Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our kitchen ceiling has some fairly scarey cracks across it. I've had 3 quotes but for different things - one would cut the cracks out and refill them (we had that done before to the original big crack, it has reopened though took a couple of years to do so,) one would reboard the whole ceiling and the other replace just part of the ceiling. My husband isn't keen on reboarding as the ceiling in that room is already lower than in the other rooms and although the reboarding only lowers it an inch, he's tall and feels it will make it feel cramped. All 3 builders warned of how disruptive taking down a whole ceiling is: what have been your experience? can you get away with just covering things or do you need to remove the cooker and fridge? is it possible to prevent dust getting into the rest of the house, and if so, how?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17167-advice-wanted-re-ceiling-work/
Share on other sites

I had a ceiling taken down and reboarded, and it is normally a very messy mob, with a large amount of dust going into the air. I'd advocate clearing the room as much as you can, perhaps sealing any objects you don't want to move in a couple of layers of thick polythene, gaffer taped. Hanging dust sheets etc over the doors to try to minimise the dirt getting elsewhere, but you'll have to face it, it's going to get messy as the builders will be pulling the ceiling down and keeping your house clean won't always be their first priority. so you can expect to get a thin layer of dust throughout the same floor, and to consider the room it's happening in as a bit of a bomb site. (Unless you're in a new build, in which case you won't have 100 years plus dust and god knows what else waiting for you on top of your ceiling!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...