Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most of the attacks on Clegg seem to be utterly witless.


It seems the emotional projectile diarrhoea that was triggered by the death of Diana seems to have permeated every aspect of British society.


It's as if every moron thinks they have a valid opinion that should shouted from the roof tops, regardless of how poorly informed or gormless they are.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17255-clegg/#findComment-435725
Share on other sites

Clegg: an honourable man who chose to lead a a party that is a loose coalition of naive, optimistic, unconventional, anti establishment individuals, often embued with and youthful and unrealistic student idealism.


By careful marketing and positioning he became, in a small way, "king maker" after the last election and, logically, decided to support the Conservative party - which historically the genuine Liberals [aka Orange group] that believe in personal freedom and small government are closer to. He is now experiencing the reality of political power, the need to compromise, negotiate and the shock of seeing the financial truth in the books. He has achieved some significant wins - not least the establishment of a much higher initial tax threshold of ?10,000 which will do more the low paid than welfare benefits.


He has been subject of unthinking and unfair vilification from the left of his party and Labour. If he and the coalition stay the course and active the balanced economy that remains their key priority he may yet gain the proper respect he deserves.


Not being a Lib Dem (I don't fit the demographic described in my opening paragraph) I won't be voting for him - but I respect him as an honest, if perhaps journeyman, politician. He's a far better man than the meretricious Ed Balls or Ed Milliband and other "deficit deniers".

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17255-clegg/#findComment-435744
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that Clegg sold out his party - it was more that getting into power exposed the contradictions and conflicting philosophies mired within it.


It didn't matter who the leader was, getting into power was always going to involve significant acts of betrayal to followers whose beliefs had never been tested.


Clegg achieved significant concessions, but has been let down by the fickleness of his supporters. The betrayal is theirs, not his.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17255-clegg/#findComment-435815
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you don't mind al fresco, there is a huge food market by the Royal Festival Hall: https://www.southbankcentre.co.uk/food-and-drink/southbank-centre-food-market/
    • Ahh, that's too bad. The SLP was always on sale in Sainsbury's and always available in libraries. They did some really detailed local crime reporting and local government reporting that other outlets wouldn't focus on.
    • Miranda Sawyer of the (once) Observer has done a piece on festival on Insta which might be of-interest.  Councils are private companies, imo. They make money for themselves, imo.  I do not think by law that they have to follow anything brought up by a consultation, this is for 'face' only - hence, LTNs and everything else.  
    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...