Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Back in the dim golden past when urchins frolicked in the chip papers and everyone used the bagwash and had paraffin heaters, shops were open five and a half days at best with no Sunday trading and half day closing.


But we were happy then, though we were poor

Because we were poor! We used to live in a tiny old house...etc etc.

You all scoff but the sad reality is gentrification continues to divide communities between the haves and have nots more strinkingly than ever. Yes there are positives, but the negatives far outweigh those. If you allow the market to run riot, humanity becomes nothing more than a transit commodity, whose worth is dependent on its monetary value. Very sad.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You all scoff but the sad reality is

> gentrification continues to divide communities

> between the haves and have nots more strinkingly

> than ever.



There have always been haves and have nots.


Have you not noticed?

All business people are opportunists, DF. Whether what they trade in appeals to your personal tastes or not, they all depend on the business working commercially - no minimum wage for the self-employed. Even charities, whose primary motivation isn't profit, have to be financially viable. These days it's only in the public sector that workers are cushioned and removed from this reality.
Any area may be in one of three modes - stasis; gentrification (improvement?); decay. Some clearly prefer stasis (but in fact that can rarely be achieved and many would consider it unattractive) - in which case of the choices gentrification or decay I would prefer gentrification. Stasis can only work/ will only happen when the population is entirely static, and when the economy is stagnant - if you live in a dynamic city (and I like doing so) then change is inevitable, and I would prefer change to be improving, not decaying, my environment.

Houses of Parliament..


In a state of Decay.. Full of asbestos.. Dangerous wiring.. Crumbling masonry.. no longer fit for purpose..

Lets have some Gentrification here. Pull it down and build a new one.


Why spend Millions on trying to repair it. ? Perhaps keep The Elizabeth Tower.


Fox

Sell it to Malaysians, they can repair it and make it into an hotel or apartments, move Parliament to Birmingham. And give no second home allowances so all the MPs have to live in a clean but basic hostel. Then we'd get genuine public servants who have a calling instead of failed lawyers who like the trappings and the expense accounts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • WhatsApp Niko - 07818 607583 We've relied on Niko for many jobs; some major, some not so. The thing is, whatever he's done for us, he's been reliable, punctual, fastidious, and tidy. He knows his trade, and he does it really well. These are just a few of the reasons why we and many others recommend him so highly.  Steve & Meg  
    • I am no expert, but are your photos not saved in Google or similar, as well as being on your physical  phone? If so, you should just be able to access them on your new phone without actually having to move them over? Same with emails, normally, you just have to sign into your email account on your new phone to access them? Not sure re contacts, but I don't recall having any problems when getting a new phone. And apps you can just reinstall. Google or something like ChatGPT could probably "talk" you through sorting, deleting and editing photos and emails, if you can't find someone to help (sorry I can't, I'd be too worried about doing something wrong!) Good luck! Don't delete anything from your old phone until you are sure it's on your new phone!
    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...