Jump to content

Ignorant Cyclists in the Park


Recommended Posts

Manda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


I got knocked down by a cyclist

> last year when he jumped a light and he cycled off

> without saying a word, despite almost coming off

> himself. It winded me and I couldn't get up for

> several minutes. It's made me view them as a

> danger and they really don't like to hear that

> they are dangerous. I think they are battling

> through traffic all day and just see pedestrians

> as another thing to battle. In the pecking order,

> pedestrians are at the bottom of the pile.



I'm very sorry to hear you got knocked down. I'm a cyclist and I certainly wouldn't leave the scene of an accident like that. The one time I've been involved in one - a pedestrian looking in the opposite direction to the flow of traffic marched quickly across the width of the pavement and into the road - I stopped.


But that takes me to the point I was going to make. I'm afraid to say pedestrians are the biggest danger I face as I cycle through 8 miles of London each way each day. They do the daftest things with no warning whatsoever. So many of them are plugged into ear-wrenching music that ringing your bell (and mine's loud) makes not a jot of difference. It's pretty much every day that I see a very near miss involving a pedestrian and some kind of wheeled transport.


None of that justifies careering around frightening people, blazing through red lights, leaving the scene of an accident. I just wanted to point out that as a cyclist I view pedestrians with extreme suspicion and try to always be on the watch for what they might do next. It's a reason not to whistle past them at close quarters!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also a cyclist that leaves the scene of an accident is committing the same offence as a driver who does so. There is no excuse for any cyclist jumping red lights, hitting anyone and then cycling off, as I think every one would agree.


On the London roads though, cyclists do have to be assertive and ride defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not just on roads, we should cycle defensively pretty much everywhere. Since Dulwich Park was quiet tonight, I did a few laps of it just for the fun of it. On one of the laps, I spotted a guy walking along the edge of the road with a dog lead in his hand but no dog in sight... so I slowed down just in case his dog suddenly came bounding along.


On my commute, I know the roads where pedestrians are likely to behave unpredictably (near stations primarily) just as I know the junctions where drivers are more likely to go through on amber and you tailor your riding accordingly.


Cowbells? Hmm.... perhaps we should convert D-locks into bells - would have the advantage not only of alerting others but acting as a useful theft deterrent when locked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just something that I have to put up with; I usually use the Greendale Cycle path when out riding it and always gets me that people walk on the cycle path instead of the footpath and then when I announce that I'm coming up behind them I get moaned at even though they are walking on the cycle route.


Pearson- you wear Rapha??? I could only dream of affording Rapha. I'm afraid its Decathlon cycle clothing for the likes of me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We are also missing some birthday cards that we know were sent and never turned up. I 100% do not trust our local postal service
    • There are 12 inner London boroughs.   I hope your personal situation gets resolved.
    • Hi, any rail out there for hanging? Can collect really soon  
    • Hi  does anyone have experience of the police misreporting crime? I have very recent experience of them misreporting a crime of one of the most serious and violent types in this area and rather misclassifying it as a very low level, ordinary type of crime and one that has little to no victims. Furthermore, the Police have then immediately closed the case and said that there’s nothing that they can do even though they haven’t undertaken some of the most basic investigative procedures such as interviewing witnesses, checking CCTV etc… Southwark Council who also have a material role in this have are complicit with the police in this deliberate misreporting of a very serious and violent crime.  The local council representatives are also complicit Each of these bodies say that there is nothing that they can do. As a minimum, it seems as though all these parties deliberately want to misreport a very serious and violent crime as a very low category crime and then close the case immediately because they want their crime stats to look good. The Independent Office for Police Conduct merely states that they will refer any complaint to the police force in question who will investigate it themselves in the first instance! Separately, the Southwark Council Serious Violence & Duty Strategy 2023-24 states that: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/242858/Serious-Violence-Duty-Strategy-2023-2024.pdf    - Southwark has the 10th highest rate of serious violence in London  - the five year trend is upward  - the Police had identified 43 Organised Crime Gangs in Southwark at Dec 2022  - that “the illegal drug market was worth millions to the local economy” - implying that they didn’t wish to stop it as it would be very bad to the local economy!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...