Jump to content

Recommended Posts

NHS Reforms - some basic propositions for discussion:


Stop regarding the NHS, a system created 70 years ago to serve a very different country and population, as a sacred cow that cannot be changed, developed or improved.


1. Reduce bureaucracy and get rid of SHAs and PCTs - saving approximately ?10bn a year.


2. Hand over the decisions about what treatments are required, where they are carried out and when they are carried out to primary care professionals that meet patients every day.


NOTE: Additional management and transactions costs of 2. approximately ?5bn a year. Net saving from 1 & 2 = ?5bn a year.


3. Give most NHS managers a spinal stiffener to enable them to confront and weed out the lazy, incompetent and dangerous staff they all know are in the system.


4. Keep the NHS free at the point of delivery and tax funded - but allow top ups (for example to purchase drugs on trial and not yet NICE approved, or to move to a side rooms, or to purchase food from the restaurant across the road rather than suffer warmed up "cook/chill" slop).


5. Allow the primary care professionals to purchase care from whoever and wherever they find most effective, efficient, safe and price sensitive.


6. Support private healthcare - every person that is treated at their personal(or insurer's) cost represents money that doesn't have to be spent by the NHS - so its funding goes further toward treating those that cannot afford private healthcare. WARNING ANECDOTE: In Cambridge, with a large liberal left / academic population, approximately 12.5% of the population have private health insurance - much provided by the University to its lecturers and dons. Yet overall up to 50% of those insured do not use their insurance - preferring to quote "support their local NHS". This is very shortsighted thinking.


7. Politicians and government should treat the public like grown ups and not pretend, for the sake of votes, that it is possible to have a hospital on every street corner and a 24/7 GP service in every home.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16871-nhs-reforms/#findComment-429792
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...