Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is my first input on this thread. Why do people think it is so unreasonable for people to want to be in an area without kids?


I hope to be a parent in the not too distant future, and when that day comes I'm sure I will be loking for a place where I can take mini Keef and have a pint. However, I will also be hoping that there are places I can get away from the sound of kids on the odd occasion I get a break.


I do think no children areas is an idea which just wouldn't work. However, I can't stand the view that someone who wants to keep a few child free places for grown ups to have a beer in peace, is a child hating git.

This is such a ridiculously over repeated and unneccessarily fractious thread topic.


In short it's like telly. If you don't like reality tv, don't watch it when it's on. If you're strangely in the mood for repeats of Dempsey and Makepeace then slap on a bit of uk gold for half an hour.


We all know what places and what times are prone to lots of bugaboos, and which ones aren't. Something for everyone in this fair townlet and environs of ours.

mightyroar Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah Ganapati, the quiet voice of reason. as ever. I

> agree with you entirely.

>

> But Clairese22, Dom- perhaps we need a national

> curfew? After the breeding licence has been

> approved, and the children are born, then they

> are micro chipped at birth, and if caught out in a

> public space after 8pm then their parents are

> publicly whipped?


Reasonable and moderate policies in my view and already on the Manifesto of my newly-formed King Herod Childcare Foundation (motto: Infanticide - A Cure For The World's Ills) .............JUST JOKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • An interesting point.  In my work I met lots of different people in different circumstances; individuals finding themselves through no fault of their own, living in such houses having inherited them, but not themselves having the means to pay to keep them so they  moved away, or they simply didn't want to move from the place of their family life through generations.  Some of us may think a nice problem to have, but emotionally very difficult a situation to be in.  I agree that income tax always seems to be a fairer way.  My bugbear is and always be taxing private pensions, when one has already paid tax on the earnings that make them up!  The entire amount makes up the tax and not just taxed on the interest made since.    
    • Im pretty sure he specialises in treating children. 
    • Does anyone remember that Christmas tree fair in the middle of Goose Green year?
    • What do we think? There's a couple of not very big ordinary family homes for sale on my street that will fall foul of this.  Seems totally arbitrary to tax these people more than others imo. J hope the treasury will pay the cost of collection too, rather than burdening the council who won't benefit at all from this tax. They should have just increased income tax.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...