Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Right - it is now time to start shifting the left over baby weight. I work out my bottom half twice a day on the school run, but its the mummy tummy and upper body that needs attention.


I know some of you have been using High vibes (with good results?) but I recently saw a salon in Sydenham that offers Flabelos treatments, for ?4 a session, ?10 for a week or ?30 unlimited use for a month. Reading on the internet, these machines also have rave reviews.


Has anyone locally used Flabelos, at the place in Sydenham? Or is there a closer option? And crucially, does it work?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17171-high-vibe-vs-flabelos/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • it would seem very likely that they are trying it on if it their area - ie not a responsibility of the freehold. The freehold would cover the building structure (walls, foundation, roof) - possibly freeholder would have responsibility for the front door - if so, does the freeholder have the windows? Usually grey area in a lease so you could look at past instances - who has paid for window replacement, front door to be painted etc?  
    • Thanks for these comments. Very helpful. The porch and hallway shows on their lease plan but we share the freehold together. 
    • Ok.  You have bigger problems than this s20 notice.  How have you let one freeholder dominate things.  You both have the equal right to decide how to manage the communal areas of the property.  I would get some legal advice on your duties and rights as a freeholder and then request a meeting  to reset the relationship. Also as noted in other posts is the front yard and door actually the responsibility of the freeholder.  These are all questions you should ask in your S20 response.
    • seems perfectly sensible to restrict cert 18 but would have thought cert 15 are acceptable. we don't know what the complaint was or if the measures taken by the cinema address it or go too far. if there was a scenario when an infant was in a regular screening, then I would completely understand the complaint. if the complaint was from someone who attended a parent screening, then - well, I guess it depends what was on! if the complaint was from someone who has not involvement or experience then the cinema surely wouldn't have taken measures based  on it  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...