Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anybody seen the poor man in a wheelchair living at the harvester pup who has a mattress under the cover part opp the vets on lordship lane


since the change of weather he has now put up a tarpoling sheet to keep out the cold


surely he should be entitled to some form of housing more so that he is disabled with a wheel chair

Gaynor Hill Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi

> Is he in the grounds of the pub as I will see if I

> can do anything for him.

> Thanks

> Gaynor


He's in the sheltered bit on Lordship Lane by the Beer Garden.

Without knowing his story, there is no automatic right to housing for the homeless. And Southwark council have been busy selling off council homes and council property to corporate developers over replacing lost council homes.


I would try putting him in contact with one of the various homeless outreach programmes. Someone will then go and speak with him.

There are many people who are homeless but shun those who seek to help them. Many years ago through my work, I placed a medically unwell homeless man in a care home as it was winter and he was too weak to sleep out in the streets. I was working with a housing charity to find him more appropriate housing, when he left the care home and returned to the streets, preferring a life on the road. The charity had his details and kept an eye on him, but he refused all offers of accommodation.

Can homeless people who have problems drugs, alcohol etc are expected to somehow resolve there

issues in exchange for shelter. It is easy to see why

conditional housing does not often work for some people. Heres an interestin article of removing these conditions.


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-us-canada-36092852.


Editrd to say signing the lease and paying the rent is a problem in itself of course.

This article is about the US and Canada. It doesn't apply to the UK or to this gentleman.


In the UK homeless people have a right to housing if they have a priority need ie if they are old, sick or mentally ill. They don't have to promise to be a fit, well, sober or clean-living person. If this gentleman fulfills these criteria ie he is old, sick or mentally ill then Southwark should house him. Renata is looking in to this. If he fulfills these criteria and Southwark don't house him he should go to Citizens Advice.


But all this only works if he wants to be housed. As Pugwash said.

Hi All

I went to see the gentleman gave him a duvet I had he's a very polite man had chat he's ok just need a frying pan so going to get one for him

Coming out of the parking were vets are someone stop my hubby's car smashed into it everyone ok except hubby's car typical me trying to help and that happens never mind that's life I suppose

Gaynor

Sally I was aware it was Canada, the reality of being given a council house in London immediately without going through the homeless temporaryj housing, if you should be so lucky, is extremely unlikely.Many hostels, rehabs have condituons which include no alcohol.drugs etc. I put up the link as it shows not only looking at the issue of homelessness but action that recognises a bigger picture and what seems ti me a more understanding way.


Gaynor sorry to hear about your hubbys car and glad no one was hurt, who knows maybe your caring was paid back to you. All the best and hope your insurance sorts it out quick.

Yes Insurance will be ok but your right about homeless and help this man lost his legs through doing tour of duties

Some years ago I had a friend who was in a children's home she feared for her 16th birthday as you were thrown out then with no help my mother took her in but only room for her to sleep on sofa but did what we could sadly due to the abuse she suffered she committed suicide

I will never forget her fearing her 16th birthday being thrown out at least now they are not thrown out until they are 18 and get help

How sad Gaynor. Although I can understand why criterias may be needed, I feel it is usually charities or non govermental organisations who try to break that

systematic way of helping, which often cannot see the

complexity of peoples life, sticking to procedure may work fixing mechanics, but can be very disconnecting

on both sides when working with people.

Hi TE44,


No one will be given a council or housing association house without going through the homelessness system. That is the system. Council run hostels which are part of the homelessness system do not demand rehab, psychiatric treatment etc.


The system is hard, housing is in extremely short supply. Don't give people the idea that there are more obstacles than actually exist or those who could qualify will not apply.


Many homeless people do not like the over-night charitable hostels because they are full of mentally ill drunks. This gentleman does not sound mentally ill or drunk and that might be why he does not use them. He may not be vulnerable enough to qualify for council assistance or he may prefer a life under the stars.

Hi Sally i am confused by your post. The earlier link you posted says this man has already been through the system and struggled to keep conditions of stay. Are you saying if for whatever reason you are not given help after going through the system, you can go to a charitable hostel but it will be "full of drunks and mentally ill", where there is no conditions of stay. Are you also saying Southark Council does not use any organisations on referal outside of council run,

St Mungos handed a petion to goverment on the 10th October calling for a review to homeless policies. One, its policy to cap housing benefit for supported housing tenants at local housing rate. Here is a link.


https://www.mungos.org/get-involved/campaign-for-change/save-hostels-rebuild-lives/

Hi TE44,


I don't think I posted a link. I know nothing about this man personally so I am not commenting on his situation.


I am saying that homeless people who apply for council homelessness assistance are considered on their "priority need" which is their vulnerability. Their alcoholism or mental illness are factors which make them more likely to be deemed to have a priority need, not less likely.


People who are refused council assistance may be referred to charitable hostels and may not want or be able to go for various reasons -- one of which that they are not eligible for Housing Benefit or the often frightening conditions in these hostels (as people have described to me).


The council takes wrong decisions on vulnerability. If you know someone turned away by the council whom you think should have been assisted then send them to Citizens Advice. St Mungos is a great organisation which does wonderful work. Anything they say will be important and correct.

Sorry Sally pressed post by mistake. There is a huge crisis in social housing especially in London, this is

getting worse. Citizens advice is inundated with people

in fear of being evicted, many due to changes in benefits, universal credit being another policy adding to this.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> eddeal1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > not one person has said i have room in my house i

> > will take this human in.and try to help him.

>

> Have you made the offer?


He/She is far too busy selling their 2012 Alfa Romeo Mito 1.4 16v Sprint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
    • I look to the future and clearly see that the law of unintended consequences will apply with a vengeance and come 2029 Labour will voted out of office. As someone once said 'The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...