Jump to content

Recommended Posts

NHS Reforms - some basic propositions for discussion:


Stop regarding the NHS, a system created 70 years ago to serve a very different country and population, as a sacred cow that cannot be changed, developed or improved.


1. Reduce bureaucracy and get rid of SHAs and PCTs - saving approximately ?10bn a year.


2. Hand over the decisions about what treatments are required, where they are carried out and when they are carried out to primary care professionals that meet patients every day.


NOTE: Additional management and transactions costs of 2. approximately ?5bn a year. Net saving from 1 & 2 = ?5bn a year.


3. Give most NHS managers a spinal stiffener to enable them to confront and weed out the lazy, incompetent and dangerous staff they all know are in the system.


4. Keep the NHS free at the point of delivery and tax funded - but allow top ups (for example to purchase drugs on trial and not yet NICE approved, or to move to a side rooms, or to purchase food from the restaurant across the road rather than suffer warmed up "cook/chill" slop).


5. Allow the primary care professionals to purchase care from whoever and wherever they find most effective, efficient, safe and price sensitive.


6. Support private healthcare - every person that is treated at their personal(or insurer's) cost represents money that doesn't have to be spent by the NHS - so its funding goes further toward treating those that cannot afford private healthcare. WARNING ANECDOTE: In Cambridge, with a large liberal left / academic population, approximately 12.5% of the population have private health insurance - much provided by the University to its lecturers and dons. Yet overall up to 50% of those insured do not use their insurance - preferring to quote "support their local NHS". This is very shortsighted thinking.


7. Politicians and government should treat the public like grown ups and not pretend, for the sake of votes, that it is possible to have a hospital on every street corner and a 24/7 GP service in every home.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16871-nhs-reforms/#findComment-429792
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disclaimer, some of the later  SMB stuff is insipid but I like this.  I
    • I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money.  When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too.   Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.  
    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.    Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!!  
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...