Jump to content

Recommended Posts

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi - what/where does Peckham Rye East mean ? is

> that just residents overlooking the park ? What

> roads are we talking, if you know ?

>

> Thanks




Peckham Rye (East) being just that. The only addresses posted to are the estates and the houses overlooking the common.

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Strange why such a limited consultation...is that

> normal ?


Probably to reduce the amount of opposition! What's 'normal' when SC are involved?


This is being toted as an improvement! But to what? Certainly not the common! Any erosion of London's green spaces (including Brockwell Park) for what in truth is a traffic and highways issue, should be opposed.

Peckham Rye East is the SE15 side.


I love this:

Peckham Rye is an area of London.

It's also a park and a common.

And two roads either side of that park and common are called Peckham Rye.

The East Dulwich (west) side is SE22

Peckham Rye East is the Nunhead side, SE15. I should charge a fee for the amount of lost cab drivers I've given directions to!


Stay with me.


Doncha love it.

Peckham Rye railway station used to be called Peckham but the station now called Queens Road was also called Peckham originally so they changed the one we know as Peckham Rye, to Peckham Rye.


I think way more people should have been asked their opinions on this cycle scheme.

All of those surrounding all of Peckham Rye Park and Common, for starters.



> > Hi - what/where does Peckham Rye East mean ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No photograph taken and no video evidence of anyone approaching or ringing my doorbell all morning. I have made a complaint to EVRI, but just in case anyone has taken in or found some James Wellbeloved Senior dry catfood on their doorstep ... I am at the South Circular/Horniman end of Underhill.
    • I may have missed it, but I don't think anyone has made that argument have they?  I don't know, but suspect they've figured the costs of cancelling at this late stage are greater than the costs of losing another legal challenge. I agree that if so, it's putting commercial considerations over legal process.
    • Honestly don't know what Lambeth are thinking - they should consider their reputation, loss of public trust, legal challenges and findings of maladministration. Perhaps they have and don't care. It stinks of commercial bias and contempt for the legal process and public.  
    • If the argument was 'all councils are bad' that would be clearly true, but as much of the debate has been about 'once a council is elected, what it does is right and mandated' I think there is greater merit in using this as a debating point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...