Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know there has been plenty of discussion about the methadone clinic that the DMC is proposing, but I just want to say, I for one think the DMC is a pretty good thing to have. I was there the other day and had flashbacks to my old GP, a dingy 30's semi with shag carpeting and fittings from god knows when. It always looked as if you'd actually catch something there rather than be cured of any illness. Surely, they should be at least given credit for having a clean, modern efficient facility?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1703-dulwich-medical-centre/
Share on other sites

Sounds rubbish to me, I used to go to Dr Thom in Court Lane who smoked and drank whisky when he saw you. His main advice being to abstain from both. You didn't go back. Er, you don't have anything to do with the running of the place? Shag carpeting sounds good, can you get that on the NHS?
  • 4 weeks later...

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeChuff Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > there are some seriously fit doctors working

> there

>

>

> yes, that's exactly what I look for in a doctor :X


Settle down, bloody hell... Unless of course you're JoeChuff's missus, in which case go get him tiger.

I love the Desk Staff, I used to think they were grumpy, but aren't we all on a bad day. Lately I've had a bit of a laugh with them.


It must be a bit annoying for them having to constantly tell people they can't have an appointment. I know it's annoying when you can't get an appointment, but to be fair, it's really nothing to do with the receptionists, they're just the ones who have to deal with the backlash.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The driver was male he was on a mobile No one was hurt l. Complete dick
    • Surely the question is whether James Mcash is effective in his various roles? I've seen nothing to suggest otherwise as a GG councillor or cabinet member. No idea about the teaching but he's made a career of it, so one would think he's perfectly fine on that front too. What I do object to is him being elected under one banner and hopping under another one, I suspect out of naked self interest. His headline rationale for the move is scarcely credible. He claims "the council was “planning for funding gaps larger than those faced in almost every year of Conservative and Liberal Democrat austerity, this time imposed by a Labour government...Unless something changes, Labour cuts will devastate the local services that as residents of this fantastic borough, we all rely on.” But what he's actually talking about here is the new Fair Funding Review, undertaken by notorious Tories Angela Rayner and Jim McMahon.   https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-fair-funding-review-20/the-fair-funding-review-20 The Fair Funding Review is explicitly about the redistribution of resources based on updated needs assessment, which, last time I looked was a key tenet of the left (including the Greens). Mcash also claims Southwark "cannot and does not stand up the the government" but that simply isn't the case as Southwark, Lambeth and London Councils have objected to the FFR because it fails to take into account Londoners' high housing costs. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/2025/southwark-and-lambeth-leaders-call-fair-funding  He seems high on bluster and low on actual detail. And the great problem Greens have to overcome, like everyone else, is that the country has no money.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...