Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hear that some of the more right on Glastonbury Festival goers are planning a protest against Sir Bonio's tax dodging. If I had realised I may have got a ticket, as it would have been worth going just for that. I was previously hopeful of getting tickest to Live8 or Live Earth or whatever it was called so I could publicly rip up (or burn) the ticket outside Hyde Park. Personally I'd happily protest just because he is a annoying gobs*ite.


Can all of you going join in the proest on my behalf please?


As for his musical talent here's one I made earlier: www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfKgooVacz8

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17675-u2-glastonbury-tax-protest/
Share on other sites

Worth noting that until 2006, artists in Ireland were tax exempt. You can't really blame Bono for the fact that the celtic tiger is now whimpering. And anyway the Stones have long had the same arrangement with a Netherlands domicile, ltd co and low corporation tax but they don't get any stick because they are cool.


Granted he can be a bit of a %$?& but there are more deserving targets for this type of protest than Bono.

You are off the mark there Mr B my friend, the exemption you refer to is intended to apply to small time musicians and only applies to 250k pa which is a small percentage of U2s annual income of many squillions.


They use Netherlands double tax traties and pay little tax in their home country. As they are unwilling to pay Irish taxes the man in the street picks up his extra share of the bill, which he can ill afford.


So much for them being Irish heroes. Take, take, take (and very publically try to help Africa while letting down their home country).


The comparison with Rolling Stones is wrong too as RS moved to France when the tax rate here was 85%. U2 feel a corporate tax rate of 12.5 % in Ireland is too much for them. Shameful.

Mickster - you're correct in that the Irish tax exemption was (and still is) intended to benefit and support smaller artists with average incomes i.e. < 25,000 Euros and not corporate behemoths like U2. However the 250k limit you refer to was only introduced in 2007...for 30 odd years before that it was zero. U2 would have benefited from that when they started out back in the 80's. Perhaps when they got their success (insert arbitrary number here) they should have stuck their hand up and offered to exempt themselves from the artists exemption and pay the government more tax - but who has ever done that?


If they were truly a band of conscience, then perhaps they could have taxed themselves in kind, by setting up some kind of visible charitable foundation but the press would have panned them for that too. Their regular donations like the 5Million euros this year to Music Generation (Irish charity to help Musicians) go largely unnoticed. In many ways they can't win.


I don't doubt for a second that Bono's a twat and guilty of rank hypocrisy. Didn't he fly his hat half way around the world by private jet? Surely the mark of a man lost in his own rectum. But the average man on the street in Ireland is struggling because of property greed, corruption and ill monetary policy throughout the system.


From the politicians to your average Joe who took a massive remortgage to fund some nice holidays and new car or whatever. Laying the financial woes of Ireland on Bono just seems a bit harsh and misguided.


The Art uncut protest at Glasto is a protest at the use of what is legal off shore financial planning to be tax efficient. It's what every incorporated entity has been doing for the last century; banks, insurance companies, telecos, rock stars, children's novelists. They're entitled to their view but I'd rather Art had a pop at the politicians, legislators and regulators instead.


Mick - My Rolling Stones example was based on their use of Netherlands holding company structure similar to that of U2 and run by the same people (Promogroup). Between 1986 and 2006 the Stones paid less than ?5M tax on earnings of approx ?235 Million. Granted, Jagger steers clear of the Mandela/Geldof political posturing but when it comes to the cash he's just as guilty. Yet because Brown Sugar's better than "When Love comes to Town" we kind of let them off don't we?

Mick Jagger is famously money-oriented, and does nothing for nothing. But he doesn't set himself up as an arbiter of ethics. Bono is getting bad publicity because he spends a lot of time admonishing people and governments for not doing more to help others. Other than that, I agree with Mr. Ben.

The point is about double standards, see my first post.


I know a fair bit about offshore tax structures too Mr B, but the point is not the nature of their tax structure, but the principle that as soon as they no longer benefit from the artists tax exemption, we see them trying to avoid their home country responsibilities.


Having benefitted from the exemption for so many years you would think they would be winning to pay their bit now, but no, apparently not.


They cultivate image of being chartiable but charity begins at home and in these times of great difficulty for the people of Ireland I find their reluctance to pay their way astonishing. Noone is blaming U2 for Irelands financials woes - I don't know where you got that from.

An oldie but a goldie.


Mick - I was clearly exaggerating on him taking the blame for Ireland. My point is that despite being a twat and dabbling in politics he's a soft, lazy target when there are other more worthy ones out there (if that's their beef).


And as Art Uncuts argument is about rightful financial contributions (and not who is the biggest knobhead) I just don't see how the Stones are any better. Surely they'd also be worthy of equal wrath?


As anyone who's been will know, each Glasto needs a public villain to fuel the fires of the right on massive. It's either Jay-Z, George Bush or anyone who pees in the stream. They'll all still get off their tits and enjoy it all the same.

Glastonbury festival goers protesting? What are they going to do, refuse to pay by credit card? Ignore the official phone app? Snub the ?15 t-shirts? or really let them have it and flash mob the 'recycling team'?


This must not be allowed - next thing you know there'll be picnic rage at Glyndebourne and sit-ins at the Proms.

back on subjet, the alchemists of inoffensive Rawk lite use the same tax set up in the Netherlands as Trafigura.


Trafigura just dumps its toxic shite in West Africa, U2 shovel their rancid shite on a global level and then proceed to lecture on the evils of global capital.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...