Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We would deffo use this station more if access were better. I used to go there with Little Saff in the sling, but she's getting a bit heavy for my bad back now (14 kg and 89 cm tall at just 17 months!). Mr Saff once went out in the buggy only to forget about monumental stairs. He had to bump Little Saff in her buggy up and down the stairs from the far side of the station. Oh dear!.

Thanks, ClareC. I didn't know that about Denmark Hill. Obviously not a station I have used recently. I seem to recall that North Dulwich station isn't great either, but Herne Hill is not too bad for buggies. Does anyone know who uses them frequently?


Brockley station is stepfree for trains coming south from London Bridge, but not northbound to London Bridge. The station is under some renovations, so perhaps they will amend the northbound platform in the future?


Ladywell station is stepfree both directions. It's also adjacent to lovely Ladywell Fields which has two excellent play areas for toddlers and older children.

Ummm...


To accommodate the additional East London Line services, and to provide disabled access to all platforms of the station, substantial works are required at the station. A planning application was submitted to Bromley Council in February 2009, which will include alterations to the Victorian booking hall building, removal of the current ticket office, removal of the pedestrian bridge over Platforms 1 and 2 and new stairs to Platform 1. The original entrance and ticket hall will be brought back into use, with three lifts installed to provide access to the platforms and a new canopy will be installed over platforms 3-7.


So, for over two years a project has been underway to substantially renovate a Grade II historic building. Patience people.


So that petition is worthless since it's happening anyway. And that's not a criticism of Otta or whoever else has signed it but just to alert you to the fact that it'll amount to a hill of beans.


As for the other stations mentioned, the same problems apply. Often old or listed buildings with limited space that would cost extortionate amounts of money to refurb with disabled access (which is essentially what you'd need for buggies too). This cost would have to passed on to the passengers who are already paying hefty fares. Not to mention the inconvenience caused by the work.


I'm afraid, given that the vast number of train users are non-buggy/able bodied and at peak hours, the economics don't add up.

I think the legal standpoint is that reasonable efforts have to be made. But, for example, there are some older tube stations that it is just not possible to retro-fit lifts or wheelchair friendly escalators.


And obviously considerations have to be made for Crystal Palace being a listed building - you can't just knock it down however you feel like.


I suspect, given that planning permission has been approved, money is the factor here for Southern Trains.

The law is a bit hazy around disability access. I think in order to not put small businesses out of business, they accepted "reasonable effort" (such as a shop keeper coming outside and tking an order from a wheelchair user, if the chair can't get in to the shop itself. However, when it comes to a large company, I think there would be less sympathy.


Unfortunately though, the legislation can be interpretted in different wys.

CP has trains to London Bridge, Victoria and the Ginger line, surely someone should think soon about the passengers around CP... a lot of them are parents with kids and some with disabilities, but my gut feel this may not be anytime soon, I did sign the petition though, you never know!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But they were going to cut down a tree that had no notice on it ? Either way thank goodness people intervened. My total lack of confidence in Southwark tree dept is justified it would seem… 
    • Hopefully the confusion won’t lead to injury. 
    • To clarify a few points- I didn't just happen to be passing, I saw the workmen setting up equipment worryingly close to the tree from my front window, so put my shoes on and headed over there as quickly as possible just in case. Unfortunately they had already lopped a few branches off in the two minutes it took me to get there. Although I didn't see them attach a notice, the wording on the notice pictured above has the same terminology that they used with me - fungal brackets - so presumably it was them. I have no idea who removed the sign, or why. Also worth mentioning that they were third party contractors, carrying out work orders from the council. I'm a bit confused by the 'mistaken tree' comments, as Councillor Renata Hamvas posted on a Facebook thread that she had raised the issue with the relevant council officers, and that the response she received is that the tree does have a fungal infection. So there seems to be conflicting info there, and I'm concerned that the tree is still in danger.
    • To be fair, do we know who put the notice on the wrong tree? The people wielding chainsaws almost certainly won't be the experts  who identify  the problems with the trees? They just go along and hack down what they're told to hack down? I might be wrong, but whilst actual tree surgery needs expertise, I wouldn't have thought hacking down a whole tree did? Apart from knowing how to use a chainsaw, obviously.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...