Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Back in the dim golden past when urchins frolicked in the chip papers and everyone used the bagwash and had paraffin heaters, shops were open five and a half days at best with no Sunday trading and half day closing.


But we were happy then, though we were poor

Because we were poor! We used to live in a tiny old house...etc etc.

You all scoff but the sad reality is gentrification continues to divide communities between the haves and have nots more strinkingly than ever. Yes there are positives, but the negatives far outweigh those. If you allow the market to run riot, humanity becomes nothing more than a transit commodity, whose worth is dependent on its monetary value. Very sad.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You all scoff but the sad reality is

> gentrification continues to divide communities

> between the haves and have nots more strinkingly

> than ever.



There have always been haves and have nots.


Have you not noticed?

All business people are opportunists, DF. Whether what they trade in appeals to your personal tastes or not, they all depend on the business working commercially - no minimum wage for the self-employed. Even charities, whose primary motivation isn't profit, have to be financially viable. These days it's only in the public sector that workers are cushioned and removed from this reality.
Any area may be in one of three modes - stasis; gentrification (improvement?); decay. Some clearly prefer stasis (but in fact that can rarely be achieved and many would consider it unattractive) - in which case of the choices gentrification or decay I would prefer gentrification. Stasis can only work/ will only happen when the population is entirely static, and when the economy is stagnant - if you live in a dynamic city (and I like doing so) then change is inevitable, and I would prefer change to be improving, not decaying, my environment.

Houses of Parliament..


In a state of Decay.. Full of asbestos.. Dangerous wiring.. Crumbling masonry.. no longer fit for purpose..

Lets have some Gentrification here. Pull it down and build a new one.


Why spend Millions on trying to repair it. ? Perhaps keep The Elizabeth Tower.


Fox

Sell it to Malaysians, they can repair it and make it into an hotel or apartments, move Parliament to Birmingham. And give no second home allowances so all the MPs have to live in a clean but basic hostel. Then we'd get genuine public servants who have a calling instead of failed lawyers who like the trappings and the expense accounts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes..that may be the case but membership STARTING at £115 a month is still unafforable for many. Council gyms also have a large range of equipment and I had a  PT at Dulwich leisure centre when I was in Full Time employment who was incredible and even kept in contact during lockdown giving me a program I could do at home and checking in weekly at no charge or personal gain for herself. I dont doubt that Fit For may be a good gym (Its been in situ long enough so must be doing something right) However the cost of membership means it is affordable for the few not the many. If I could afford that kind of fee I would rather get a train to Canary Wharf and go to Virgin active where theres a pool and incredible classes and facilities 
    • This sounds great 👍 
    • We found a red TREK bike yesterday that had clearly been stolen and dumped. Would love to reunite it with its owner. Get in touch if you know whose it is.
    • Hey, I am interested. I had started a club last year however everyone slowly dropped off but I am always up for morning runs and some evening runs too.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...