Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've never really noticed it either and until they changed the flight paths a couple of years ago I was right under one with planes travelling from 4am! But when my mother came to stay she noticed it right away. I guess some people are more sensitive to noise than others and I have always been able to sleep through anything anyway.
Thanks for the info, we wondered what was going on as they seem to shift the flight paths more over 24 hours than they used to. If we hit the jackpot and have the 4 am flight path over us, you can guarantee we'll have 2 little chaps in our bedroom thinking it's morning within ten minutes. It's no fun facing a school day when you are 4 and 6 year's old after starting the day at 4 am. I will certainly be following your thread. I've also been wondering how many loose flight time rules will be broken when everyone arrives for the olympics?

I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask for less night flights (most airports in Germany, inc Frankfurt, have a complete ban and it doesn't seem to have hurt their economy) or for flights to be more widely dispersed over London when landing. There are no technical reasons for planes to have to fly over Dulwich to land at Heathrow, they could just as well jet north over Epsom and do a hard bank left at Twickenham (as anyone who ever flew into the old HK airport will attest to).


I always found it's best when submitting things to the government to do it as a group though, so perhaps it would make sense to post a draft response up and allow others on the forum to sign it?

stephent, I used to live near Twickenham - the planes really were loud there!


By all means complain about flights late at night or early in the morning, but I don't see what anyone could acheive by complaining about the route. All of London (and SE England in general) is densely populated, any route is probably going to disturb somebody.

Some of these responses beggar belief! We live in a big city so we should apparently accept anything and everything. Well, we could just as easily say that London congestion would be eased by building 4-lane motorways out of town. The Southbound one could go down Lordship Lane. And those who object should "get real or move out". Ridiculous.


London is quite unique among European cities in having the main approach for its largest airport directly over the entire town. This was a disastrous planning error. The noise and pollution affect millions every day.


Some people are heavy sleepers, many are light sleepers. The planes fly directly over my house and while for 11 years I have just got on with my life, I haven't got used to the noise. I welcome any form of consultation from the government on this.

.....and anyone who is bothered by this and tempted to think it's not worth responding to the consultation should bear in mind what happened with Heathrow's 3rd runway. In early 2009 that was looking like a done deal, Geoff Hoon having given the go ahead.


Some on this thread would probably have suggested those campaigning against it should move to Orkney/accept the fact we live in a global capital city/stop moaning etc etc ... but the campaign went on, the Conservatives (whatever your view of them) clearly recognised it as a hot election issue, promised to overturn the decision and promptly did so on forming the Coalition.


Like them or not, this Government is evidently prepared to make decisions that annoy the aviation industry. My personal hunch is this is because west London areas such as Richmond and Kew, blighted by noise for decades, are traditionally Tory, and Labour tended not to be so bothered by what people living there thought. A totally unresearched generalisation I know.


So to generalise yet more......... my conclusion is that many people (ie voters) don't like aircraft noise, especially very early in the morning. The present Government has demonstrated it recognises the issue as a potential vote winner. This consultation is a golden opportunity to ensure they know how widespread the affected areas are, and call for a reduction/ban/flight path variation of early morning landings.

Personally I think any party(within reason) that pledged to ban Heathrow landings before 6am would secure hundreds of thousands of votes at the next election

Major Algy Wymondham (Major Algernon 'Algy' Archibald Percival Cholmondeley-Phipps Wymondham) Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I live off Northcross Road and I never notice the damn noise until after I have read about it on the

> EDF (usually happens about this time every year).

> To be fair, my hearing isn't what it used to be.


Neither is your new user name. What other name(s) do you or have you posted as?

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi and thank you very much for posting the link to the consultation, which I completed this morning. I have to be honest and admit that I also find it a bit hard to believe that some people think we should just sit back and take all kinds of assaults just because we live in London! By the same token, people should not complain about graffity in their street....they live in London after all and you get graffity in big cities!


The fact that the government is running a consultaiton means that it is a widespread concern and not just a few people whingeing(as someone said in an earlier post, it is a matter of disastrous town planning the fact that hundreds of planes everyday have to 'park' over London to get to Heathrow).


