Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What is wrong with you MP.....only those that like what you like now have taste? Just have a sensible discussion without trying to see insult in everything I write. Objective criticism is different to subjective criticism...that's ALL I am saying.


I can see your point Bob. I don't agree though that Glastonbury should be exlcusive for this type of show or that. I watched Julian Temple's Doc on Glastonbury the other day and that charts the festival's evolution brilliantly. And it's had to evolve just because of it's success more than anything. I think the thousand's of people in the crowd were more than happy to see Beyonce there. And for me, that Glastonbury now beings together such a diverse range and style of act I think is what a music festival should be all about - a celebration of everything that is music...no?

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's no problem with that MP but it's hard to

> have a discussion about talent in the face of that

> kind of prejudice. I tend to think that those who

> really love music can appreciate the best of any

> genre/ type of music.



I'm not sure the prejudice is aimed at her directly, it's more at the "Beyonce" package as a whole. Other artists get/suffer this too.


The glaring publicity we get steam rollered at us has run out of superlatives & comparisons, so it starts to look fake and disingenuous. In fact it irritates the hell out of some people, to such an extent that we develop a near subconcious knee-jerk rejection of the artist.


I personally have nothing against Beyonce but have I:


Bought her records? NO


Seen her live? NO


Even downloaded a track on my i-tunes? NO


However, I loved the show she did at Glasto. It was show business at its "showiest" & almost Vegas like. She is utterly gorgeous & talented.

Had Evil Kneivil* leapt over the Pyramid with her on the back of a flaming harley-davidson, whilst singing, would I have been suprised ? probably not.


So she and others suffer a "yeah, whatever" response to most of what they do. It's the flip side of over kill branding.


It looks mega-corp, it feels mega-corp and it is mega-corp.


And in that she's brilliant, absolutely excellent.



Nette(tu)



Evil Kneivil* I know.

But people often say someone is rubbish purley because they don't 'like' their music. And that's what irritates me. I don't particularly like the music of Lady Gaga, but that doesn't mean that she isn't good at what she does (she obviously is, and has a pretty good voice too).


And that's also my point about festivals.....if you go to an R'n'B festival...you expect to see R'n'B acts. Glastonbury has several stages and is diverse in what it offers. Beyonce is as much in place there as anyone else imo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...