Damian H Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Loz Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Tarot Wrote:> --------------------------------------------------> -----> > Take for example the freeview x-rated porno> > sites,fed into every home.> > Do you mean the phone line channels? X-rated? > Good grief. Google 'x-rated' and I suspect you'll> find a couple of websites that'll make your false> teeth fall out.> > And the porn/rape link theory was trashed years> ago.Loz is quite right here. One of the chapters in the book I referred to earlier, Bad Girls and Dirty Pictures, does a pretty extensive overview of the research into a supposed rape/porn connection and the compelling evidence is that the completely opposite state of affairs is the case - the avalability of sexually explicit material is associated with a decrease in crimes of sexual violence. The governments know that but it doesn't suit their agenda. A very extensive Home Office study was commissioned in the 1980s (think it was the 80s, might have been the 90s) which reviewed all the available evidence, refuted any connection between porn and sexual violence and recommended the legalisation of pornongraph. When presented to the government of the day (who were clearly hoping for an opposite conclusion to justify a populist stance against porn) the report was promptly ignored! Same with the US. Major scientific study commissioned by the government of the day failed to find a connection. That didnt suit the government so they commissioned a second report that more or less abandoned scientific method and instead focused on various weepy anecdotes from people "destroyed by pornography".The real, proper, scientific and anthropological evidence is as Loz says it is. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445802 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huguenot Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Think you're gonna need to back that Damian H ;-) Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445822 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Huguenot Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Think you're gonna need to back that Damian H ;-)The evidence is easily available for anyone who wants to find it - I have no intenio of doing anyone's research for them. The book I mentioned is a good start for anyone who is interesed. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445830 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huguenot Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 So you're not going to back it? Just an opinion then? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445831 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I think if you read my post and my reply to you you will see that I point you clearly in te direction of the evidence. Let me repeat it - 'Bad Girls and Dirty Pictures' by Avadon Carrol and Alison Assister. Whole chapter summarising the research on pornography and sexual violence by, if I recall, Alsion Reid from University of Reading.Another source would be the website of Feminists Against Censorship. Also search for the Home Office report into pornography - am sure it can be found smewher online.Am afraid I have not got the time or the nclination to distil decades of research and evidence for the benefit of the readers of this forum. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445833 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Let me make it easy - here is a starting point:http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/harm.htm Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445845 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huguenot Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Eh? That was an opinion piece too?Look, I'm not saying I disagree with you, but that reference has about as much validity as saying 'look what Huguenot said'. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445849 Share on other sites More sharing options...
RosieH Posted June 17, 2011 Author Share Posted June 17, 2011 Huguenot Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> that reference has about as much validity as saying 'look what Huguenot said'.*spits metaphorical tea*I never thought I'd see the day Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-445972 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 Huguenot Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Eh? That was an opinion piece too?> > Look, I'm not saying I disagree with you, but that> reference has about as much validity as saying> 'look what Huguenot said'.Huguenot, if you are incapable of extracting the research and facts from the opinion that accompanies it, that is not my fault. There is a very considerable amount in there that goes way beyond mere opinion. Re-read it and you will see that the findings and conclusions of a significant number of experts who have been appointed to look at this issue have been reported and directly contravene the populist notion that pornography leads to sexual violence. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446087 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jah Lush Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 A word to the wise Damian. Don't let Huguenot wind you up. He's just being a cunt because that's precisely what he is and he takes great enjoyment from it. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446106 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 Thanks JL - will bear that in mind. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446143 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarot Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 Pornography plays a key role in violent sexual crimes,its known that many murderers have been "turned on " by their interest in it.Peter Sutcliffe.Ian BradyMyra HindleyRose westFred WestTed Bundy,etc etc. where do they fit in all the trials. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446314 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJKillaQueen Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 But where is your evidence that any of them were murderers because of pornography Tarot? Pornography does not turn someone into a psychopath or serial killer. People with those psychological profiles develope them from an early age long before they ever come into contact with any pornography. Sexual/ violent abuse in childhood is far more likely to be a factor for many sadistic killers but the majority of children that are abused do not develop into sadistic murderers either. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446319 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loz Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 Tarot Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Pornography plays a key role in violent sexual> crimes,its known that many murderers have been> "turned on " by their interest in it.> Peter Sutcliffe.> Ian Brady> Myra Hindley> Rose west> Fred West> Ted Bundy,etc etc. where do they fit in all the> trials.Do you know what else? They all ate chips inside a one month period before murdering someone. Ban chips, I say.Or you could maybe just not mistake correlation for causation. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446323 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarot Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 No not everyone turns into sadistic murderers,but people with early signs of personality disorders,ei;cruelty to animals,bullies,disruptive,tendencies come into contact with pornography they can become sexual predators. The majority of sexually abused children do not go on to be abusers either.But many children are the victim of a lust filled adult who has looked at porn.Not enough thought is given to young children,by those who think its ok to corrupt them with lurid images everywhere. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446326 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loz Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 NOOOO! IT'S THE CHIPS! Ban them! Ban them! Won't SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN and BAN THE CHIPS!Wibble. Ptang. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446330 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJKillaQueen Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Tarot on this you are I'm afraid talking nonsense. Pornography is about as much a causal factor as eating chips. Use of pronography by deviant criminals is an extention of their deviance not the other way round and as Loz correctly says, the numder of serial killers is just a fraction of the population....so doesn't even really merit an attack on pornography. Far more people drop their crisp packets on the floor instead of putting them in a bin afterwards....so the banning of crisps has far more merit for my money. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446373 Share on other sites More sharing options...
