Jump to content

Wanted - Tax advice in relation to residential property letting


Isserlis

Recommended Posts

Can anyone recommend a tax expert/accountant who can give advice on tax liability in relation to residential property letting? I may have to let or sell my house later this year due to a job move and need to know what the tax situation would be. Many thanks!

There is basic info on the HMRC website if you feel like looking into this yourself. In summary if you let your house and then sell it, depending on timings you may have to pay capital gains tax on a portion of the gain relating to the let period, but there are a number of rules as to the time held etc. You would also need to give consideration to the impact of second home stamp duty if you bought elsewhere, having let your first property out.



Alternatively, any accountants locally should be able to give you basic advice on this, together with details as to the filing obligations you'd have as a landlord for tax purposes and what services they could offer around drawing up accounts /tax returns.


Providing your house has been your principal private residence throughout the whole time you have held it and up to the point you sell, there should be no tax on the sale.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...