Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At every opportunity Hughnot throws in the race card,or the religous one ,he was pointed out to me in a pub actually

by someone from this forum.

In his., forties,No;one haircut,jeans and sports jacket and jeans,glasses and asian looking.

Seemed a pleasant enough person at the time.

I cant understand why people come here to live,when they despise Englishmen so much.

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At every opportunity Hughnot throws in the race

> card,or the religous one ,he was pointed out to me

> in a pub actually

> by someone from this forum.

> In his., forties,No;one haircut,jeans and sports

> jacket and jeans,glasses and asian looking.

> Seemed a pleasant enough person at the time.

> I cant understand why people come here to

> live,when they despise Englishmen so much.


This is splendid. Not only an Indian, but an Immigrant, and an Anglophobic one to boot!

The notion that all immigrants are leeches is ridiculous. My other half and many of his friends are immigrants - all work very hard, pay their taxes, live in privately rented homes, and when they need medical or dental treatment tend to go private, even though their incomes are modest (most are in the building trade or working in restaurants). When one of them is short of work (some are self employed) they tend to look after each other financially - not claiming dole. They came here not to scrounge off the state but simply because employment prospects were greater here than where they are from.


I also work with plenty of immigrants - there aren't enough actuaries in the UK to meet demand (too many mathematicians tempted into the banking industry for the higher pay). They wouldn't be here if the UK market provided enough staff to meet the demand. And trust me, you won't find my colleagues from overseas are here to get a council house to live in. They are here because the UK offers the best chance to develop their skills. Many intend to return back home long term, and will have paid plenty of tax in the meantime whilst not imposing much cost on the state during their time here.


Neither groups would be here if there were enough people in the UK willing and able to do these jobs.

Yes does right but remember many immigrants come from different back grounds

and some of them don't come here just to do the odd jobs but they are here for family business

The family I know build and sale properties in their country for more than 20 years

and most of this properties are sold to their comunity in Latin America, United States, Canada, England,

Madrid etc and they have their own agents on each country so 2 of the members of the family who lives abroad is in charge of all the other agents from other countries.

Most of their family business are connected with their comunity living abroad

so there is a lot of other reasons why they are here. Hope this Forum have help people

to see things on a different prospect and probably not not discriminate some people.

As we know for some is easy to say than done but lets try for future generations as all

of us live in a very cosmopolitan countries and we can't avoid from each other not even

our children would be able to do it.

so its it ok on this forum to use racist inflammmatory language used by tarot????? he really is stuck in the 70's (who uses the 'h' and 'g' word these days? where are the moderators, and who can guess what tarot will come out with next.... the words politically and correct stand to mind....soooo predictable. whatever he/she says, i've no doubt it will resemble the contents of my stomach, and smell like my waste products...yes tarot, people of colour eat and deposit in the same way that you do, but don't regurgitate it when trying to express an opinion.

Tarot, you have steangely managed to win me over with some of your previous threads, not because I agree with anything you say, quite the opposite. You do skillfully manage to sharpen each word to cause just enough reaction to keep a nuclear plant going..


It makes for interesting reading if nothing else.

How can a thread about goverment future plans to callously throw people out of their homes because they need places for the influx of migrants turn into a race thread,let alone about black people.

Their is more than one race coming here to live.

There are people on the forum going on about slavery and white guilt. I for one do not feel guilty about something

other people done over four hundred years ago,and further.Get real.

There are agitators like Hughnot, who thinks the world owes him something so he jumps on the bandwagon and fans the

flames.

Live in the present your howling at seventeenth century ghost.

They are not turning people out of their homes for migrants...you are completely away with the fairies now Tarot. They are looking at making existing tenants downsize so that those families in homes too small for them can be housed. I know of five families in council accomodation that is woefully too small while single people are occupying 3 and four bedroom flats. There is common sense in the council, who after all OWN the properties, swapping those tenants.


It has nothing to do with migrants (the majority of which are not eligible for social housing) at all.

Asylum seekers get social housing.

It does make sense to downsize,and many old and infirm people are accepting that, but their plans are blackmail

forcing them to move by cutting their rent allowance.

There is a very large pensioner population,widowers, widows,singles.

Where are they going to get single homes for them , when they oust them from their homes, should they all be stuck in homes and drugged ,in a chair all day.

Immigration must be curbed, we are full up, its common sense.

Every year you hear on the news,a lorry in India has toppled over a cliff. why because its over crowded.

Whats hard to understand about overcrowding.

Dont know about these faries though,where they come from.

Asylum seekers do not get social housing...they get temporary accomodation (usually in hostels). Something entirely different.


The only people that are being forced to downsize are those that don't want to move. Again you are foccussing on pensioners when most persioners who are moved, are moved into accomodation suitable for them, like bungalows etc. No pensioner is ever moved to somewhere unsuitable.


The people who will be most affected by this are younger, succeeded tenants with no dependants living in three and four bedroom properties, who should have been forced to downsize in the six month window the law allows authorities to use, but failed to do so.


So please stop with your nonsense Tarot. This is an area I know a lot about and pretty much everything you've posted so far has been untrue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...