Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No problem westof. WE hoped that our eldest boy would get into Kingsdale - along with friends of his from different schools in Camberwell... I came over all emotional when we visited, I was truly impressed by it.


What do people think of Katharine Birbalsingh? She's planning a new secondary school in Lambeth, I'm not sure where yet but will know tomorrow when we meet.

I can't help wondering about the decision making process ( the rationale and input from Southwark ) behind the reduction * in roll of the Academy @ Peckham .

Maybe just to make space for the 2 form primary school it's opening on the same site ?


* from an annual entry of 240 to 180 . Hadn't realised it was such a big jump !

I wish I was in Texas right now:


"Thank you for your recent email.


Please be advised that the Department for Education aims to respond to all correspondence received within 15 working days where a response is required.


However, currently we are receiving exceptionally high volumes of correspondence and it may take longer for a reply to be issued to you.


We would like to thank you for your patience during this time.


Department for Education

http://www.education.gov.uk/"

I'm a journalist sitting in a BBC office surrounded by Oxford and Russell Group university graduates. 9 out of 11 including me didn't get Gove's invented EBAC because most of us only did one science - we're all arts graduates, or did two languages instead of doing Geography. It would be difficult to argue that we all failed to get a rounded education and we're now on the scrap heap! The EBAC, in its current form, has been criticised by a wide range of schools including grammars and independents.


My daughter is at Kingsdale and my son is going in September. I have nothing but praise for the school. There are a great many inequities in the educational system but they've been created by both Tory and Labour administrations. Kingsdale didn't create this marketplace or choose to be in a borough that's full of academies and faith schools. It has many more middle class children than it once did but also plenty of working class kids too. A couple of the Lewisham schools I visited couldn't have been described as comprehensives as they had disproprortionate numbers of children from disadvantaged backgrounds relative to the areas in which they were located.


I think people also need to realise that some of the 'local' Lewisham schools are about the same distance away from us as Kingsdale.

Sorry eliza can you elucidate please? As far as I can find EBAC is a brand of dehumidifier. Clearly I failed to get a rounded education and now am on the knowledge scrap heap! Which is exactly what I'm on about.


By the way - I was at primary and junior at a school in a Newcastle suburb where carrying flick knives and smoking were commonplace among 8 year olds and organised gang warfare took place at weekends on the common. The daily walk to and from school was a mental ordeal, never knowing if some band of brawling bullies (they were called hooligans then) would be waiting round a corner on the off chance some posh poof like me would be caught unawares. Most of us lived in justifiable fear from morning to night. Happy days.

Sounds to me Mark that your experience has made you very afraid that this will happen to your kid. I'm now understanding why you're ultra anxious about your child going to the 'wrong' school, which probably isn't helped at all with all of the horror stories you hear about gangs, knives etc in London. But, my brother is 13, grew up in one of the most deprived areas of London and has never been involved in any thing of this sort. I'd like to think that bullying is being tackled more in schools these days as well.
Not at all, I'm not ultra anxious about anything zeban. That was everyone's experience at that school. It was normal. I didn't like it much, I brought it up for the opposite purpose really - to illustrate that I know something of rough experiences. I've heard horror stories about bad behaviour in schools around here and they just remind me of my own time. I don't think the school I went to provided a bad education, it was just in a really tough part of town. My father taught at MUCH harder schools than mine. The battles on the common were something to behold. Like Braveheart on mogadon.
intexasathemoment - the reason they've reduced the numbers at Peck Acadamy is because the school is preparing to open a primary phase on the same site. I believe that there is already a nursery or will be very soon. PA will then become a through-academy with children from the Primary phase automatically transferring at 11 to the main senior academy. Rather than wait for us all to throw our hats into the ring, they've decided to knit their own intake. This way they will be able to identify children who need extra help or who are showing signs of ability and nurture accordingly. The head teacher is an inner city head who has a very clear understanding of inner city schools and I'm sure in a few years time we'll all be reading threads on this forum, asking why it is impossible to get into this school and how their intake is selected!

@CityMum - really good explanation of what's happening about Peckham Academy. Sounds dangerously like some good solid joined up for the long term thinking is going on there.


