Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi. So, further to my recent post, I've bought some formula and the boy had it in his baby rice and fruit puree this morning and it all went well. I made up a beaker full as that was easiest this morning but we didn't use it all in his breakfast. It's been in the fridge, in the beaker, ever since.


Can I use it in his tea tonight? I would presume I can't keep it any longer, but the instructions imply use it immediately, or else! But I know that people make up bottles and take them on days out? Or did I dream that?


He's still being bf so this is just for his baby rice. Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18044-weaning-question/
Share on other sites

My expertise go no further than "I did it with my kids, and they've survived so far"... but IMO that would be fine. It's been in the fridge, and I assume you made it up correctly with scalding water this morning? In which case no worries at all. I wouldn't keep it any longer than 24 hours though.


Seems a bit of a waste to buy powdered formula to use such a small quantity though? With my 2nd (where I couldn't be bothered expressing) I went straight to the baby porridge type cereals that have milk powder included, so you just add water.

Oooooh I didn't know about this porridge stuff... shall look into it as yes, it is a faff. I made it as per instructions (boil kettle, let it cool for 30 mins, mix powder into water etcetcetc...). Reminded me why I prefer breastfeeding - am too lazy for all the faff!

In terms of formula safety the important thing is to include the scalding stage.. if you are unable to make the milk fresh as per the official advice then the recommended fallback (as per Food Standards Agency) is to keep hot water in a flask, or to chill the made up formula and store it in the fridge for a short time.


Ironically, what is not recommended at all ever is to make milk up with cooled boiled water ... but it seems to be so common. I really don't understand why people do that ...but that's the little bee I have in my bonnet (work colleague had her grand daughter seriously ill with gastro enteritis that was linked to formula so I do harp on about it rather)


Sorry to hijack your thread!!

No, that's right FM. That's HOT water at the recommended temp to kill any nasty bacteria in the powder.


COOLED boiled water is pretty much cold.. you know you see people with a bottle prefilled with water, topping it with powder from a special little pot? Boiling the water but then using it cold sort of assumes the dangerous bacteria are in the water supply, as opposed to the formula powder. I think there is still a belief the powder is 'sterile'

Mellors Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I confess I always made mine in the past by adding

> a bit of boiling water straight from the kettle,

> shaking it then topping up to the right level with

> cold water straight from the tap.


Probably safer than the cooled boiled water option

At least you put hot water on the powder!

There have been done very high profile cases with contaminated powder, Laura


I tend to think of it along the lines of advice to cook chicken thoroughly


I think if your bottles aren't sterilised but washed in the dishwasher and you wash your own hands thoroughly before doing the prep then the chances of anything nasty getting into the feed are slim ... But if there can be factory contamination of the powder with dangerous bacteria then that mIght be too much of a risk for you


I think it's a question of informed consent though


There is just so much confusion ... Doesn't help

if you put boiling water on formula powder you just destroy all the proteins (above 60/70 degrees?)

so no real point in drinking it if there's no good stuff in it


as for the high profile cases re the nasty bacteria that only dies at 70 degress... they're just not htat high profile. i have never come across any from the UK and considering 97% of babies are fed formula... i just take that risk rather than destroy the proteins in the milk powder


but it's everyone's individual decision of course

I presume when the food standards agency did all thd microbiological testing to determine the safest way they took into account the nutritional value of thd made up feed


What makes you think heat destroys protein, saila?


Most protein is cooked before eating - meat, fish, eggs..


If you drink hot milk it has the same nutritional value as cold, surely


I would bD interested to see where you got that information from

Just had a quick google


If you actually boil cows milk for several minutes the proteins start to denature .. This actually makes them

More digestible


Baby formula has already been ultra heat treated at several stages in the manufacturing process


I think you are worrying unnecessarily saila, thinking it best not to follow the preparation advice because of an unfounded fear


I know this is a bit of a diversion but I find it really fascinating, the way that people respond to health information

Fuschia - it's basic biology that water above a certain temperature denatures proteins.


formula powder is very carefully constructed and the levels of the fats and proteins are vital for a growing baby. If you start destroying some of the protein content, the baby is not getting the levels that have been recommended.


