Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think a note of caution is needed with everyone saying planning permission isn't required: under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 any "building or enclosure" between the front boundary of a building and the public highway requires planning permission. Obviously Southwark have very sensibly decided to turn a blind eye to this as regards cycle storage, but there's nothing to stop them instigating a crackdown whenever they choose, as Brighton council did a few years ago: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2014/aug/01/brighton-green-council-crackdown-cycle-stores-barriers-cycling (note the sentence in the article, "Under national regulations any ?outbuilding? in front of a house (flats have different and more complex rules), even a compact bike shed, officially requires planning permission.").


Not to say don't build a bike shed by any means, just be aware that the potential is there for the council to object. Certainly best to make sure neighbours will be happy with it, because if they object they would certainly have the law on their side, even if it is an ass.

We had one built last year (120cm high). The council planners said that in theory, we should apply for planning, however, as long as it did not exceed any of the usual building limits, they would not enforce any kind of action or insist on the application, and that we can carry on and build it.

Unfortunately, our neighbours are complete tits and put in a planning appeal because we didn?t put in a planning application and they felt our bike shed was infringing on their right to enjoy their home (honestly, don?t get me started), so we had to do a retrospective planning application which was rubber stamped straight away.

The long and the short of it is, you shouldn?t need to apply, unless your neighbours are idiots.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gold men’s wedding band and signet ring suspected to have come off outside of William Rose, Moxons or Bora on Lordship Lane on Friday 9th January during the day. Please get in touch if found. Reward if returned!
    • Hello,  I am interested to know people's opinion regarding dogs left tied up outside shops.  As I am hoping most dog owners are aware of how high risk it is now for dog theft.  People's houses are targeted for dog theft, even waiting to have a dog out in their back gardens, even for few minutes, to steal.  This is a very common occurrence now, as is breaking into properties to steal dogs.  The reasons behind dog theft varies, from using to breed, sell on, to use to sit whilst asking for money, (obviously not all people asking for money are dog thieves & may well own their own dog) and for dog bait for fighting.  This is not me being a drama queen, it is there for anyone to research regarding dog theft.  So would you leave your dog tied up outside a shop? 
    • I don't know if any of the cricket or tennis clubs also have little gyms. There are also pilates studios on Melbourne Grove, Blackwater St, North Cross Rd and even the community hall of the church on Calton Ave. The David Lloyd gym in Orpington is very luxurious and expensive.  
    • HI CPR Dave, I have to agree with Dogkennelhillbilly. We still have net migration into the country as per the Office of National Statistics- https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration It may go negative in a year or two if pundits specialising in this are correct, but it isn't yet. Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, I don't think your maths is correct. Southwark Council states total empty homes at 8,588 -https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/housing/southwark-has-over-8500-empty-homes/ the total number of homes is 135k. Which means 6.36% are empty. However, while canvassing came across an empty home which does not appear to have been appreciated by Southwark Council who are now investigating whether the empty Home Council Tax Premium should have been applied for the last 10+ years. It seems likely the 8,588 is under reporting the number of empty homes.  Infill sites are defined by most public bodies was non strategic sites from a development perspective. The railway yard and other sites are in the Southwark strategic plans and thus would not be infill sites.  Tall buildings planted into lower surrounding suburban areas is a subjective matter whether they are viewed as out of character for the area. It is factually true that I think they are out of character. Equally you have no qualms about such tall buildings being planted into the SE22 area. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...