Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Legal commentary on "finders keepers" etc.


Personal anecdote -- about 30 years ago my handbag fell off my bag (not properly secured obviously). The person who found it handed it in to the police and I got it back. About 40 years ago as a very young person I left my purse on the bus with my week's wages in it (?11 :)) and the person who found it handed it in and I got it back.


I can feel very fond of the human race. They can be very caring and careful for others,


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8129534.stm

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is no note and someone takes it, it is technically Theft.

> Simples.

...

> You your child leaves their micro scooter outside your house and someone takes it , it is theft.

> No argument.


How do you reach those conclusions?

It is indeed theft by finding


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft_by_finding


http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/28/when-are-you-legally-allowed-to-keep-money-you-find-on-the-floor-6479579/


You're supposed to make an attempt to return to the owner (even if it's a five pound note). So if you take something abandoned in the street with the intention of handing it in to the police (or telling this forum) then it probably isn't theft as you want to make an effort to return it.

kibris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You left it in the street - your fault.If it was

> left inside the gate then you could say it was

> theft. But as you left it outside and more like

> your front door was closed then its not theft.


So if you go to the shops and leave a pram or your bike outside and some one takes it, it is not theft. ?


Don't be an ar*e. Of course it is theft.


DulwichFox

Not to side-track from this interesting thread, we had a box of fruit/veg "taken" from our front porch area Sunday morning. I would venture to say someone coming in through our gate and "taking" the box, which was outside our house, was indeed theft. Very disappointing. Sorry the cam was not yet installed to capture the culprit. I wonder if they made their get-away by micro scooter.

The link to the video doesn't work - is it still there?


Oh and even without seeing it, it clearly sounds like theft: Intention to permanently deprive

Kids leave their stuff outside their homes all the time...doesn't give anyone the right to take it without asking or without express permission.

It's theft.


People need to get off their high horses.


Just because we don't live in Frinkley Bottom, where people leave their doors open at night, doesn't mean we should always be on guard for thievery.


Question for those saying it isn't theft, would you have taken it?

If yes, you're as bad as the scooter thief and shoplifters!

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In all fairness, I agree with both Alice and

> Abdabs.

>

> Further, I'm a bit surprised by your implicit

> threat towards the woman who took it... not sure

> what you plan on doing with the high definition

> recording?

>

> There is a common theme of leaving things outside

> your house that you want collected and fair-doos

> to the woman.

>

> Insulting Alice has probably lost you any goodwill

> that might have come your way.



Shoplifter.

I think it's all in the positioning. I often leave things outside on my wall for people to take and they usually go within a very short time.


Of course I wouldn't have taken it, but they OP had said it was left outside and there is clearly some ambiguity in how this was positioned.


It's usually very clear if something is left for taking.


However, theft if rife and we should all look after our possessions.

Gloves Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's theft.

>

> People need to get off their high horses.

>

> Just because we don't live in Frinkley Bottom,

> where people leave their doors open at night,

> doesn't mean we should always be on guard for

> thievery.

>

> Question for those saying it isn't theft, would

> you have taken it?

> If yes, you're as bad as the scooter thief and

> shoplifters!


There is a 'thing' of people taking things left on the street - especially if near/in bins.


But using common sense you get a feeling for things that haven't been left to take and a court would have that feeling too (a scooter near the gateway of a house - my common sense says not to take unless to return).

People are being a bit mean to ED Moots. C'mon now, it's a kid's scooter, they're probably distraught. He/she didn't say it in a mean way - in fact, it just sounded informative, letting the lady know that it belonged to someone and wasn't a giveaway. And that they'd pick it up. Calm down, folks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...