If it wasn't an issue, the instructions wouldn't specifically say NOT boiling water but 72 degrees (or whatever it is) because at this temperature you just about destroy that one bacteria, that one VERY RARE bacteria, that they have to mention to cover their backs... Instead it would just say "add boiling water"


What they dont do is inform you WHY they have this '72 degrees' as an insturction, cos most mums would then understand that the risk of the VERY RARE bacteria probalby doesn't out weigh the fact you're destroying a number of proteins in teh milk if you add boiling water.


EDIT to say - the action of boiling is to remove the bacteria from the water - the majority of bacteria during the making process is in teh tap water - not from the factory. there's just this REALLY rare one that they have to talk about so they dont get sued. But with NO incidents in the UK - should we realy be concerned? should we really sacrifice the specific level of proteins for this one very small risk?

The advice is not to use boiling water though

Water cooled for up to 30ons will be at the right temp


There is no evidence that this affects thd nutritional quality of the feed at all


In fact I think if you delve into the production of the formula it goes through several

Stages make the cows milk proteins more digestible

>The advice is not to use boiling water though



... exactly....


1) you're meant to boil the water to destroy the many many many bacteria that are in tap water THEN


2) let it stand until it cools to approx 72 degrees (?) cos this is hot enough to kill that one bacteria but cool enough not to destroy the proteins



plus loads of mums make up their feeds in a perfect breeding ground for bacteria (i.e. infant formula in warm milk) and then reheat it later in the day!! - makes no sense to me cos any contamination from the bottle or milk powder just grows and grows.... it's a breeding ground right there.


taking all the info on board (cos there's no clear answer) i personally boil the water (removing the bacteria from the tap water) after i make up a feed. Then use that water for the next feed. and so on. I've ignored the likelihood of that one bacteria that dies at 72 cos life's too short and it's just too unlikely and too ridiculous to get up an hour before you make a feed to watch water cool to 72 degrees...


anyway - i'm going to watch glastonbury now and smile that i'm not there!



Fuschia - the advice is not to use boiling hot water BECAUSE it destroys the proteins... blimey.... - have i said that before???! why on earth do they say wait for it to cool. Does that make sense?

There's a few bacteria that are a risk within the formula


Big yes, follow the advice and you minimise the risk of making the baby I'll


Deciding not to follow that advice because you think using hot water might destroy the proteins seems a bit muddled to me... Given that the advice is based on solid research


But I confess I am a bit OCD on the science of these thIngs and spend far too much time looking into it all


Definitely what that Fsa research calls a 'purist' I guess!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But they were going to cut down a tree that had no notice on it ? Either way thank goodness people intervened. My total lack of confidence in Southwark tree dept is justified it would seem… 
    • Hopefully the confusion won’t lead to injury. 
    • To clarify a few points- I didn't just happen to be passing, I saw the workmen setting up equipment worryingly close to the tree from my front window, so put my shoes on and headed over there as quickly as possible just in case. Unfortunately they had already lopped a few branches off in the two minutes it took me to get there. Although I didn't see them attach a notice, the wording on the notice pictured above has the same terminology that they used with me - fungal brackets - so presumably it was them. I have no idea who removed the sign, or why. Also worth mentioning that they were third party contractors, carrying out work orders from the council. I'm a bit confused by the 'mistaken tree' comments, as Councillor Renata Hamvas posted on a Facebook thread that she had raised the issue with the relevant council officers, and that the response she received is that the tree does have a fungal infection. So there seems to be conflicting info there, and I'm concerned that the tree is still in danger.
    • To be fair, do we know who put the notice on the wrong tree? The people wielding chainsaws almost certainly won't be the experts  who identify  the problems with the trees? They just go along and hack down what they're told to hack down? I might be wrong, but whilst actual tree surgery needs expertise, I wouldn't have thought hacking down a whole tree did? Apart from knowing how to use a chainsaw, obviously.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...