Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is there anything that can be done about vehicles which sit for ages churning out fumes?


I was sitting in my front bedroom and became aware of fumes filling the room, even though my windows were closed. I looked out of the window and there was a guy sitting right outside my house in a large van, on the phone with his engine running.


I went and asked him to turn it off and he wouldn't. I said the fumes were making me feel ill inside my house, and he told me that was my problem.


It was a Vauxhall Vivaro CDTI and I have the registration number. I presume he is working somewhere in this road or nearby.


Is there anything I can do about this? Is there any way of reporting it somewhere?


The pollution in this area is a real problem, and I have asthma. I hate to think what it is doing to all the small children round here whose lungs are still developing.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/168684-polluting-vehicles/
Share on other sites

It's a legal requirement to turn off the engine. Highway code rule 123

"You MUST NOT ... leave a vehicle engine running unnecessarily while that vehicle is stationary on a public road. Generally, if the vehicle is stationary and is likely to remain so for more than a couple of minutes, you should apply the parking brake and switch off the engine to reduce emissions and noise pollution."


Not sure how you can enforce it though.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only thing you can do is tackle it head-on,

> with a smile and an overabundance of politeness

> (and caution). If it is a firm, ring the head

> office if the driver doesn't do as you ask.



The van was unmarked, and the driver wouldn't tell me who he worked for.


And I'm afraid I was neither smiling nor cautious.


In fact when he wouldn't turn the engine off (and no, it wasn't a refrigerated van) and told me it was my problem if I was feeling ill from the fumes, I shouted at him :(


ETA: I'm not proud of this.


ETA: Thanks for that info Mark, I shall look it up, print it out, and keep copies about my person to hand to these polluting drivers in future. They shall all know The Wrath of Sue :))

EPB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it true that refrigerated vehicles have to keep

> their engines running in order to maintain the

> cooling system?


Not now. Quite a few run with just the ignition key turned on. Lots of trailers are self-contained units (not that an artic is likely to be in the side streets of ED!!).

I was in the playground of our local park (mayow park) recently with my 4 year old son.

An ice-cream van was parked there in the center of the park and less than 30 meters away from the gates of the playground.


The exhaust fumes of that antiquated diesel engine were VERY noticeable and unpleasant. (The noise too actually, but at least that is not detrimental to the health of my child)


I assume it stayed there, engine running for most of the day.


I will find a channel to complain about that to the council or whoever is in charge of authorizing it.


There is enough you can't do when it comes to reducing children's exposure to air pollution.





On a side note, I also have problems with the notion of tempting children with sugar and calories in places where they should exercise and be active.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a legal requirement to turn off the engine.

> Highway code rule 123

> "You MUST NOT ... leave a vehicle engine running

> unnecessarily while that vehicle is stationary on

> a public road. Generally, if the vehicle is

> stationary and is likely to remain so for more

> than a couple of minutes, you should apply the

> parking brake and switch off the engine to reduce

> emissions and noise pollution."


This is another example of where the Highway Code is not an accurate exposition of the law.


The relevant law can be found at Regulations 98 and 107 of The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mark Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's a legal requirement to turn off the

> engine.

> > Highway code rule 123

> > "You MUST NOT ... leave a vehicle engine

> running

> > unnecessarily while that vehicle is stationary

> on

> > a public road. Generally, if the vehicle is

> > stationary and is likely to remain so for more

> > than a couple of minutes, you should apply the

> > parking brake and switch off the engine to

> reduce

> > emissions and noise pollution."

>

> This is another example of where the Highway Code

> is not an accurate exposition of the law.

>

> The relevant law can be found at Regulations 98

> and 107 of The Road Vehicles (Construction and

> Use) Regulations 1986.


I'm reminded of this every time I walk past the two Southwark camera spy cars parked on Lordship Lane every day, with their engines running, to make profit for APCOA.

Looking at Southwark's website they are interested in people reporting engine idling 'hotspots' to them, nothing about one-offs. Would help address engine idling around schools at least, if people report it.


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/air-quality/reporting-air-quality-complaints

This might also be of interest, for anyone wanting to actively try to tackle it - they run action events in 15 boroughs including Southwark in partnership with local council - provide training and then pair people up to approach car drivers idling to try and encourage them to change their behaviour.


https://idlingaction.london/

New vehicles automatically cut out the engine when stationary and restart it when the brake comes off. In the future, all vehicles will do this. The law does not seem to be clear from Edhistory's post but it is always a good idea to count to ten when frustrated, and then be calm when asking for something. It tends to bring the helpful side out of a person more often than not. At least we are no longer burning coal fires and having to battle with smog every other day. The technology to get rid of vehicle pollution is already there. It will just take time for it to work through new vehicle sales.

nunhead_man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "At least we are no longer burning coal fires and

> having to battle with smog every other day"

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/2

> 9/wood-burning-stove-ban-will-not-be-enforced-agai

> nst-householders


Khan could easily make an impact here, by banning garages and stores from selling poor quality soft wood logs. Along with illegal bituminous house coal.

