Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found, last night, a carefully prepared note (in a plastic folder) on the windscreen of my (off street parked) car, offering to buy it and suggesting that ?the law? about uninsured cars had recently changed. The note implied that my car was uninsured. I knew that it wasn?t, and checked this morning on the government site to ensure that this wasn?t carrying false information (it wasn?t). I?m not sure I understand whether this is a scam, or if it is, what sort of scam it is, but is suspect it?s an attempt to scare people into parting with their cars at (what I would guess would be) well below market rates. Just a heads up in case anyone else receives such a note, or can shed any light on what this may be about. The ?illustrations? on the note showed low loaders taking away cars ? perhaps to suggest official seizure?


I don't think there is sufficient here to alert authorities, after all the note doesn't exactly say my car is uninsured, just suggests it through inference, and there is a contact number and name given which could presumably be traced, but I believe it's sufficiently strange to share on the forum.

Might be worth a phone call or email to Trading Standards -- just to alert them. Presumably the leaflet has a mobile phone no or some way to contact them.


Cars parked off the road don't need to be insured as I understand it. Do you use your car or does it mostly rest there? There used to be a house near us with a charming old car on the driveway which never moved and I took it that it was not insured and therefore had to be off the road (I didn't offer to buy it)

Sally Eva - (1) I didn't check other cars - as mine was off road I didn't much want to go into others' properties to nose round their cars - certainly no street parked cars seemed to have such a notice (2) The car is used several times a week, but was parked up last week as I was away on holiday. Thanks about the Trading Standards suggestion.


Amended to add - nobody is answering any phone - Southwark Trading Standards off loads their problems to Citizens Advice (in Leeds!) - 101 plays telephone tag and then says it has no operators available. An issue such as this is left hanging in the wind. And, of course, it may not even be an issue, just a suspicion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Those 5 bedrooms are all tiny though. Even the largest of the master bedrooms in these old jerry built houses are often no larger than 15 square metres. For context the minimum size for a two man prison cell is 8.5 square metres.  It's hardly palatial luxury being offered round here. And after you've paid £155,000 in tax to buy the house, and another £3000 a year to the council to empty your bins twice a month, this greedy government is coming after you now taxing you what amounts to another 12.5% of the value of your home every ten years. 
    • There is nothing in the budget to promote growth, which is what we desperately need. The wealthiest pay more already, with the higher rate tax. I’m sure they can afford £7.5k but we need to encourage successful people and business to invest and stay in the country. 
    • I went to a girls' public day  school in the fifties and sixties. The first school rule was "courtesy and consideration to others are expected at all times".  There was quite a high number of Jewish girls, both in the junior and senior school. I don't recall a single incident of anti-Semitism. Is this something confined to boys' schools, or was my school unusual?
    • The biggest problem in the UK is that we don't know if we want to be a European social democracy or the US when it comes to tax - and we are left with the worst parts of both. The US has a strong growth economy and incentives that has lead to high standards of living for the middle classes. Europe has high tax, but distributed fairly across different earners, and has lead to good public services and satisfaction for all. In the UK, we have an ultra-progressive tax with disproportionate burdens on high earners. But we have poor public services because that tax burden is not spread more fairly and is therefore limited. Meanwhile, high earners feel disincentivised to work and will suppress earnings to avoid tax traps.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...