Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Here is the response, which although not what I wanted (doesn't she and others at the GLA have the wherewithal to have asked this question already?) was at least fast.


I don?t have an answer to that off the top of my head ? I know that some borough officers do enforce.


We will table a question to the Mayor to try to find out more


Caroline


I will give it a fortnight and pursue.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here is the response, which although not what I

> wanted (doesn't she and others at the GLA have the

> wherewithal to have asked this question already?)

> was at least fast.

>

> I don?t have an answer to that off the top of my

> head ? I know that some borough officers do

> enforce.

>

> We will table a question to the Mayor to try to

> find out more

>

> Caroline

>

> I will give it a fortnight and pursue.




That's promising, and as you say a fast response at least.


Let's hope it produces results!

The thinking behind this charge is to discourage those with older cars from driving in central London? Alternatively you could argue that the mayor is saying as long as you pay the charge you can drive your old, polluting gas guzzling crate to your hearts content

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I had my car ransacked on Wednesday night, I assumed I’d left it unlocked. It was unlocked again this morning though and I definitely locked it last night.   The car was outside my front door and the keys near the door inside so I assume this is a relay theft  issue with someone using a remote key reader. I would advise keeping keys away from the front door. I have reported to police. 
    • They plan to close the Mount Pleasant Office, absolute and utter madnesss
    • We are sadly saddled with the three stooges till July 2029 because they have such a far reaching majority, that is the problem when you give a party that level of support.  The ship was being turned around by the last Administration and given all their faults, errors, misdemeanours its not surprising that that got and probably deservedly so out of Office.  But if what has just happened over the past 100+ days since the new Administration took power, we are in for a very bumpy ride and peoples lives will ALL be affected. They say they champion the poor, well all they've done so far by taking away the winter fuel allowance (not eligible for it) and increasing employers national insurance, as sure as eggs is eggs, prices will increase and that hits everyone in the pocket, including the poorest in society. You can only shake the money tree so often, after which time it's Empty. What that means is the cost of providing benefits increases, where does the money then come from.  To then take on the farmers who feed part of the economy is utter madness, because if they blockade food supplies then people will go hungry, not necessarily starve. You don't shoot the hand that feeds you.  Their is enough written about the three stooges, Starmer, Reeves and Rayner, I have no idea if they are supposed "communists", but what I have seen is that free speech is being eroded, that can never be good for a democracy, where people are scared to speak out.  How does all this change, the people will eventually have had enough and rise up against the Govt. It has to happen eventually. Even is Starmer went you are left with Reeves and Rayner. Personally O don't trust either, it will be more of "do as I say, not as I do".  
    • Thanks for the invite, although most people will be at work or at school. It's a Monday morning...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...