Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No actually the laugh has been on most of the so called foodies of ED who have been paying prices equivelant and beyond that of some top drawer west end venues. I mean ?100 is ?30each on food ?25 on drinks + vat and tip surely ? I have just walked past one DulwichGastro with main courses at 18.50 and it certainly has not won Gastro pub of london, or even come close.

as the article said about the wine list


"The list could bitch slap most of what's on offer in central London not merely on range but on price"


so hey the starters may be a bit rich, but I am smashed on great wine at a good price, so yes I will have cheese board !

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1634-the-rosendale/#findComment-45134
Share on other sites

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What the 'you know sweet fa about food chip' yet

> wang on about banning cafe Nero, getting rid of

> Iceland and demolishing Somerfields in Hope that

> the Lord Marks & Spencer comes down from his

> mountain to save you all.


No, I mean 'chip on your shoulder' as in the actual meaning of the phrase, not a load of meaningless cobblers. Pay attention now..

"The phrase chip on one's shoulder means having a harboured grievance or sense of inferiority and being quick to take offence"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1634-the-rosendale/#findComment-45150
Share on other sites

Yes just checked that Bob and you appear to be right. I have also checked about cobblers and apparently they are not meaningless and infact provide a good service to people with shoe problems.


Ps Tillietrotter appears to be narcoleptic, tell her not to fall asleep near the Rosendale or her trotters could end up on the menu.


I promise to work on my chips though

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1634-the-rosendale/#findComment-45157
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looks like they do recognise a trades union USDAW - Sainsbury’s and Usdaw sign a new national agreement to improve trade union organising and representation within the business
    • Trees are great - I plant and raise my own and petition the council to look at damaged specimens and plant more - but they need to be tended to when they’re in non-woodland spaces. I encourage all those who have a strong liking for trees to plant them, grow from seed etc. - much better for all than tapping on keypads. 
    • Would they keep until Christmas?
    • As a customer of DKH I have sympathy with the staff but this a matter for their trade union to address. The law states that temperatures in the workplace must be “reasonable”, and adds guidance that a reasonable minimum temperature is 16C for sitting down jobs like checkouts or 13C for physical work like packing and stacking.  The law also states that there must be easily readable thermometers installed in the workplace so that staff can check the temperature. When I still worked, these would be mercury thermometers red-lined at 16C, so staff knew when it was permissible to stop work if they were uncomfortable. However, I always worked in trade union represented jobs. I suspect (but certainly don’t know) that a lot of Sainsbury’s staff these days don’t bother to join the union, so are not protected (please put me right if you know otherwise).  In any workplace, you either take collective action to improve things or just accept the conditions imposed on you. If staff are in a union, they need to take a hand in making sure the union and its reps do their job in representing them.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...