Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello SE23!


As you know, we have been pushing for more train services for Peckham Rye, Nunhead, Crofton Park, Catford and beyond.


We are now in the last phase of the Thameslink consultation, and need 3,000 people to say they support the calls for more trains at weekends too as well as weekdays, all before the deadline of 20th December


In addition to this, we are also calling on Southeastern trains to provide more services to London Victoria to give everyone real choice and reliability for their journeys, as well as protect the existing services we have when their franchise changes next year.


To add your voice, just follow this link:


http://shoutout.wix.com/so/cM0Hh83a


Thank you!


A Cinderella Line

How does this affect uses in SE22/15/21 who generally use N and E Dulwich and Peckham Rye and Denmark Hill stations, none of which are mentioned in the page from the link? By signing for more trains from these stations would people be then taking trains away from the stations I just mentioned?

I've signed this. Both the Thameslink and Victoria trains serve Nunhead, Peckham Rye and Denmark Hill. There is the ridiculous they've put a 20 and a 10 minute gap for someone to add in another train , with no back-up to the potential of more trains eg who would run this service, when it would start. I can see the one after the 20 minute being busier, therefore being delayed so you'll have eg a 25 minute gap and a 5 minute gap (This is going on Thameslink's usual reliability) Also weekends a frequent through London service is needed on Thameslink. I am still concerned about the Victoria service, I've not seen any feedback since the last consultation.


This is all happening now as the new timetable for the very very overdue Thameslink 2000 project is being finalised.

Renata

  • 2 weeks later...

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How does this affect uses in SE22/15/21 who

> generally use N and E Dulwich and Peckham Rye and

> Denmark Hill stations, none of which are mentioned

> in the page from the link? By signing for more

> trains from these stations would people be then

> taking trains away from the stations I just

> mentioned?



Hi Nigello, This will not take away services from these stations, in fact this is for services that run through Denmark Hill and Peckham Rye - You can find more about the full consultation on the Thameslink website: https://www.transformingrail.com/


We hope this helps!

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've signed this. Both the Thameslink and Victoria

> trains serve Nunhead, Peckham Rye and Denmark

> Hill. There is the ridiculous they've put a 20 and

> a 10 minute gap for someone to add in another

> train , with no back-up to the potential of more

> trains eg who would run this service, when it

> would start. I can see the one after the 20 minute

> being busier, therefore being delayed so you'll

> have eg a 25 minute gap and a 5 minute gap (This

> is going on Thameslink's usual reliability) Also

> weekends a frequent through London service is

> needed on Thameslink. I am still concerned about

> the Victoria service, I've not seen any feedback

> since the last consultation.

>

> This is all happening now as the new timetable for

> the very very overdue Thameslink 2000 project is

> being finalised.

> Renata


Hi Renata,


The gaps will be for the future franchise holder of Southeastern to provide an infill service. The Franchise gets renewed in December 2018, and so we are in the process of campaigning to the new potential franchise holders to provide the infill services as soon as they take over.


With regards to the Victoria services, we have started a petition to both protect and enhance the current Victoria trains. Please sign and share our petition for this here: https://www.change.org/p/david-statham-more-victoria-trains-for-crofton-park-the-catford-loop


We hope this helps!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe that Crown Post Offices are normally owned by the Post Office, and are frequently in valuable high street sites, so I would not be surprised if their sale value (or rentals to be derived if not sold) would be enticing, particularly for those offices running at slim or no profit margins. Happy to be proven wrong, of course. 
    • The name has got a 50s feel about it so in my mind it’s for older people who have very specific concerns. Nothing wrong with that. 
    • There is also one for Goose green https://www.police.uk/pu/your-area/metropolitan-police-service/goose-green/?yourlocalpolicingteam=your-team Disclaimer: only passing on what I have found by searching. No involvement in organising it.  
    • It is a challenge.  These sorts of services are increasingly expensive to deliver as fewer and fewer people use them.  Most people don't want to have to go back to using their lunch hour to queue up at the bank or Post Office.  So the options  are - reduce the service, make it more expensive or the tax payer subsidises it.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...