Jump to content

Empty Properties suitable for Squatting in Dulwich

LadyJane

By LadyJane
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

karter

karter

Posted
Posted

Hi Ladyjane, welcome to the EDF,


Firstly if you do happen to take over one of our properties that is empty at the moment hope you dont mind that our 'gang' sees you off the property as peacefully as possible.


Secondly, do your research, i don't beleive the concrete place has gas or electricity.


Thirdly, take some of the forumite's advice as it is concrete.


Good luck and hopefully not see you soon. :))

pinkhalf

pinkhalf

Posted
Posted

Just out of curiousity, how many people who are enraged by this are long term London residents?


Squatting in London used to be absolutely everywhere (particularly during the last recession). I'm surprised its even considered worthy of comment - except it might be if you had only lived here for the last ten years or so and didn't know how common it used to be. Squatters were normally tolerated if they contributed something back to the community. Many of them had jobs (and good ones). You cannot assume that someone in a squat has no employment. Often they are there because they pay very little rent and they save money this way at very little risk to them.


Likewise this van business, that isn't very new either. What seems to be new is people being outraged about it happening. I can only assume that many Dulwich residents are either very new to London or have lived very sheltered existences.


By the way, if you are properly paranoid about squatters, you used to get sitters in for a reduced rent. Commercial businesses still do this.

JessieW

JessieW

Posted
Posted
How about the thousands of pounds the home owners have to pay in law fees to get these squatters to leave, sometimes it can take 6 months to get these people out. The squatters then have the right to fight to stay, whilst using lawyer that is paid for by us, the taxpayer, to fight the home owner in court. I really don't understand how anyone can accept this as normal or even acceptable. Squatters don't pay tax, don't work, what sort of contribution could they possibly give to the communitity?
pinkhalf

pinkhalf

Posted
Posted

JessieW, I have certainly met squatters with jobs in the past. You cannot say they universally do not have jobs. You assume they do not have jobs, fair enough. You assume also they contribute nothing.


25 years ago it was very common to have squatters in your street. I admit London has changed a fair bit since then, but it is by no means as weird or unusual as you think it is. Squatters did, once upon a time, realise that unless they did contribute to their communities, they would be hated. Generally they occupied buildings which were near derelict and abandoned, rather than some plush mansion occupied by overseas owners.


Pro squatters (that is people who did it for years rather than being some twenty year old bum) tended be sensible and assuaged fears of locals. Stupid ones ended up with petrol through their letter boxes.


Still, if its a question of paying for people to live somewhere they can't afford, housing benefit claimants are an immediate sap on the public purse which I do pay for. That problem is far more financially significant that squatters. I have no idea why I should pay to subsidise someone living in Zone 1/2 if they cannot afford it by themselves. What do housing benefits claimants contribute?

pinkhalf

pinkhalf

Posted
Posted
Appropo this thread, it turns out I need a new home for my several dogs on a string (mange, benefit claimants, never worked and carry immigrant fleas) - can anyone help me break into a small, overpriced workers cottage with designer furniture in East Dulwich and alienate all my neighbours? Please?
fluffy

fluffy

Posted
Posted
Slightly baffled as to the assumption that someone who claims housing benefit contributes nothing to society? Presumably people in low paid jobs which are needed should also have to commute several hours to work? Must say I'm slightly surprised to see such small mindedness.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • vladi
      Lordship Lane Post Office Closure

      By vladi · Posted

      You can use PayPal to send money and it is free of charge if you chose to send it as a gift to friends or family.
    • beansprout
      Ski trousers - size 14/16

      By beansprout · Posted

      Hi, Self explanatory anyone help or point me in  right direction please.   Thanks  
    • Penguin68
      Lordship Lane Post Office Closure

      By Penguin68 · Posted

      Cheques are still the safest way to send money to others if you want to make a 'thing' of it. At Christmas or birthdays a card with a cheque is the most effective present to distant god children or extended family, for instance when you don't know what they have or need - made out to the parent if you don't think they have an account yet. Of course you can use electronic transfer, often, to parents if you set it up, but that doesn't quite have the impact of a cheque in the post. So a cheque still has a use, I believe, even when you have very much reduced your cheque writing for other purposes.
    • Moovart
      Had to take a second look!

      By Moovart · Posted

      I believe "Dulwich" is deemed where Dulwich library is situated so left at Peckham rye and straight up Barry Road

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...