Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Since December we?ve noticed there is a new pipe going into the river Peck, at the point where it emerges into Peckham Rye Park. The attached picture seems to suggest is connected to the waste facilities of the new building.


At this point, we are a little bit concerned as children and dogs play in the river, in case it?s raw sewage.


Can anybody shed any light about this?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/
Share on other sites

No septic tank would be allowed to disgorge straight into a river like that, by design they are sealed and are emptied by being pumped out. It could be a field drain outlet (used to take away excess rain water) - in which case, as long as the land isn't contaminated, it wouldn't be a problem.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1213758
Share on other sites

bacgj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Since December we?ve noticed there is a new pipe

> going into the river Peck, at the point where it

> emerges into Peckham Rye Park. The attached

> picture seems to suggest is connected to the waste

> facilities of the new building.

>

> At this point, we are a little bit concerned as

> children and dogs play in the river, in case it?s

> raw sewage.

>

> Can anybody shed any light about this?


Why not ask the site manager. The contractor is Neilcott. The site managers number is 07958 514211

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1213778
Share on other sites

pipsky2008 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bacgj Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Since December we?ve noticed there is a new

> pipe

> > going into the river Peck, at the point where

> it

> > emerges into Peckham Rye Park. The attached

> > picture seems to suggest is connected to the

> waste

> > facilities of the new building.

> >

> > At this point, we are a little bit concerned as

> > children and dogs play in the river, in case

> it?s

> > raw sewage.

> >

> > Can anybody shed any light about this?

>

> Why not ask the site manager. The contractor is

> Neilcott. The site managers number is 07958 514211


Also consider contacting Peckham Rye ward councillors, Cllr Dr Hamvas, Cllr Mills and Cllr Edwards and environmental health if you have serious concerns regarding poisoning of watercourses.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1213968
Share on other sites

This is interesting - I had exactly the same concerns about this pipe. For years it has been there and it has just been water that came out. Since the building work started there were other materials (sand?) coming out, but I thought that it was part and parcel of the temporary land disturbance. The building seems pretty finished, but there is still occasionally some sort of pollution (cement dust? plaster dust?) I took this photo on Thursday and sent it to the park warden voicing my concerns. ( I have seen this sort of cloudiness twice before) If it is either of the above then they could be harmful to wildlife.


good idea to send to the site manager though and thank you for the number above

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1214057
Share on other sites

I don?t think is a field water drainage pipe. If you look at the picture it is a new pipe, it is connected to the new building via a large tank with a cover, which you can see in the background. Also, the material coming out is some sort of synthetic substance, picture attached.


I have written to Southwark council environmental services so the can test it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1216008
Share on other sites

bacgj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don?t think is a field water drainage pipe. If

> you look at the picture it is a new pipe, it is

> connected to the new building via a large tank

> with a cover, which you can see in the background.

> Also, the material coming out is some sort of

> synthetic substance, picture attached.

>

> I have written to Southwark council environmental

> services so the can test it.


Did you speak to the site manager on the number I gave above?


It could be super saturated subsoil clay. that has become liquid, like a slip. Excavations can often put the subsoil on top of topsoil in ground works on back filling, if done lazily. This, if it is the case, could give the waste water a milky appearance.


In your second photo. I don't think you can necessarily come to a conclusion about the connection you have made. Do you know for sure that the two are joined.


Again, why not speak to the site manager

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1216073
Share on other sites

P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's the issue with the OP reporting to the

> council? I certainly wouldn't contact a site

> manager in that situation in case they were doing

> something they shouldn't and reacted badly.


I did suggest the OP contact Environmental health and / or Peckham Rye ward councillors in my reply to OP of the 21/1/18 P.O.U.S, if they had serious concerns about poisoning of watercourses.


Peckham Rye ward councillor, Cllr Dr Hamvas took up the matter on the 22/1/18 and said they would get back to us


I do support the OP in raising this issue and hope reports and water purity analysis data can be posted by the OP/ward councillor when received from environmental services.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1216770
Share on other sites

Today I was with my dog at the very spot that the pipe comes out of Peck Riverbank. Lo and behold a van

Drives up with 'Drainage' emblazoned on the size. Contractors working on the site it seems?

I asked them specifically about the pipe: they said it was absolutely nothing to worry about and that it was

There to drain off excess water from the soil underneath the buildings and the surrounding area,

Designed to improve the drainage of the land and make subsidence less likely

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1216792
Share on other sites

I have sent my pictures to the site manager but no response yet. Those last images look particularly worrying

Glad the drainage people are looking into it. Of course they?ll say it?s nithing to worry about

(They won?t admit if it is !!) but fingers crossed they will put it right

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1216797
Share on other sites

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's clay slip, as the wet ground settles.


I tend to agree, liquid clay and silt deposits. There are three other piped outlets very near by that I have seen. A couple at least that are older and concreted in.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1217094
Share on other sites

Hi all,

below is the response I received:



There are numerous pipes that flow into the stream, some are from land drainage around the park and two are from the Sewage treatment plants that service the adventure playground and the new building. One of these can be seen in the back ground of the picture in the initial forum post. The plant uses naturally occurring micro- organisms to treat the sewage and only releases clean water. Any solid matter is removed separately as you would with a septic tank. The outlet from the adventure playground has been in place since that building was built and the testing we have had carried out to the outflow shows it is working correctly with no risk to the health of the stream.




Renata

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180396-river-peck/#findComment-1217986
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...