Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The damage that cretinous parents do because they think they're so clever.


DPF I'm merely pointing out that people arguing this poster was okay based on a technicality (which is what you're messing around with here also) are completely missing the point.


We're not in some poncey sixth form debate. This is the real world and real people who get abused and attacked by people over a long period of time.


Ofsted have made it clear that this was a good Head doing a good job. Many posters on here have described their enthusiasm and support for her.


Other posters have demonstrated a complete lack of support, have persisted with rather snotty arguments that this poster is not offensive based on rather pathetic technicalities.


Mainly it's clear that what you've got is what goes on persistently in education. It's simply bullying. Bully from a nasty vindictive clique of parents who are exploiting this situation for their own goals, whatever they may be.


There is a process for addressing underperforming Heads, and it doesn't include malicious posters and daubing B**** C*** on the side of school buildings.

Think about it: one in ten Heads have been assaulted by parents on school grounds.


One in ten.


One in ten assaulted for doing their job which is essentially caring for and developing children.


One in ten.


Then think about the possible effects of posters showing lynch mobs. Then think about the teachers kids who get assaulted because their parents are teachers. Imagine the terrible fears that teachers go through thinking that their kids are going to be assaulted because of their choice in job.


Then think about how reasonable these pathetic excuses for this poster are, based on technicalities.

What technicalities? Not taking down the poster isn't a technicality thats just plain strange. I imagine lots of the parents and teachers would have complained about a lynch mob being on clear view at the school, unless that is they are all complicit in harrassing the poor Head Teacher. The conspiracy widens...

Conspiracy? Strange? This is tin foil hat stuff.


A moderate empathy with other people would issue a completely different account. It's far more likely that she simply tried to ignore it, despite her distress, thinking that in time she'd be able to put behind her.


In the end it may have turned out to be a persistent stress that only increased over time, until eventually she needed to talk to someone about it. That person probably then put her into the system.


Nothing strange, no consipracy. Just real people behaving in understandable ways.

Most of this thread has actually been a form of cyber bullying on Mrs. Patterson. I am sure if you parents knew your children were doing the same thing, you'd be rightly alarmed and have them stop straight away! Sadly though, by the time you've found out - the damage is already done!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Used Mason & Green for airport transfers etc thanks to recommendations on here. Never been disappointed, always reliable. https://www.masonandgreen.co.uk/
    • I find the self diagnosis thing  a bit worrying. I once nearly died because a hospital  doctor misdiagnosed a ruptured ovarian cyst and peritonitis as food poisoning. It was lucky I hadn't initially diagnosed it as food poisoning myself and assumed  the sickness and pain would go away. I called my GP, who called an ambulance. I ended up having an emergency operation in a different hospital, the first hospital not having scanning facilities (this was in the olden days) 🙄
    • but GPs have your medical records. Perhaps  by "self diagnosis" you meant that you recognised the pain.
    • Some employers prefer older people as they are deemed to be more reliable, B and Q at one time had lots of 'older people'. I retired at 66  but on a casual visit to my old department, my former boss offered me a job saying I could name my hours. Would have loved to taken him up on it but the reason I took 'early retirement' was that my arthritis restricted my mobility re walking and standing for periods of time.  I would say it may not be ageism but not being deemed suitable for the position.  Someone I know was always looking for part time work but having spoken to her over a period of years, although she may have had the qualifications  needed for the work, her general attitude towards others and her very set views, I could understand why she found paid employment difficult to achieve. Can you do voluntary work? This may give you additional transferable skills.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...