Jump to content

WANTED - Couple looking for 2 bed flat in East Dulwich/Peckham - ?1700 pcm - Long Let


devin3

Recommended Posts

We are a young professional couple, both working full time, seeking a 2 bed flat. We?ve outgrown our current 1-bed and looking for a bit of extra space. We?ve rented privately from landlords over the past several years and can provide excellent references.


Budget is up to ?1700 pcm, and would prefer something within ? mile of Goose Green. Could go a bit higher, but will of course be relative to the place.


Requirements:

? 2 bedrooms (ok if one is smaller)

? Within walking distance of Peckham Rye overground & East Dulwich Rail

? Must have private garden (though roof terrace may be considered)

? Both Furnished and Unfurnished will be considered



Please send pm if you have something of interest. Looking to move by end of October.


Thanks,

Devin

Hi Devin,

I hope you're well.

I am a private landlord and am looking for tenants for our 2-bed flat in Peckham Rye.

It's our former home, but we moved to Manchester seven years ago and our tenants have just moved out.

I've had it redecorated and refreshed throughout.

It is currently on Gumtree and Openrent, so you may seen it. If you haven't would you like to view it on Sat or Sun as I am coming down to show it to people.

My number is 07919 165934 if you'd like to have a chat.

Best wishes

Richard

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...