Jump to content

Recommended Posts

there is an argument that tap water contains chemicals and should be filtered. You can google this all yourself and find out the opinions of the researchers.


Depends how worried you are. I don't think it's ever killed anyone. I suppose if you were that worried, you wouldn't choose to live in London with all the air pollution.


My mum and sister filter their water and always have done. I don't. ...but then I eat sugar and smoke (but I don't drink alcohol or eat processed food).

I have had Chronic Kidney Disease with low kidney function all my life and I now have my freedom pass! Lived in London all of that time and here in ED for more than 30 of it. I have to drink a minumum of 3 litres a day, mainly tap water, never caused problems and none of my kidney medical team have ever mentioned it could cause problems.
I think that arises from a misconception: because kidney stones are mainly calcium and hard water contains more calcium, people assume there would be a link but large scale studies show it doesn't exist. Even if there were a small risk the benefits of water would far outweigh it, every 500ml of water drunk per day reduces the risk of kidney stones by around 7%, apparently (source, my GP who told me off for not drinking enough water on long cycle rides!).
I have lived all my life in hard water areas. I'm fine (so far) - and it's been close to 70 years. Some people find that if they move to a different area they can get a stomach upset by a change of mineral content in water (I've heard that of Moscow water) - but that's a short term effect. London water actually hasn't been through seven people before it gets to you (that's a myth) and it is most unlikely to precipitate illness in anyone. It does however cause water staining on surfaces and can gunge up kettles (and central heating pipes). There are perfectly good reasons to soften hard water, but very rarely health related.

When I was at university (studying genetics and microbiology) we had to do a final year project/dissertation. One of my fellow students studied the microbial content of bottled waters.


They found coliform bacteria (an indicator of contamination) in a number of brands of still water. The acceptable level for tap water is zero as their presence indicates a contamination within the water supply which, of course, could have huge public health implications.


No carbonated bottled water had any viable coliforms. This would always be the case as the carbon-dioxide lowers the pH to a level of acidity where pathogenic bacteria will not survive. Not sure how good it is for the enamel on your teeth though.


I drink tap water - and sometimes filtered tap water because it improves the taste of my tea. The filtration would not remove any bacteria if there were any present anyway. Sometimes I drink carbonated water when I?m out if it has a particular flavour - the alka-seltzer taste of Badoit for eg.


It?s possible that standards have improved in the still-water bottling industry (the project was almost 30 years ago) but I don?t see the point of drinking it at home and I haven?t looked them up.

We have a separate small cold water tap on the sink that passes through a filter. It runs a lot slower than the main tap, so you need both. The filters cost about 30 quid and last about a year (they say six months, though). Pays for itself in no time if you've been buying bottled water.


The kettle fuzzes up a lot less, as well.

I use a filter jug, partly for the tea and partly for the sake of the kettle.


I too have family in Suffolk and find the water there grates a bit, so here it must be softer, though when I lived in a proper soft-water area in Cumbria it took some getting used to, particularly washing your face and hair as there was never that squeaky-clean feeling, which to me felt like the soap hadn't rinsed off. Birmingham has lovely water, comes off the Welsh hills apparently. Comes out a bit brown sometimes though.

I really DNK why bottle water is so popular. Granted, it is nice to have a bit of fizzy stuff every now and again, but British tap water is amongst the best. All that pollution from transporting bottles of water when you can get it out of a tap seems ludicrous. Another sign of the mad(wo)men holding too much sway.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I use a filter jug, partly for the tea and partly

> for the sake of the kettle.

>

> I too have family in Suffolk and find the water

> there grates a bit, so here it must be softer,

> though when I lived in a proper soft-water area in

> Cumbria it took some getting used to, particularly

> washing your face and hair as there was never that

> squeaky-clean feeling, which to me felt like the

> soap hadn't rinsed off. Birmingham has lovely

> water, comes off the Welsh hills apparently. Comes

> out a bit brown sometimes though.


They submerged a Welsh village to get that water :)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elan_Valley_Reservoirs

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and then there's the environmental cost of bottled

> water, which is far too low on people's priorities


Definitely - until quite recently I was guzzling a couple of litres of Sainsbury's Highland Spring fizzy water every day, then Mrs.H pointed out that for someone who tries to be environmentally sound a couple of large plastic bottles a day wasn't that good a thing. Back to the tap for me!


I spent part of my childhood in Brussels, the local alimentation had a scheme whereby one took back wine bottles and they were refilled from the barrel. I'm convinced supermarkets could do this with all sorts of products and that it would be really popular.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...