Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I applied for a position in a retail family business in lordship lane this week, I could not upload my CV on the site they advertised did cover letter stating I have worked in Liberty and John Lewis W1 have excellent customer service and extensive knowledge of products they sell and could I email CV direct.

Had email back asking my age replied 53

Sadly due to a sudden death in family the next day I email saying what has happened and would not be around for the next 3/4 weeks but could I still send CV even if it's for future positions.

Had know reply back do you think it's because of my age or am I being sensitive?

Did not even get a reply saying sorry for your loss

What they did not know I have been a customer since the late 90's since they opened purchasing monthly products,

Never in my life experience this before.

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/
Share on other sites

They're definitely not supposed to ask your age, though realistically if they have a prejudice about that they'll give you another reason if you ask. On the other hand they might just be disorganised. Would it be worth dropping in and giving them a printed copy of your CV?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188494
Share on other sites

I'm 51 and worry about ageism too as no job lasts until retirement now (I'm in IT and it used to be said you're over the hill at 50 - but there are shortages now and older people are valued).


Mind you many companies just don't reply but it's strange they asked your age straight out - that would be a bit of a red flag to me (some bosses don't like people older than them to be working for them).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188499
Share on other sites

They shouldn't have asked your age. It would seem that it could be a reason they haven't replied. I think it could equally be because you are not available immediately.

I wouldn't say it's one over the other at all.


I would be inclined to pop in and see them, with a view to getting constructive feedback.


As Mark says - it demonstrates skills you would need any way and there's nothing wrong with stepping out of your comfort zone.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188520
Share on other sites

Fully understand what you are saying jools and boo but firstly when prospective employer wishes CV only I respect this also I emailed could I send CV for future employment if they had fulfilled the position.

Working in liberty and John Lewis as account manager you have to have excellent customer service and grooming you also get mystery shopper which I think is great

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188527
Share on other sites

Hi Nigello

To be honest not worth my time and I really would not report them I have not even named shop as I feel this would be unjust to them business is hard enough they have lost a loyal monthly customer and would I not want to work for someone who can not be bothered to email back after stating my age, when I had my business for 25 years I always rang prospective employers even if they did not get the position.just rude not to.

I was just in shock as this has never happened to me before and I stared work at 14 years old as a Saturday girl and have worked since decided to take a month out before putting CV out so this was only first one will start again in a month with all things going on

Thanks

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188543
Share on other sites

Yes it is illegal to ask your age.


I stopped putting anything which could indicate my age on my CV (although of course a long work record is significant if somebody wants to make guesses).


Many moons ago I used to train managers of various organisations in non discriminatory recruitment methods, and you would expect large companies to adhere to those (if for no other reason than potential bad publicity), however I suppose you can't expect a small shop to know (or possibly care) that they are breaking the law.


Though there may be exemptions for small businesses, I can't remember now.


Even apart from legal aspects, they should be looking at relevant skills and experience and matching those to the person spec. Many young people would be crap at the job. Many older people would be excellent.


The same applies to other non job related characteristics such as race and gender (except for a very few specific jobs where there may be reasons for wanting people from a particular group, which is legal).


What particularly used to bug me was companies specifiying that they wanted graduates (not sour grapes, I am one myself). In the vast majority of cases, having a degree per se bore no possible relevance to the job. Rather, the recruiter made particular assumptions about what qualities all graduates must have (eg quick to learn, maybe) without considering that many people without degrees might also have those qualities.


Anyway, I could go on. Oh, I did.


Gaynor I would like to know which this shop is.


I suppose one consolation might be, would you want to work somewhere where you felt that they thought you were too old for them? I wouldn't.


ETA: Very sorry for your loss, btw.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188550
Share on other sites

Hi Sue

Thank you for the lovely message, I feel it would be unjust to name and shame then business is hard enough and it was my problem feel that this subject should be out there saw today in paper a very qualified gentleman age 43 applied for 400 jobs with no success he ended up putting a plackared attached to him advertising himself he's now happy in a company.

Terrible

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188556
Share on other sites

I find it ridiculous that anyone would discriminate on the grounds of age. Two of the hardest working, most reliable members of staff I have are in their late forties and fifties respectively, and put people half their age to shame. I'm glad that they actually seem to enjoy working for us, because they demonstrate perfectly to never judge a book by its cover.


