Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I applied for a position in a retail family business in lordship lane this week, I could not upload my CV on the site they advertised did cover letter stating I have worked in Liberty and John Lewis W1 have excellent customer service and extensive knowledge of products they sell and could I email CV direct.

Had email back asking my age replied 53

Sadly due to a sudden death in family the next day I email saying what has happened and would not be around for the next 3/4 weeks but could I still send CV even if it's for future positions.

Had know reply back do you think it's because of my age or am I being sensitive?

Did not even get a reply saying sorry for your loss

What they did not know I have been a customer since the late 90's since they opened purchasing monthly products,

Never in my life experience this before.

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/
Share on other sites

They're definitely not supposed to ask your age, though realistically if they have a prejudice about that they'll give you another reason if you ask. On the other hand they might just be disorganised. Would it be worth dropping in and giving them a printed copy of your CV?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188494
Share on other sites

I'm 51 and worry about ageism too as no job lasts until retirement now (I'm in IT and it used to be said you're over the hill at 50 - but there are shortages now and older people are valued).


Mind you many companies just don't reply but it's strange they asked your age straight out - that would be a bit of a red flag to me (some bosses don't like people older than them to be working for them).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188499
Share on other sites

They shouldn't have asked your age. It would seem that it could be a reason they haven't replied. I think it could equally be because you are not available immediately.

I wouldn't say it's one over the other at all.


I would be inclined to pop in and see them, with a view to getting constructive feedback.


As Mark says - it demonstrates skills you would need any way and there's nothing wrong with stepping out of your comfort zone.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188520
Share on other sites

Fully understand what you are saying jools and boo but firstly when prospective employer wishes CV only I respect this also I emailed could I send CV for future employment if they had fulfilled the position.

Working in liberty and John Lewis as account manager you have to have excellent customer service and grooming you also get mystery shopper which I think is great

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188527
Share on other sites

Hi Nigello

To be honest not worth my time and I really would not report them I have not even named shop as I feel this would be unjust to them business is hard enough they have lost a loyal monthly customer and would I not want to work for someone who can not be bothered to email back after stating my age, when I had my business for 25 years I always rang prospective employers even if they did not get the position.just rude not to.

I was just in shock as this has never happened to me before and I stared work at 14 years old as a Saturday girl and have worked since decided to take a month out before putting CV out so this was only first one will start again in a month with all things going on

Thanks

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188543
Share on other sites

Yes it is illegal to ask your age.


I stopped putting anything which could indicate my age on my CV (although of course a long work record is significant if somebody wants to make guesses).


Many moons ago I used to train managers of various organisations in non discriminatory recruitment methods, and you would expect large companies to adhere to those (if for no other reason than potential bad publicity), however I suppose you can't expect a small shop to know (or possibly care) that they are breaking the law.


Though there may be exemptions for small businesses, I can't remember now.


Even apart from legal aspects, they should be looking at relevant skills and experience and matching those to the person spec. Many young people would be crap at the job. Many older people would be excellent.


The same applies to other non job related characteristics such as race and gender (except for a very few specific jobs where there may be reasons for wanting people from a particular group, which is legal).


What particularly used to bug me was companies specifiying that they wanted graduates (not sour grapes, I am one myself). In the vast majority of cases, having a degree per se bore no possible relevance to the job. Rather, the recruiter made particular assumptions about what qualities all graduates must have (eg quick to learn, maybe) without considering that many people without degrees might also have those qualities.


Anyway, I could go on. Oh, I did.


Gaynor I would like to know which this shop is.


I suppose one consolation might be, would you want to work somewhere where you felt that they thought you were too old for them? I wouldn't.


ETA: Very sorry for your loss, btw.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188550
Share on other sites

Hi Sue

Thank you for the lovely message, I feel it would be unjust to name and shame then business is hard enough and it was my problem feel that this subject should be out there saw today in paper a very qualified gentleman age 43 applied for 400 jobs with no success he ended up putting a plackared attached to him advertising himself he's now happy in a company.

Terrible

Gaynor

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188556
Share on other sites

I find it ridiculous that anyone would discriminate on the grounds of age. Two of the hardest working, most reliable members of staff I have are in their late forties and fifties respectively, and put people half their age to shame. I'm glad that they actually seem to enjoy working for us, because they demonstrate perfectly to never judge a book by its cover.


On the other hand the most unreliable have been those under the age of 25. Doesn't mean they can't become good staff, but they take a lot more training.


It's not true that age is just a number; it's more than that, it's an indicator of experience, patience and understanding, all of which is beyond valuable. I would go in and ask them why your application wasn't considered, people shouldn't be allowed to get away with it if they are doing that, and there's always the chance this is an honest mistake (of which I've been guilty of sometimes).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188621
Share on other sites

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I find it ridiculous that anyone would

> discriminate on the grounds of age. Two of the

> hardest working, most reliable members of staff I

> have are in their late forties and fifties

> respectively, and put people half their age to

> shame. I'm glad that they actually seem to enjoy

> working for us, because they demonstrate perfectly

> to never judge a book by its cover.

>

> On the other hand the most unreliable have been

> those under the age of 25. Doesn't mean they can't

> become good staff, but they take a lot more

> training.

>

> It's not true that age is just a number; it's more

> than that, it's an indicator of experience,

> patience and understanding, all of which is beyond

> valuable. I would go in and ask them why your

> application wasn't considered, people shouldn't be

> allowed to get away with it if they are doing

> that, and there's always the chance this is an

> honest mistake (of which I've been guilty of

> sometimes).


Thank you but after I emailed 53 and had no response the next day emailed stating I had a family death that evening so would not be around but would still like to send my CV for future opportunities if the position was filled by then and still no response. To me it's just common Curtis to reply even if it's to say sorry for your loss

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188623
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It isn't 'illegal' to ask someone's age, but it is

> irrelevant and enough to establish a prima facie

> case in any age discrimination claim.



That's weird, because I had to train a whole load of people when the legislation was brought in, both in my own company and their clients' companies.


http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1841

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188640
Share on other sites

I retired several years past my official retirement age and gave my employer 3 months notice. Right up to 3 weeks prior to my leaving date, my boss asked me to stay on due to my experience. Since retirement ages are rising more and more people will be working into their 70s.


When I worked in HR - had to number all the applications that came in and short list them on the grounds of meeting the selection criteria and were not allowed to consider age, sex or ethnicity. There were times when it was essential that a particular language was needed i.e. Cantonese, Mandarin, Urdu etc but this was clear in the criteria requirement.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188734
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My sister had no trouble getting office jobs in

> small businesses after she was 50- one of the

> interviewers actually told her that one of the

> reasons she got the job was because she was

> unlikely to go off and breed!


Also illegal!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/171815-ageism/#findComment-1188779
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Errr could it be because of the noise pollution coming from it perhaps? You may not be able to hear it where you live but anyone on the Dulwich Village side of Lordship Lane all the way to beyond Brockwell Park is being disturbed by it - the sound wash from it is huge and that's a lot of people. As I said before we know people who live nearer to Brockwell Park to us and they say it is unbearable.   To be fair the Emirates moved to a piece of wasteland between railway tracks so it actually in a less densely populated area now and the council actually goes out of their way to try to mitigate the impact on local residents and yes, other than the concerts, you could hear a pin drop on matchdays! 😉 
    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...