@Gubodge; thank you for that. My understanding has moved on a bit. The next question is?


Does it mean more subjects for longer and less specialisation than the traditional 3 A levels?

Mark - the EBac refers to a selection of GCSE's that Gove prefers (maths, English, science, a language and a humanity) ,so doesn't affect A levels .

The International Baccalaureate offers much broader depth than A levels and some schools offer it as an alternative .


Citymum - yes Peckham Academy has already opened a nursery on site ,as a precursor to the primary school .

I suppose I can understand Peckham Academy's thinking and imagine they're correct in thinking it will give them a good intake .But was it a decision they made on their own ?


It seems a bit ...isolationist ...,will suit the school ,but reduce secondary school places at a time when there is a shortage of secondary school places in the area . I wonder what real involvement ,if any ,Southwark had in this decision .

I say if any because I know for instance that Southwark recommends that children only sit one set of banding exams for the secondary transfer but have seemed powerless to prevent the Harris Academies having their own banding system and tests .

I worry that all the schools just end up as individual little states ,with no coordination .

Maybe that wouldn't matter ?

I don't know .


Apparently the new education bill has proposals to change the rules that regulate admissions - eg there will no longer be a requirement for local authorities to have local admissions forums . These are made up of parents, headteachers, faith group representatives, and local authority and academy staff, and are supposed to consider the fairness of admissions arrangements across an area. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/mar/22/schools-admissions-reform-select-pupils

And that does worry me .

Many thanks to those of you who explained bits and pieces about what frankly is an impenetrable pile of nonsense about our 'education system'. What emerges for me is:


1) There is no 'system' at all

2) It is letting everyone down, one way or another no one escapes the inequities of it

3) Attemps to correct it have been vastly expensive and are done in isolation from the whole and therefore doomed to only partial success

4) It's all breathtakingly stupid; no one has any control over changing it who doesn't have a political agenda

@Worrywart: I was just pondering how to deal with this when you posted. Yes, I met Katharine Birbalsingh this afternoon. From one meeting it seems our views are closely aligned.


She is demonstrably passionate about the need for all to have access to high quality education. It's clear that she cares enormously about the need for children from difficult to impossible backgrounds to get great schooling, and that children from all backgrounds should be educated together, and finds it scandalous that our education system works SO badly for so many people. She's convincing in her determination to make change happen.


She intends to set up a Free School and appears to know what needs to be done to make it happen. She has not found a site - so keep a look out.


I'm thinking about it.


Another thing; I'd heard and read quite a lot about Katharine before the dreaded day of school place reckoning came about and reading between the lines it seemed likely that she was being presented unfairly in many different ways. What I heard today backs up that impression. Long live the free press.

Just got back from steering group meeting for Katharine Birbalsingh's new community school. I know a lot more about the process now. I've already been told this by friends who are much more switched on than I am in this area and, to say the least, the practical hurdles set up by the government for these applications from parent and community groups are incredibly challenging... That said, the people Katharine brought together cover a very impressive range of skills, networks and experience. If anyone can jump the hurdles and get a successful school at the end of it, I think I saw them tonight.


Crucial to the success is finding a number of appropriate sites, in appropriate locations, to choose from. Just to make it clear - the outline below says Lambeth but if a site can be identified in Southwark it will not be dismissed.


This is an outline of the ethos of the proposed school:


Where tradition and innovation meet.

? Non-denominational, 11?18, mixed school in Lambeth

? Beginning with Year 7 only and will increase in size by one year group every year

? Four form entry school with 120 children in each year group

? At full capacity, the school will have 840 children, including 6th Form


Tradition

? Academic focus ? with an emphasis on knowledge acquisition

? Strong discipline ethos ? order and high expectations

? Rigorous competition ? all children will know where they stand in comparison to their peers and how to improve

? A love of learning how to think embedded in our ethos

? Ambition and hard work are the minimum expectations


Innovation

? Extended day will allow for Oxbridge preparation, reading club, homework club, debating club, anti-street-culture club, competitive sport, peripatetic music, drama, Latin