On the other hand the most unreliable have been those under the age of 25. Doesn't mean they can't become good staff, but they take a lot more training.


It's not true that age is just a number; it's more than that, it's an indicator of experience, patience and understanding, all of which is beyond valuable. I would go in and ask them why your application wasn't considered, people shouldn't be allowed to get away with it if they are doing that, and there's always the chance this is an honest mistake (of which I've been guilty of sometimes).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188621
Share on other sites

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I find it ridiculous that anyone would

> discriminate on the grounds of age. Two of the

> hardest working, most reliable members of staff I

> have are in their late forties and fifties

> respectively, and put people half their age to

> shame. I'm glad that they actually seem to enjoy

> working for us, because they demonstrate perfectly

> to never judge a book by its cover.

>

> On the other hand the most unreliable have been

> those under the age of 25. Doesn't mean they can't

> become good staff, but they take a lot more

> training.

>

> It's not true that age is just a number; it's more

> than that, it's an indicator of experience,

> patience and understanding, all of which is beyond

> valuable. I would go in and ask them why your

> application wasn't considered, people shouldn't be

> allowed to get away with it if they are doing

> that, and there's always the chance this is an

> honest mistake (of which I've been guilty of

> sometimes).


Thank you but after I emailed 53 and had no response the next day emailed stating I had a family death that evening so would not be around but would still like to send my CV for future opportunities if the position was filled by then and still no response. To me it's just common Curtis to reply even if it's to say sorry for your loss

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188623
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It isn't 'illegal' to ask someone's age, but it is

> irrelevant and enough to establish a prima facie

> case in any age discrimination claim.



That's weird, because I had to train a whole load of people when the legislation was brought in, both in my own company and their clients' companies.


http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1841

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188640
Share on other sites

I retired several years past my official retirement age and gave my employer 3 months notice. Right up to 3 weeks prior to my leaving date, my boss asked me to stay on due to my experience. Since retirement ages are rising more and more people will be working into their 70s.


When I worked in HR - had to number all the applications that came in and short list them on the grounds of meeting the selection criteria and were not allowed to consider age, sex or ethnicity. There were times when it was essential that a particular language was needed i.e. Cantonese, Mandarin, Urdu etc but this was clear in the criteria requirement.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188734
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My sister had no trouble getting office jobs in

> small businesses after she was 50- one of the

> interviewers actually told her that one of the

> reasons she got the job was because she was

> unlikely to go off and breed!


Also illegal!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188779
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Generally wild flowers which are indigenous to the UK are more likely to be supporting more wild life than introduced species, more commonly found in gardens, simply because wild life hasn't had time to adapt to it. Although of course many introductions which flower will be supporting pollinators more generally. (This would also be true of native as opposed to introduced tree and scrub species). And I suspect plants which are flowering over public space, even if rooted on private private, are being removed to stop them setting seed in public space. [Although many might see that as a good thing if the plants have merits of their own).
    • Good question. I think the benefit of some wild flowers is that they appear earlier in the spring and provide nectar for insects coming out of hibernation. Also, natives have evolved with the insects, some of which can only survive with certain native plants. For example, some species of  caterpillars need a specific native plant for their food. Having said that, I've seen lots of pollinators having a field day on some non native flowers. My bees love my verbena bonariensis for example.
    • Genuine question- are wild flowers/weeds better for wildlife than cultivated flowers? My cultivated flowers and their seeds attract birds, bees and all kinds of insects, maybe more so than wild flowers.
    • Sue. It's a long journey trying to change the long established mindset that many of us grew up with, namely cultivated flowers are good and wild flowers anywhere other than in the wild are bad. My job as a child was to go round pulling up all the dandelions that dared to invade my Dad's pride and joy of a garden. I still battle with my Mum, trying in vain to convince her of the benefits of so called weeds in her garden. Her neighbours, all of a certain age, are the same. Anyone who doesn't attack any weed with gusto is the subject of Mum's disapproving neighbours. We can only keep trying to convince others of the benefits of these much maligned flowers.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...