Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know there has been plenty of discussion about the methadone clinic that the DMC is proposing, but I just want to say, I for one think the DMC is a pretty good thing to have. I was there the other day and had flashbacks to my old GP, a dingy 30's semi with shag carpeting and fittings from god knows when. It always looked as if you'd actually catch something there rather than be cured of any illness. Surely, they should be at least given credit for having a clean, modern efficient facility?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1703-dulwich-medical-centre/
Share on other sites

Sounds rubbish to me, I used to go to Dr Thom in Court Lane who smoked and drank whisky when he saw you. His main advice being to abstain from both. You didn't go back. Er, you don't have anything to do with the running of the place? Shag carpeting sounds good, can you get that on the NHS?
  • 4 weeks later...

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeChuff Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > there are some seriously fit doctors working

> there

>

>

> yes, that's exactly what I look for in a doctor :X


Settle down, bloody hell... Unless of course you're JoeChuff's missus, in which case go get him tiger.

I love the Desk Staff, I used to think they were grumpy, but aren't we all on a bad day. Lately I've had a bit of a laugh with them.


It must be a bit annoying for them having to constantly tell people they can't have an appointment. I know it's annoying when you can't get an appointment, but to be fair, it's really nothing to do with the receptionists, they're just the ones who have to deal with the backlash.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Houses subject to these taxes aren't the average house though either.    They are ordinary houses that just happen to be marginally more expensive than the ones the Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer each rent out. 
    • ??? Average London house prices in 1970 (from land registry) = £5190, £72,000 in today's money. London houses were getting on for 5 times the national average wage in 1970, if we used that as a formula that would be around £200k for an average London house today.    
    • The average house in London was nothing like £68k in the sixties.  I suspect our fictional hard done by ED pensioner probably paid something more like £6k.  Also your interest calculations are  abit dodgy.  Our pensioner did not buy the house for £2m so would not be paying anything like that interest.    As for more recent buyers, I doubt many purchasers of £2m houses are doing so with a 95% mortgage. @Ebenezer I agree with CGT on primary residences. There are a few ways to cut this bit the fact remains housing wealth has been  massively undertaxed and it is a growing source of intergenerational inequality.
    • Cost of Covid to government estimated at £400 billion Cost to the economy of leaving Europe estimated at  £32 billion a year  Cost  to UK due to Russia invading Ukraine £100 Billion plus Some analyses suggest that by 2018/19, austerity had suppressed the economy by nearly £100 billion, equivalent to over £3,600 per household, and led to a 2% reduction in GDP by 2015. The long-term effects include a weaker economy, lower wages, and a failure to reduce the fiscal deficit as effectively as intended, partly because lower growth reduced tax revenues You can do the maths yourself
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...