Jump to content

Bush Multi Cyclonic Bagless Cylinder Vacuum Cleaner ?20 collection only


faedunphy

Recommended Posts

Purchased this 6 months ago, upgraded to a Henry. Great first hoover. ?20 collection only from SE21 (West Dulwich).


http://www.argos.co.uk/product/6111577?storeID=115&cmpid=GS001&_$ja=tsid:59157|cid:596237456|agid:30099226953|tid:pla-319738745924|crid:94121996433|nw:g|rnd:9147246817181475571|dvc:c|adp:1o3|mt:|loc:9073583&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIh_y5pvzc2AIVTLftCh2b7AS0EAQYAyABEgI7SfD_BwE


This cyclonic bagless vacuum cleaner by Bush boasts a triple A efficiency rating with excellent hard floor performance. It's easy to store and sits perfectly on stairs so you won't have to stretch the hose trying to reach those pesky middle steps! With a HEPA filter, easy to empty dust container and multiple nozzles this no fuss compact vacuum cleaner is suitable for carpets, hard floors and upholstery.


Multi Cyclone Technology.


AAA - High Efficiency.


Washable outlet HEPA filter.


Easy empty dust container.


Multi cyclonic technology.

HEPA filter.

Side suction for edge to edge cleaning.

Length of hose 1.5m.

Hose stretches up to 1.5m.

Sits on stairs for easy stair cleaning.

Dust capacity 1.5 litres.

Antibacterial.

Automatic cord rewind.

Foot operated cord rewind.

Adjustable floorhead.

Includes crevice nozzle, dusting brush, combination floor nozzle.

Metal telescopic extension tubes.

Suitable for carpets, hard floors, stairs and upholstery.

5m power cord.

Size H38.8, W28.3, D32.9cm.

Weight 4.2kg.

Carpet pick up rating: D.

Hard floor pick up rating: A.

Overall energy rating: A.

Total emissions: A.

DB79 noise level.

25 kWh usage per year.

Manufacturer's 2 year guarantee.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is it a terrible place for teenagers?
    • Well, if you ever find yourself visiting, let us know 
    • Before I switched, if memory serves there was some sort of thing on Thames Water's website which you could use to determine whether or not you would be better off with a meter. No idea if it's still there. Also, I have a vague recollection that if you found you were worse off financially with the meter after a certain time period, you could switch back. Have I imagined that? Whatever, I don't actually recall hearing of anyone who thought they were worse off with a meter, though I'm sure there must be some.
    • Don't move to Southwark at all, save yourselves while you still can. Terrible place for teenagers, IMO.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...