RosieH Posted June 18, 2011 Author Share Posted June 18, 2011 Tarot, I take it you have written (or at least read) a peer reviewed study on this?I've said it before, I'll say it again, post hoc ergo propter hocBut Loz said it better: ban the chips. And sofa cushions. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446375 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Tarot Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> No not everyone turns into sadistic murderers,but> people with early signs of personality> disorders,ei;cruelty to> animals,bullies,disruptive,tendencies come into> contact with pornography they can become sexual> predators. > The majority of sexually abused children do not go> on to be abusers either.> But many children are the victim of a lust filled> adult who has looked at porn.> Not enough thought is given to young children,by> those who think its ok to corrupt them with lurid> images everywhere.Tarot, you are WAAAAAYYYY off here. You are confusing correlation wth causation which is an A level standard mistake in research terms.WHat you are talking about (withour knowing it, I imagine)is what is known as a Faciliator in the Minnesota (?) model of psychological crime. The Facilitator is anything that a perpetratr uses to get themselves into the frame of mind to move from fantasising about crime to actually carrying it out. It is true that pornography has been used by some killers and criminals as a Facilitator. Guess what else has? Alcohol, women's magazines, the Chrsitian Bible is a VERY popular one (especially the bok of Revelations) and Geoffrey Dahmer used as his Facilitatr the third Star Wars movie, especialy the scene when the Emperor telekinetically tortures Luke Skywalker.If you want to ban anything that has been used by such criminals to facilitate their crimes yu had better start with all alcohol, the Bible and all sci-fi fantasy films. Perhaps then you could move onto pornography.If you look at some of the evidence that is cited in the linksI posted you will actually see that a strong case can be made fr suggesting that pornography REDUCES sexual violence and increases co-operation. Laboratory research suggests this and anthropological evidence shows that in countries where porngraphy is unlawful incidence of sexual violence are very high in cmparison with societies where porngraphy is readily accesible. In the latter societies there are usually also significantly better social conditions and opprtunities for women as a whole.Sorry, Taro, but from every perspective the case that pornography is a causal factor in rape is simply a non-starter. Even the US and UK government investigations (some of the most extensive ever carried out) came to this cnclusion but were then bried by the respective governments as it didnt suit their social agendas. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446419 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Furthermore, your notion of "lurid images" "corrupting" young children hints at a very sex negative attitude. What is "corrupting" about children knowing about sexuality I wold suggest that the best way to "corrupt" children is to convey to them that sex is "lurid" and nasty and dirty.THAT is what is known as negative sexual socialisation and THAT is what the research finds is one of the most common patterns in the backgrounds of those who go on to become sexual criminals - an upbringing in which the criminal-to-be was taught that sex was bad and dirty and wicked.If you want to reduce the incidence of sexual violence I suggest you instead encourage a healthy, relaxed and enjoyable attitude to sex and sexuality in the younger generation. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446422 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Also in terms of Ted BUndy, bear in mind that Bundy did everything possible to distance himself from personal responsibility for his crimes.WHen he was confessing to the police he talked of himself in the third person, e.g: "He would then enter the dormitory..."I don't think that the efforts of an unstable multiple murderer who was attempting to externalise responsibility for his behaviour constitutes very compelling evidence.And....if we look into Bundy's background what do we find - negative sexual socialisation. Bundy was an illegitimate child who was raised by his grandparents to escape the social "stigma" of the circumstances of his birth. This led to a life-long resentment against his mother that seems to have been extended to many women.Furthermore, Bundy was a handsome, intelligent and successful person who was considered socially adept and charming. He had no shortage of female company if he simply needed to 'discharge' the urges stimulated by pornography. Bundy's motivation went far, far beyond a mere exposure to pornongraphy.I believe, however, that he was known to have consumed French Fries so maybe...... Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446431 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian H Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 So, if we want to avoid creating sexual criminals....let's stop being down on sex and expressions of sexuality in our culture and let's be careful not to stigmatise children born out of wedlock (altough I am glad to say I think a lot less of the latter happens today). Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446434 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyDeliah Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Well said Damien H. Nothing at all I could disagree with there. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446501 Share on other sites More sharing options...
StraferJack Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Tarot, I take it you have written (or at least read) a peer reviewed study on this? This was funny. Talking about peer reviewed study with someone called Tarot Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446502 Share on other sites More sharing options...
RosieH Posted June 18, 2011 Author Share Posted June 18, 2011 Well, StraferJack, I am hilarious. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17761-slutwalk/page/6/#findComment-446511 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now