see them attach a notice, the wording on the notice pictured above has the same terminology that they used with me - fungal brackets - so presumably it was them. I have no idea who removed the sign, or why. Also worth mentioning that they were third party contractors, carrying out work orders from the council. I'm a bit confused by the 'mistaken tree' comments, as Councillor Renata Hamvas posted on a Facebook thread that she had raised the issue with the relevant council officers, and that the response she received is that the tree does have a fungal infection. So there seems to be conflicting info there, and I'm concerned that the tree is still in danger.
    • To be fair, do we know who put the notice on the wrong tree? The people wielding chainsaws almost certainly won't be the experts  who identify  the problems with the trees? They just go along and hack down what they're told to hack down? I might be wrong, but whilst actual tree surgery needs expertise, I wouldn't have thought hacking down a whole tree did? Apart from knowing how to use a chainsaw, obviously.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...