This morning I was waken up by 3 planes passing over my house between 5am and 5.30am! (by the way, I do have double glazing and wear earplugs because otherwise I would wake up before 6am everyday thanks to the planes, but one of them had fallen out. However this is not a solution. What about people that have kids? They certainly can't sleep with earplugs...


It is important to remember that when we are not passengers (which is most of the time) we are all citizens that have the right to a night sleep and to be productive the following day....The economy would not collapse if planes were not allowed to fly to HTW between 11pm and 7am and to suggest otherwise is madness. At the end of the day nobody on this forum bought one of the houses near Heathrow going cheap. We bougth a house nowhere near the airport and it is only fair that we demand that planes do not fly during the night or too early in the morning. The current agreement ends in October 2012 and I am really concerned that the rules preventing Heathrow from receiving flights throughout the nigth will be relaxed.


It's importat to act and to fill in the consultation questionnaire.....otherwise we will all end up having to move!

I've lived in ED for over 25 years, and the problem has most definitely got a whole lot worse in that time. In the mid-80s there really was no aircraft noise.


I can put up with high noise levels while sitting in the garden/outside during the day (raising voices, waiting for the plane to go over before you speak), but the early morning flights are a killer. Your mileage may vary: the noise experienced depends on exact location and the terrain as well as the weather, and which way your bedroom faces etc. etc., and indeed how good your hearing is and how you as an individual respond to certain frequencies. I find ear plugs are not so good at dealing with the lower, rumbling frequencies which the planes make as they bank.


Thanks for the link, taper.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think a lot of people here are just speculating about empty student accommodation properties. Student accommodation developments are very popular because they provide really great rates of return for the owner. A large student accommodation owner, Unite Students, saw 97.5% occupancy across their assets in the 2024/2025 academic year. They have many properties in London; https://pbsanews.co.uk/2024/10/09/unite-students-reports-record-occupancy-rates-in-q3-2024-update/ Here's a bit from CBRE on PBSA properties in London from May 2024: https://www.cbre.co.uk/press-releases/london-plan-policy-fails-to-deliver-affordable-student-accommodation - "According to new research by CBRE and QX Global, the gap between demand for PBSA and available supply in London currently stands at 100,000 – 105,000 full-time students, underscoring how demand for student housing has outpaced supply." - The development pipeline in London isn't keeping up with the demand. Ultimately this development wouldn't be built if student accommodation wasn't in demand. It's proximity to the station means that a student could get to any number of universities easily in a short span of time. Is it ideal? No. Would more affordable housing be better? Yes. Is speculating about channel migrants occupying the space uninformed idiocy? Absolutely.
    • Really pleased your cats are both home now, but what a very difficult situation.
    • it isn't said on any news source that I look at. Are you asking on social media whether what you read on other social media is true?
    • Thank you. Yes we scanned him last time, he is neutered & chipped. We asked neighbours who were feeding him to keep him in as, owner said she wasn't back till following day. That night whilst he was kept in, Gladys came back. The owner lives on a street who's garden  backs onto my friends garden. We asked neighbour that kept him in for night, to not feed him anymore. The owner said not long after she got him, he went out January, never went back till December! I did say so you don't want the cat, she said yes she does but she can't lock him in. I suggested she leaflet all houses who's back gardens back onto hers, to say to stop feeding him. She didn't do it. So until people stop feeding him, he will be a problem as he obviously doesn't want to go home and all the time she never saw him, there was no posters up looking for him, so it's one of those situations! He is a beautiful fluffy black and white and is enormous. Don't know what the solution would be if owner not bothered. Celia hammond overflowing, even kitten season was early this year. Can't take a owned cat though I'm sure he isn't happy. I'm hoping Gladys and Doris will go back home if he isn't loitering. Yes their owner does spray him with water but has little impact. It is a real problem and a worry that they are too frightened to go home and may travel further away. That is the real worry. Will keep post updated. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...