Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So five criteria:


1-peaceful good area

2-affordable to rent a 1/2 bedroom flat/house

3-with max.45 min train journey to London

4-surrounded by beautiful countryside

5-not necessary to buy a car to move around


I would say that this place doesn?t exist but there are lots of places fitting 4 of the 5 criteria. Decide which you are most willing to compromise on and go from there.


There are some lovely places in the East Surrey countryside by-the-way but if you want to keep requirements 1 and 2 you are going to have to get rid of requirement 5.

No, not joke, is a nice place and except for the train journey thing, it fits the bill, and it is also on the fast train to London if you change at Faversham so journey can be speedier......just trying to be helpful......are there "in" jokes about Whitstable then?

Ashford, Kent


1. peaceful (not gorgeous)

2. at least half the price of London

3. 37 minutes to London (St. Pancras)

4. surrounded by beautiful, truly beautiful countryside

5. definitely don't need a car


and 6. easy quick access to sea by train - take your pick of seaside towns

and 7. lovely Canterbury is 15 minutes by train for theatre/shopping/restaurants

and 8. quick train access to loads of lovely villages


Check it out, but don't judge by the walk from the train station because that is really grim.

Kennington area is nice.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> are there "in" jokes about Whitstable then?


I think so. It seems to stem from this: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,673056,673056#msg-673056


and/or other Snorky moments

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
    • Was the driver still with it when the police arrived?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...