? Student voice

? Vertical & mixed-ability tutor groups

? Active parental involvement ? parents will be required to participate in their child?s learning

I absolutely agree with the need for more good schools but are free schools the way to go? I have serious doubts as to whether this is just endorsing a very flawed idea. The money will come from the public purse and at what cost to the existing system? Apparently a group of city people are keen to set up a free school in the Clapham area known as b'twixt the commons'. They have stated it is to serve the community. They've identified two potential feeder schools Honeywell and Bellevue Primaries - if you know Clapham, you'll know that these are the schools that people move house to get into. Oddly enough they appear to have forgotten about the primary school closest to the planned site. Apparently the school does not have the kind of children they want in their school. I'll leave you to imagine what this means... Isn't the free school idea just like selling off different railway lines to different companies and will we not end up with a system which is even more fragmented than it is already is? The doing away with LEA admissions forums will not do anything to help. I know that in theory to get a free school plan off the ground you have to demonstrate a real and genuine need but what does that mean exactly? And will we end up, like Mr Beecham's railway system with the prosperous areas well served at the expense of less attractive areas? I find the whole prospect rather scary, to be perfectly honest.
I seem to recall that the ED Hospital site was looked at with a view for secondary school potential when the action group who got The Charter off the ground were looking for a school site. I'm sure someone who knows better will come along & explain more/correct me, but I think that EDH is built on ground that was left to the borough on condition that it only be used for the good of Public Health or somesuch clause. This meant that it couldn't be used as a school.

CityMum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I absolutely agree with the need for more good

> schools but are free schools the way to go? I

> have serious doubts as to whether this is just

> endorsing a very flawed idea. The money will come

> from the public purse and at what cost to the

> existing system? Apparently a group of city

> people are keen to set up a free school in the

> Clapham area known as b'twixt the commons'. They

> have stated it is to serve the community. They've

> identified two potential feeder schools Honeywell

> and Bellevue Primaries - if you know Clapham,

> you'll know that these are the schools that people

> move house to get into. Oddly enough they appear

> to have forgotten about the primary school closest

> to the planned site. Apparently the school does

> not have the kind of children they want in their

> school. I'll leave you to imagine what this

> means... Isn't the free school idea just like

> selling off different railway lines to different

> companies and will we not end up with a system

> which is even more fragmented than it is already

> is? The doing away with LEA admissions forums

> will not do anything to help. I know that in

> theory to get a free school plan off the ground

> you have to demonstrate a real and genuine need

> but what does that mean exactly? And will we end

> up, like Mr Beecham's railway system with the

> prosperous areas well served at the expense of

> less attractive areas? I find the whole prospect

> rather scary, to be perfectly honest.



Well said.

Thanks Silly Woman -if the site isn't being used for public health I wonder whether those who handed over the site to the council could amend the terms of use.


I 100% agree that the extreme outcome of free schools is a nightmare for our society and if the Clapham story is correct I will be going to work to pay my taxes, (whilst paying massive child care costs) so that the the rich city Clapham bankers can set up a school that excludes half of the community and save themselves private school fees. You have got to admire the cheek!


Meanwhile I am looking at a future where I will be lucky to find a co-ed that will take my kids. My local co-ed secondary school has a lottery system that allows the Clapham bankers a go at getting their kids in there too! (I would love Harris to become co-ed.)


However there is at least 4 more years of this policy, a dire need for kids in this area together with Camberwell and Nunhead to have a local inclusive co-ed community school and if it's the 'free' way at the moment, or no way what choice do we have? As long as it is inclusive for all our community I would support it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
    • This web page lists some companies that recycle CDs https://www.reducereuserecycle.co.uk/where_can_I_recycle/cds_and_dvds.php  
    • I heard it as well, woke me up, very strange.  I don't care for myself but I do worry for people with children and animals, it is a nuisance and happens more and more nowadays.
    • Has that ever actually happened? The bags are quite bright, and don't blend in with the pavement, so are quite noticeable. But surely there can't be many  cases where someone has bothered to put the s**t in a bag,  but then just leaves the bag on the pavement?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...