Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So five criteria:


1-peaceful good area

2-affordable to rent a 1/2 bedroom flat/house

3-with max.45 min train journey to London

4-surrounded by beautiful countryside

5-not necessary to buy a car to move around


I would say that this place doesn?t exist but there are lots of places fitting 4 of the 5 criteria. Decide which you are most willing to compromise on and go from there.


There are some lovely places in the East Surrey countryside by-the-way but if you want to keep requirements 1 and 2 you are going to have to get rid of requirement 5.

No, not joke, is a nice place and except for the train journey thing, it fits the bill, and it is also on the fast train to London if you change at Faversham so journey can be speedier......just trying to be helpful......are there "in" jokes about Whitstable then?

Ashford, Kent


1. peaceful (not gorgeous)

2. at least half the price of London

3. 37 minutes to London (St. Pancras)

4. surrounded by beautiful, truly beautiful countryside

5. definitely don't need a car


and 6. easy quick access to sea by train - take your pick of seaside towns

and 7. lovely Canterbury is 15 minutes by train for theatre/shopping/restaurants

and 8. quick train access to loads of lovely villages


Check it out, but don't judge by the walk from the train station because that is really grim.

Kennington area is nice.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> are there "in" jokes about Whitstable then?


I think so. It seems to stem from this: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,673056,673056#msg-673056


and/or other Snorky moments

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...