Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Two adults and two children came to my door this afternoon asking for sponsorship for a walk in taking place in Dulwich Park on Sunday. I looked at the forms and asked a few questions and was happy to hand over a tenner. It all looked genuine enough except the woman told me that the school/club organising the event - fundraising for the Japanese Tsunami - was called Colwell. I Googled it and nothing came up!


Anyone else get a call? Anyone else heard about the sponsored walk? Have I been conned by a family - surely not!!



* My previous post was removed with no explanation! How can this sort of post offend? I'd like to know!!! *

because obviously a small school/club walk won't have any online presence. have you perhaps miss heard the name? seems daft that people are willing to hand over money and ask questions later, and then find it necessary to moan about it online as though it's something they couldn't of prevented.
That's a bit harsh. There was a spate of scams a while ago, I got caught twice, I only realised they were a con when I heard other peoples stories on here. It's worth knowing about. A woman on your doorstep with a baby at 10.00pm needing to borrow ten pounds so she can charge up her electricity key and a woman in floods of tears needing money to buy food for her children. Very plausible and a superb actress.

sambless:- I have been scammed on the doorstep before so why did I hand over a tenner this time? A young well-dressed asian family knocked on the door - husband?, wife?, two 8 year old? girls - they were very polite, confident and believable. They told me what they were doing, I looked at the sponsorship form and all looked very genuine. I suppose I could have witheld my sponsorship money until they had completed the walk giving me time to make checks but right now I still don't know if they were genuine. Perhaps I shouldn't hand money over to anybody that 'rattles a tin' on the doorstep from now on.


Moos:- You're right I was lounged but haven't a clue why. I can understand threads about Glastonbury, Kite surfing and Reggae residing next to the sofa but a topic that relates directly to East Dulwich and perhaps helping to prevent a local crime should be up there with the petrol thefts, strange beeps and how many houses Foxtons have sold :-)

Judging by a recent post by admin on a similar topic (see 'About This Forum'), it may have been done by mistake in a quick-round cleanup if someone thought it was a generic thread not an ED one - the moderator team don't have time to read all posts. Do click 'report this thread' and ask for it to be moved back if you're not happy.
I was approached by a young Asian girl (not Japanese) last week in a local shop, and asked for sponsorship for Japan. I declined because that is my default position, and because she wasn't very articulate about what it was for. However, I didn't suspect a scam.

You're right - but my point remains valid. these scams everywhere rely on saying "whereweareseville" to lower people'e defences. To my eyes it doesn't make it a local issue. But nor am I arguing this thread should be lounged. It's just one of several threads where I've seen people ask "WHY WHERE WHO?"


It's still not as bad as Nunhead Forum tho - where admin only has to cough and people ask why such a cough had to be heard in Nunhead and why if he coughs they can't cough too

But noone ever wants to discuss generic cons - they want to discuss if the one they have been subjected to is specific. Which makes every thing generic (to me)


But it sounds like I'm trying to argue with you (and the OP) - but I'm really not. I was just trying to take a more high-level viewpoint. I'm not trying to admonish anyone


But I agree with you totally about how hard it is for Admin

not related to this thread in any way. I put a post in this section on friday night 5ish warning that the trains to ED where up the spout, it lasted about 10 mins before it got lounged. I see that as a ED issue, think admin has been a bit silly this week, moving nearly everthing of this section.
  • 4 weeks later...
If anyone out there gets a call from these people and is able to PM me or post on this thread immediately with a street and a time (if I'm online) I'll be on my bike and straight over. I'll watch them from a distance and call the police. I want to catch these thieving buggers!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • V interesting ArchieCarlos.   The UK is #1 at blocking and delaying investment (per the article I linked to above).  This means we have pretty much the lowest gross fixed capital formation in the developed world and the economic results are there for all to see (this led to the nihilistic political environment that enabled Brexit which made things even worse). Some of this blocking and delaying is well intentioned and aimed at a better outcome but much of it a smokescreen to prevent any investment at all and is a money-spinner for consultants and lawyers. According to the FT the new Kent tunnel has cost £1.2bn so far even before construction starts of which £800m has been on consultants, planning and legal fees.  359,080 pages of documentation!  This does not compare favourably with much more complex tunneling projects in countries like Norway or Germany.
    • Hello We've been let down by our surveyor who didn't look at the loft as they said their ladder wasn't tall enough - we're about to exchange but are keen to check the loft/roof before! Does anyone near to Melbourne Grove have a tall ladder we could borrow for an hour tomorrow around 3?   Thanks so much! This forum is the best, secured in 15 minutes! 
    • Trump is driving a wedge between the UK and EU. 
    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...