If you have the right wood burning appliance and kiln dried wood at sub 20% then the emmissions are within the confines of the law. I understand DEFFRA are to issue a 'ready to burn' standard for wood.


I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that coal stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to burn, why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

It's not exactly hidden from view.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that coal

> stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to burn,

> why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

> It's not exactly hidden from view.



It isn't coal, is it?


It's smokeless fuel.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that coal

> > stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to burn,

> > why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

> > It's not exactly hidden from view.

>

>

> It isn't coal, is it?

>

> It's smokeless fuel.


Yes REAL coal often. So often I'm gobsmacked to say.


Along with smokeless fuel.

If you want to moan about polluting vehicles and Khans mission to clean the air then why not also ask TFL to get bus drivers to switch off their engines (or switch to electric mode for the hybrids) when buses "wait for a short time to regulate the service"


Madness that they sit there for up to five minutes pumping out fumes when this happens

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Seabag Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > >

> > > I'm often gobsmacked at the sight of that

> coal

> > > stuff for sale in winter. It's illegal to

> burn,

> > > why they don't clamp down on it I don't know.

>

> > > It's not exactly hidden from view.

> >

> >

> > It isn't coal, is it?

> >

> > It's smokeless fuel.

>

> Yes REAL coal often. So often I'm gobsmacked to

> say.

>

> Along with smokeless fuel.



Who is selling coal round here?

bels123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This might also be of interest, for anyone wanting

> to actively try to tackle it - they run action

> events in 15 boroughs including Southwark in

> partnership with local council - provide training

> and then pair people up to approach car drivers

> idling to try and encourage them to change their

> behaviour.

>

> https://idlingaction.london/


Good idea to pair people up..

I had a cab outside mine with the engine running while he ate his lunch and read the paper. There should be a reporting system for cabs

This is not new

http://www.islingtongazette.co.uk/news/crime-court/drivers-who-leave-motor-running-in-islington-will-be-fined-in-first-idling-campaign-in-the-country-1-3707742

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Very sad to see H&B on LL. Will still go to Health Matters! 
    • H&B Is coming to Lordship Lane  It will be next to the Large St Christophers in Lordship Lane Also just to confirm that Oliver Bonas is taking over the 2 white stuff shops (i spoke to the builders yesterday and they confirmed they are breaking through to combine all three shops)
    • So here we go again, but with a proposal for a bigger and longer event. This despite the massive failings (again) last year with serious & long lasting damage to our park throughout the summer, lack of effective waste management, widespread public nuisance by the attendees, and of course the noise. Every year GALA are set conditions for their event licence, every year they fail to meet them, then every year they are granted a licence again - depressing. First impressions from the site plan - the proposed footprint has increased dramatically, sprawling further down & across our park (image attached with 2024 footprint in orange & 2025 extension in red). There  will be a music stage within 50m of our front room. The entrance area will be on a sports pitch. The trackway for heavy plant access will be across two sports fields. The entrance / exit for heavy plant will be opposite a school. The road at that point is regularly gridlocked due to parked & waiting cars. Increased trackway = increased damage to grass. I'm sure there's plenty more that is unacceptable... It's clear that we all need to comment on this consultation, but it's not clear how to actually add comments / participate. The email & consultation document both direct you to the GALA page on the council website - www.southwark.gov.uk/Gala2025 - but this only has details of the GALA PR sessions, not the official consultation. I've raised this with the council, I'll post if I get a response. I've also raised the issue that the council's Outdoor Event Policy states that "Applications for major events must be submitted a minimum of nine months prior to the event start date.", which would have been August 29th 2024 for this application. This is apparently necessary to give sufficient time for things like consultations...
    • I'm sorry to see another chain opening up in the form of Holland and Barratt a couple of doors up from SMBS.  That will be another unfair pressure on SMBS .  I really hope people continue to support SMBS and its relative shop The Cheese Block under huge pressure with the arrival of Mons and Bora.  These are two of the oldest surviving (30 years plus?) green grocers, deli and unusual ingredient food shops in Lordship Lane and made it an interesting high street long before the chains and  newbies moved in.  I would think Healthmatters is none too happy either 😕 Support your local independent store or Lordship Lane will get really dull 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...